Not that there will be any surprises.......Morne at 10.....bwhaahaaaaa
Captain30,741 posts
02 Sept 2014, 15:48
#1
02 Sept 2014, 15:48#1
When is clueless Meyer naming his average Bok side
Started by Saffolk 52 REPLIES410 VIEWS· 02 Sept 2014, 15:48
Captain49,914 posts
02 Sept 2014, 17:15
#2
02 Sept 2014, 17:15#2
Well it would be a surprise if Lomp starts.
Pro9,374 posts
02 Sept 2014, 17:17
#3
02 Sept 2014, 17:17#3
Loodvoet de Jager.
Captain49,914 posts
02 Sept 2014, 17:38
#4
02 Sept 2014, 17:38#4
Yep when the ever naive Rugby365 panel chose their TOW for the S15, they came up with Skelton and Lood. Sadly we are going to be spared the battle for top sloth.
Captain30,741 posts
02 Sept 2014, 17:42
#5
02 Sept 2014, 17:42#5
No Matfield will start instead and the Boks are going to get thumped........Matfield, Pienaar and Morne will ensure of that
Coach57,555 posts
02 Sept 2014, 17:46
#6
02 Sept 2014, 17:46#6
Mozart
De Jager never fell over his own feet like Alberts did in that game at Ellis Park last year. If there is a LOMP player it is Alberts.
Dave
Accept the worst when the team is announced tomorrow. Meyer will perhaps spare us the embarrassment of naming Steenkamp - but the rest of the geraitrics will be there - and they will hugger up the game against the Aussies - that is for sure.
De Jager never fell over his own feet like Alberts did in that game at Ellis Park last year. If there is a LOMP player it is Alberts.
Dave
Accept the worst when the team is announced tomorrow. Meyer will perhaps spare us the embarrassment of naming Steenkamp - but the rest of the geraitrics will be there - and they will hugger up the game against the Aussies - that is for sure.
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 00:48
#7
03 Sept 2014, 00:48#7
Lood is twice the player old man matfield is th ese days - he is a bloody joke. Oz and NZ are going to expose the old man for the physical liability he is these days
Pro9,374 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:13
#8
03 Sept 2014, 01:13#8
The Wikipedia face of rugby:
Rugby union South African Victor Matfield takes a line-out against New Zealand in 2006. Highest governing body International Rugby Board Nicknames Rugby, Rugger, Football, Union,[1] First played 1845, England (first written laws) Registered players 2,360,000[2][nb 1] Clubs 18,630 Characteristics Contact Full contact Team members 15 Mixed gender Separate competitions Type Team sport, Outdoor Equipment Rugby ball Presence Olympic Part of the Summer Olympic programme in 1900, 1908, 1920 and 1924
Rugby sevens reinstated 2016
Rugby union South African Victor Matfield takes a line-out against New Zealand in 2006. Highest governing body International Rugby Board Nicknames Rugby, Rugger, Football, Union,[1] First played 1845, England (first written laws) Registered players 2,360,000[2][nb 1] Clubs 18,630 Characteristics Contact Full contact Team members 15 Mixed gender Separate competitions Type Team sport, Outdoor Equipment Rugby ball Presence Olympic Part of the Summer Olympic programme in 1900, 1908, 1920 and 1924
Rugby sevens reinstated 2016
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:15
#9
03 Sept 2014, 01:15#9
Huh
Captain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:21
#10
03 Sept 2014, 01:21#10
Yep let's not have any more of these moments
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:24
#11
03 Sept 2014, 01:24#11
Nope instead we will have an old light weight who is going to get dominated physically.
Captain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:24
#12
03 Sept 2014, 01:24#12
Maybe this is where it all went wrong:
Captain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:26
#13
03 Sept 2014, 01:26#13
An old lightweight...who has always been a lightweight and the greatest lock in our history. A lock that doesn't miss simple tackles for tries ...as we see tragically a few posts above.
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:27
#14
03 Sept 2014, 01:27#14
Lood was probably the best lock in the whole of the s15 this year - the lad is pure class, the future unlike some of our sad excuses being currently selected
Captain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:29
#15
03 Sept 2014, 01:29#15
Yes unfortunately nobody told the Bargies who owned him.
Pro9,374 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:46
#16
03 Sept 2014, 01:46#16
mozart
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8420 RE: When is clueless Meyer naming his average Bok side
September 02, 2014, 23:21:34
Yep. "Pure Loodvoet" . He does not look interested in chasing at all. Not in the least. Just going through the motions. Nothing more.
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8420 RE: When is clueless Meyer naming his average Bok side
September 02, 2014, 23:21:34
Yep let's not have any more of these moments
Yep. "Pure Loodvoet" . He does not look interested in chasing at all. Not in the least. Just going through the motions. Nothing more.
