FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Where's the.....

Where's the.....

Started by Denny6 REPLIES196 VIEWS· 21 Feb 2012, 02:00
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
21 Feb 2012, 15:25
#1
21 Feb 2012, 15:25#1

Commonsense in sending Levi home after 20/20 finishes and not keeping him for the ODI series? Surely he justified a change of plan, all it needed was for CSA to show a little bit of flexibility.

CH
ChippoPro3,372 posts
21 Feb 2012, 17:24
#2
21 Feb 2012, 17:24#2

Bloody quota system

I hate it.

Just because he has pink skin and blonde hair and eats too much biltong.

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
22 Feb 2012, 05:00
#3
22 Feb 2012, 05:00#3

Forgot about that one......

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
22 Feb 2012, 12:36
#4
22 Feb 2012, 12:36#4

Surely he could simply have been added to the existing squad?

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
22 Feb 2012, 13:47
#5
22 Feb 2012, 13:47#5

That's exactly what I'm saying.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
22 Feb 2012, 23:52
#6
22 Feb 2012, 23:52#6

There are rules. Someone else would then have been sent home. Who?

He should have been there from the start.

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
23 Feb 2012, 05:43
#7
23 Feb 2012, 05:43#7

There's sufficient justification to bend the rules in Levi's case....moreso than the justification of the useless Ontong or the average and ageing Robin Pieterson. Speaking of the squad, what sense is there in having two full time spinners in Botha and Pieterson and a part spinner in Duminy? It  seems like an overkill in having too many spinners.

I reckon allowing Levi to stay on and play in the ODI's would have given him a ton of confidence especially being on foreign soil. Pretty damn sad to see an opportunity gone begging.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news