FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  What the Bok Team should be.

What the Bok Team should be.

Started by Rugganut22 REPLIES348 VIEWS· 12 Jun 2014, 13:03
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
12 Jun 2014, 13:03
#1
12 Jun 2014, 13:03#1

There have been loads of posters here criticizing HM for what he has selected. Name your team and don't just hide and say he has selected a shit side. I think he is short on options (take into account injuries, walkouts, etc)  but my walk on side would be.


1. Beast

2. Bizzy

3. Coenie

4. Bakkkies

5. Potgieter

6. Flo

7. Brussou

8. Duane

9. Reinach

10. Boshoff

11. Brian

12. Sadie/ Hollenbach

13. Esterhuizen/ Hollenbach/ JP

14. Mvovo/ Willie

15. Willie/ Mvovo


The backline as a whole are defensively weak and the 12/13 combo would have to be worked out on who could gel. That chance should have been taken last weekend.


Now name your side and don't just bitch.

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
12 Jun 2014, 13:18
#2
12 Jun 2014, 13:18#2
 That's 20 in your walk-on side Tuggernut........even then you'd probably lose to the ABs!!
RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
12 Jun 2014, 13:23
#3
12 Jun 2014, 13:23#3
 'and the 12/13 combo would have to be worked out' 

14. Mvovo/ Willie

15. Willie/ Mvovo


Someone please teach this Kiwi to read and count.

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
12 Jun 2014, 13:54
#4
12 Jun 2014, 13:54#4
 
Ummm .. Brussow is an openside specialist ... apart from not having the necessary blindside skills he's just not big enough.

I like Hollenbach but he breaks down every second match so not an option.

Esterhuisen is better suited at 12 with Sadie going to 13. I in any case prefer Jordaan to Sadie.

I would rather have Bakkies shot at dawn. Will never make my squad. My locks would be Bekker at 5 with Etsebeth at 4 and PSDT on the bench.

If not them then the next best in my opinion would be Flippie at 5 with Willemse at 4.

Victor would join Bakkies on the dump behind the main office.

Potgieter?? I presume that's Jacques.

Definitely don't like Coenie at 3. Not a test tighthead. Would prefer Redelinhyse or Marcell at 3.

 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jun 2014, 13:55
#5
12 Jun 2014, 13:55#5
 Rugga
Funny enough I agree with a lot of your selections, but would rather have Serfontein at 12 and Jordaan at 13.  The latter is the best defender in Super 15 and speedier than any of our present centers.  Problem is that he played outside of Fransie in Super 15 and barely ever saw a ball passed to him.  
I would rather have De Jager at lock instead of Bakkies - Bakkies last 15 minutes in any game - De Jager is good for the 80 minutes.
I would switch Louw and Brussow around - Louw at 7 and Brussow at 6.
Unfortunately Boshoff has an injury problem.   
I think that Meyer should have gone completely a different route last week and tried the players you mentioned in the main.  The older players was the problem - especially in the scrum and in the backline.  The latter really came alive only when Goosen came on at flyhalf.    
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
12 Jun 2014, 13:59
#6
12 Jun 2014, 13:59#6
 
This weekend we're up against a team that has something to gain. They will play with a different attitude and unlike the World XV they'll keep going till the final whistle.

I will also not accept any excuses from our fool coach. I can see him blaming the loss on injuries.






CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
12 Jun 2014, 14:03
#7
12 Jun 2014, 14:03#7
 
Mike ... Goosen is faaaaaaaar more fragile than Boshoff will ever be so I'm not sure what your on about there.


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jun 2014, 14:08
#8
12 Jun 2014, 14:08#8
Potgieter at lock...........geez Rugtwat, you are thick  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 Jun 2014, 14:13
#9
12 Jun 2014, 14:13#9
 Saffex
Jacques Potgieter did very well for the Waratahs at lock - I think that is what Rugga is on about here.   The other Jacques (Du Plessis) could also have been tried out here or even Lewies or Rh odes.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
12 Jun 2014, 14:49
#10
12 Jun 2014, 14:49#10
Potgieter is not a locks backside...............Lood, Willemse, Jacques du Plessis and Lewies are our options at lock with Etzebeth and PSDT out injured.  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jun 2014, 15:37
#11
12 Jun 2014, 15:37#11

Hahahaha....case closed. The bald car salesman really thinks Jordaan is the answer and Esterhuizen who has played no super rugby is vaulted into the tests.  Then he wants to bring back Bekker who is 30 years old, breaking his own age prohibition,  and who was never a test success....and some no name props.

 

How incredibly stupid can you be....Genecut stupid I guess, the outer limits of dumb.

AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
12 Jun 2014, 17:42
#12
12 Jun 2014, 17:42#12
 I would pick:

1. Oosthuizen   2. Bizzy    3. M. van der Merve

4. de Jager   5. Matfield  (once Etzebeth fit, Victor to the bench)

6. Brussow   7. Coetzee   8. Vermeulen

9. Reinach    10. Goosen

12. Sadie    13. Jordaan  (de Villiers and deAllende when fit)

11. Habana   14. JP Petersen   15. le Roux


16. Fourie (Strauss when cleared)  17. Mtwarira  18. Malherbe 

19.v der Merve 20. Burger  21. de Klerk  22. Potgeiter (Lambie when fit) 

23. JJ. Engelbrecht (he's a wing  and covers centre)


Brussow is IMO the best openside flanker in SA and one of the few real openside (with Fourie when he plays in that position). Louw is a good player but he's blindside.