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:49
#17
03 Sept 2014, 01:49#17
Crap no a rgie lock owned lood at all
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:50
#18
03 Sept 2014, 01:50#18
Geez vlagshit you are thick. What chance would a massive lock have of catching a 9 you ignorant prick
Captain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 01:54
#19
03 Sept 2014, 01:54#19
H e didn't have to catch the nine you bloody fool, the nine ran straight through his tackle and then he didn't even have the guts to put in a decent chase.
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:04
#20
03 Sept 2014, 02:04#20
Crap he ran under bismark and loods clutches and to think a lock or hooked had any hope of putting up a chase is stupidity of the highest order
Captain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:16
#21
03 Sept 2014, 02:16#21
Oh sure, he suddenly became two feet high.
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:19
#22
03 Sept 2014, 02:19#22
Huh?
Pro9,374 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:23
#23
03 Sept 2014, 02:23#23
A discription of how the Pumas' Cubelli scored their second try.
After sucking the opposition narrow – there are at least six would-be tacklers within 10 metres of the ruck – Landajo now heads wider, bypassing Pablo Matera in the primary wave and hitting his fly-half Nicolas Sanchez instead. The pass is not quite firm enough, and the resultant grubber comes to nothing, but South Africa have still been stretched by the scrum-half’s varied attacking approach.
That trend continued until Landajo left the fray at end of the first period. And Cubelli ensured there was no let up. In fact, the replacement’s try six minutes into the second half was a continuation of his teammate’s work.
Rather than quietly acclimatise to the pace of the encounter, Cubelli added verve to the Argentina effort. Here, six phases into an abrasive movement, he manoeuvres his pack as Landajo did and sends a long pass into midfield from the left-hand touchline. Suddenly, the Pumas have a 15-metre blind-side and can attack on two fronts.
Perhaps fatigued, perhaps betraying inexperience in just his fourth Test, de Jager (dark green circle) expects the Pumas to come around the corner and over-chases towards the open-side of the ruck. For less than a second, South Africa do not have a guard in place on the blind-si de.
As you can see from the screenshot, his shoulders are pointing in precisely the opposite direction to Cubelli’s opportunistic gaze – a stark contrast to the coiled body position at the ruck in the first three minutes when Landajo was on. Unfortunately, an exceptionally aware scrum-half punishes the concentration lapse.
Clearly, du Plessis has called de Jager across but must turn his hips in as Cubelli embarks on his rapid outside arc. Paused here, we see how dangerous the situation has become. de Jager is struggling to recover, du Plessis’s weight is on his heels and Cubelli has a decent-sized gap to aim for.
Both Springboks do manage to scramble back. Even so, they can only meet Cubelli with relatively weak arms rather than planting their feet and dropping a shoulder. Cubelli does show impressive strength to get through and stay upright (past Willie Le Roux), but the chance is created primarily by speed of thought – and South Africa’s consequent indecision.
http://www.rugbyworld.com/news/blogs/play-like-pichot-argentinas-scrum-halves-analysed/
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:29
#24
03 Sept 2014, 02:29#24
Just as I said under their grasp.
Well done vlagshit that's your best contribution to d ate
Well done vlagshit that's your best contribution to d ate
Pro9,374 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:29
#25
03 Sept 2014, 02:29#25
Saffex
Status: Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8999 RE: When is clueless Meyer naming his average Bok side
September 02, 2014, 23:50:41 Geez vlag[removed] you are thick. What chance would a massive lock have of catching a 9 you ignorant [removed]
Now check the post above and you will see that Loodvoet didn't really chase him. He was breaking away after he went straight through Loodvoet and Bismarck without them even being able to stop him because of either Loodvoet's fatigue or his inexperience.
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:37
#27
03 Sept 2014, 02:37#27
Wrong there is nothing lazy about lood he is one of the most active locks you will ever see and your post clearly shows the tiny 9 slipping under lood AND bismarks grasp.
But just for interest sake how the f do you apportion blame on lood alone and not bismark you fucking useless prejudicial pri.. .......ck
But just for interest sake how the f do you apportion blame on lood alone and not bismark you fucking useless prejudicial pri.. .......ck
Pro9,374 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:42
#28
03 Sept 2014, 02:42#28
Loodvoet was the one wondering around and not paying attention on what was going on. He was the one who missed the move that was coming. He was not facing the threat and he was not watching what was going on. Bismarck had to call him over to help cover. Loodvoet's lapse in concentration was the reason why the gap opened up. Bismarck tried to rectify his balls-up.
Gaan slaap nou. Jy is moeg Vaalseun.
Gaan slaap nou. Jy is moeg Vaalseun.
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:48
#29
03 Sept 2014, 02:48#29
Stop clutching at straws Dom doos......but thanks for the photo confirmation - good work magpie
Bwhaaahaaa aa. ......love it
Bwhaaahaaa aa. ......love it
Captain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 05:17
#30
03 Sept 2014, 05:17#30
Captain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 05:23
#31
03 Sept 2014, 05:23#31
As you can see from the picture the scrummie moved inside away from Bismarck, who was not positioned to make anything but an arm tackle. Lomp is the man that interests him, check where he is looking. Lomp is trotting across. But then goes so high, Cubelli simply slips under his tackle. Culpability 80 per cent Lomp.
Coach57,555 posts
03 Sept 2014, 07:42
#32
03 Sept 2014, 07:42#32
Mozart
At least De Jager went too high - he is not pushed out of the way like Grrom did in a recnet game with the useless Matfield.
At least De Jager went too high - he is not pushed out of the way like Grrom did in a recnet game with the useless Matfield.
Pro9,374 posts
03 Sept 2014, 13:25
#33
03 Sept 2014, 13:25#33
Loodvoet was the reason why Arg scored that try, ou Maaikie. Lazy bugger. He poured every inch of his so-called brilliance into that first 40 minutes of his international career and has nothing left after that. Forty minutes of great play and fokol thereafter. He everybody fooled with his début game.
Pro1,978 posts
03 Sept 2014, 13:36
#34
03 Sept 2014, 13:36#34
Dave always predicts the Boks to get thumped but he always eats his words..Every time yet he still does it!!
That side named misses the big man..Willem Alberts would have been huge in this game..Marcell is in red hot form though but he just aint the imposing force of Willem..Jan at 13 to keep Kuridrani in check will be interesting..I might have stayed with De Allende...We are missing a 13 big time. Doesnt help when the best 13 in SA currently is playing for his union in the Currie Cup..Juan De Jongh!!
That side named misses the big man..Willem Alberts would have been huge in this game..Marcell is in red hot form though but he just aint the imposing force of Willem..Jan at 13 to keep Kuridrani in check will be interesting..I might have stayed with De Allende...We are missing a 13 big time. Doesnt help when the best 13 in SA currently is playing for his union in the Currie Cup..Juan De Jongh!!
Captain40,032 posts
03 Sept 2014, 13:58
#35
03 Sept 2014, 13:58#35
"An old lightweight...who has always been a lightweight and the greatest lock in our history" say Dr Moz!!!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA. What a monumental INSULT to Bok locks. MATFILED IN NOT VODACOM STANDARD. A ONE DIMENSIONAL PLAYER ETC
Lood has had a great Super 15 season showing what a great athlete he is. 125 kg of power and mobility. Hard working - Does the hard stuff a lock should do. Stupid to drop him. I see ou cerudunce windpomp is echoing Moz once more. Listen windpomp, Lood dominated in the Super 15 again test locks. Dont add your nonsense to this issie please oak!Thankfully that serial loafer Alberts is not in the side. Coetze will at least battle for 80 minutes and do at least 8 times the work Alberts achieves.Allende covers center and wing. Mvovo is a wing but Lambie covers fullback. Why is Mvovo in the team?
Lood has had a great Super 15 season showing what a great athlete he is. 125 kg of power and mobility. Hard working - Does the hard stuff a lock should do. Stupid to drop him. I see ou cerudunce windpomp is echoing Moz once more. Listen windpomp, Lood dominated in the Super 15 again test locks. Dont add your nonsense to this issie please oak!Thankfully that serial loafer Alberts is not in the side. Coetze will at least battle for 80 minutes and do at least 8 times the work Alberts achieves.Allende covers center and wing. Mvovo is a wing but Lambie covers fullback. Why is Mvovo in the team?
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 14:03
#36
03 Sept 2014, 14:03#36
Chicken......kindly point out where I have said the Boks WOULD lose previously you liar
Pro1,978 posts
03 Sept 2014, 14:20
#37
03 Sept 2014, 14:20#37
Every game u go on about how poor the selections are and this team will get thumped.I dont know how to pull up old posts...If someone else does, they will expose u!!
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 14:25
#38
03 Sept 2014, 14:25#38
Chicken shit you are a fucking liar.......but why not man up and provide the evidence of me saying that the Boks would get thumped other than against Oz and NZ you fucking low life
Pro1,978 posts
03 Sept 2014, 14:31
#39
03 Sept 2014, 14:31#39
Did Aus thump us last year Saffex u piece of sh!t? Sure u said it about Wales this year too..I dont know how to pull old posts back..Can u not read low life!
Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 14:33
#40
03 Sept 2014, 14:33#40
I'm not talking last year you complete fucking idiot - wake the fuck up.
Geez you are toooooo f stupid to get the basics right.....but why not just man up and provide the evidence low life lying scum
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)