The issue with Meyer's selection is that is very far from the best possible in SA. Jannie and Steenkamp as starting props? really? almost any combination btwin the props that usually start for their franchises in Super Rugby would be better.
Botha-Matfield? I really doubt that they reach the WC as the lock pair and there are some very promising youngs to test.
du Preez-M. Steyn in the halves? the same said for the props can be said here
Louw and JP Petersen are out of position. There are many blindside flankers to choose before Alberts: Coetzee, Burger, du Plessis, Potgeiter,...  and I doubt Hendriks is a test player
RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
13 Jun 2014, 04:54
#13
13 Jun 2014, 04:54#13
Thanks for the input. 
Clean: I have no news on Bekker so don't know. PSDT and Eben are injured. I said available players. 

Mike: My mistake and noted on Boschoff. Indeed Jacques Potgieter from the Waratahs.( His ball carries have been sublime this season and with Bakkies there could anchor the scrum. Quite handy in the lineout too)
Moz: Noted on Esterhuizen. We are just so thin on the ground at center and generally it is where our defensive weaknesses lie. JJ will never be in my consideration and Serfontein offers nothing in attack. JP playing out of position is not a Test option.
Basque: Agree on the flankers. 
Saffex: Name a side instead of just bitching and calling people names or go for counselling (which should have happened long ago)
So on this note the team should look like this:
1. Beast2. Bizzy3. Coenie (i hear you but still think it is best)4. Bakkies5. Potgieter6. Brussouw7. Flo8. Duane9. Reinach10. Goosen11. Brian12. Sadie13. Hollenbach14. Willie15. Mvovo
This would mean that HM got 50% right, in my book, which is not good enough.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 10:43
#14
13 Jun 2014, 10:43#14

AB fan I liked your side until I saw Matfield at 5 and that centre combo.

 

Matfield is a passenger, Sadie is a nice solid player who just does not have that something special to make him a test player and Jordaan in not physical enough for test rugby - not even close  

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 10:44
#15
13 Jun 2014, 10:44#15
Rugtwat.......that is a first, me being accused of not posting my sides......man you are thick  
RU
RugganutClub Pro183 posts
13 Jun 2014, 11:29
#16
13 Jun 2014, 11:29#16
Go to counselling ! and as soon as.  
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Jun 2014, 11:40
#17
13 Jun 2014, 11:40#17
 "Mike: My mistake and noted on Boschoff. Indeed Jacques Potgieter from the Waratahs.( His ball carries have been sublime this season and with Bakkies there could anchor the scrum. Quite handy in the lineout too)"
Jacques Potgieter at tight head?
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:22
#18
13 Jun 2014, 12:22#18
 
Agree ... a much better option than Jannie!!
AB
ABasquefanPro2,549 posts
13 Jun 2014, 12:37
#19
13 Jun 2014, 12:37#19
 @saffex,
I included Matfield in the starting XV just because injuries. At this moment there are a bunch of youngs in SA rugby who I would put before him in my picking order: Etzebeth, de Jager, PSdT,... but I would keep Matfield as a kind of advisor given his experience and leadership capabilities. I think it would be positive for the team to keep him in the bench.

Sadie, as his team-mate le Roux, is one of the few current SA player that can create and distribute the game. As you said he possibly lacks a bit of X-factor (though he has some) but compensate it with the variety of his game. The rest of the centers are very foreseeable and with de Villiers injured there are no many options. He's been the most inform 12 this season and IMO he deserves a chance to see if he can be de Villiers back-up and later his successor.

Jordan is a real outside center (unlike JP Petersen), with a decent speed and a good defense. This saturday this last qality is gonna be needed against the welsh combo Jamie Roberts-Jonathan Davies. R emember last EOYT how Davies broke the defense before getting injured?

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
13 Jun 2014, 14:47
#20
13 Jun 2014, 14:47#20

No AB, Matfield should not be anywhere near the match 23 other than possibly a forwards coach.

 

If Sadie does not have the X factor, which he does not, then he should not be playing test rugby. More to the point, you want him at 12, when he is a 13. Discarding Jan Serfontein at 12 for Sadie or Jordaan would be a laugh.

 

Jordaan is a nice little player, but at test level you need to be able to impose yourself physically both on attack and in defence.......defences are tight and well structured, much of centre play takes place in heavy traffic......its not the place for little guys like Jordaan and de Jongh. Robbie Fruaen exposed Jordaan last year when he ran straight over him.

 

JJ is by far our best 13, but Meyer seems to have lost faith with all our youngsters as he is an ignorant twat. JJ's display with ball in hand at 13 in the last test against the AB's was the best I have seen from a Bok 13 in the last 10 years. His defence this year in the S15 is the best of all S15 centres.......what more do we need in a test 13?

 

But that question cannot be directed at Meyer as he is too stupid to answer

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
16 Jun 2014, 12:46
#21
16 Jun 2014, 12:46#21


CleanCut

Status: Bok regular
Posts: 1580 RE: What the Bok Team should be.
June 12, 2014, 11:59:00  
This weekend we're up against a team that has something to gain. They will play with a different attitude and unlike the World XV they'll keep going till the final whistle.

I will also not accept any excuses from our fool coach. I can see him blaming the loss on injuries.



CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Jun 2014, 00:56
#22
17 Jun 2014, 00:56#22
I wonder WTF happened to ou CC?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Jun 2014, 06:25
#23
17 Jun 2014, 06:25#23
 The best option at 13 remains De Allende - I think Pietersen was just about adequate at 13 - so we need to move on - play him on the wing where he belongs.   Engelbrecht was poor in defense last year - improved on that - but he is also a recycled wing - harmless in attack at center.   Fourie is way past it and way too slow for the modern game - adequate in defense and a zero in attack.
I would go for a center pairing of De Villiers and De Allende - with Serfontein as back up.        
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news