FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Where to now for Jake?

Where to now for Jake?

Started by hakwa14 REPLIES185 VIEWS· 26 Jul 2014, 14:45
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
26 Jul 2014, 14:45
#1
26 Jul 2014, 14:45#1

Possible answers

1. Leave the Sharks

2. Take over from Meyers

3. Have another shot with the Sharks for a S15 Title

4. Go back to the Brumbies.

5. Go to the Queenslands reds


What do you say

GT
Gonzo the GreatClub Pro560 posts
26 Jul 2014, 14:48
#2
26 Jul 2014, 14:48#2
 Obviously hes staying with the Sharks. i dont get what you mean "where to now", he just gave the Sharks their best season since 2007. they've been in limbo for six years, so hes done a great job and will carry on.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,294 posts
26 Jul 2014, 14:56
#3
26 Jul 2014, 14:56#3
 The Sharks were in the final in 2012, but this season was probably better until the end of the season when the form dipped allot. 
GT
Gonzo the GreatClub Pro560 posts
26 Jul 2014, 15:08
#4
26 Jul 2014, 15:08#4
 Sharkbok, they scrapped 6th place in 2012 and they played their hardest playoff game before the final in South Africa. they were worse than 2014 by a long way and were absolutely hammered in the final.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
26 Jul 2014, 16:31
#5
26 Jul 2014, 16:31#5
 Ou hacked waaugh wants to write off a coach because he doesnt win Super comp in first year? What a hatter!
Who are the Sharks loosing to overseas. Daniel and Deysel. who else.
Jake will build the Sharks squad and with the Stormers and Bulle on the rise we should have again 3 of the top six and could then win it. 
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
26 Jul 2014, 16:36
#6
26 Jul 2014, 16:36#6
...When you look at the Jake and the Sharks, there was a lot of smoke and mirrors... their first game preceded those of NZ and Oz by a round so that automatically artificially inflated their standing on the table to begin with...deceiving also when they then went on to play a succession of home games in the weakest and easiest of conferences bolstered by their home ground advantage - further artificially inflating their standing on the table.......in the end Jake could see his season was a sham,  the game was up and the chickens were finally coming home to roost so he started to whinge and complain about the unfairness of the competition....despite not having to play the Force or the Chiefs - too funny... when in fact his team had the easiest run out of all the teams... still a good team with a lot of Springboks in the side but not sure whether Jake the flake has contributed to anything they've achieved...
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
26 Jul 2014, 17:43
#7
26 Jul 2014, 17:43#7
 Where will Jake go next? Probably Japan, he doesn't like s15 
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
26 Jul 2014, 21:08
#8
26 Jul 2014, 21:08#8
 I see the kbbs brains aredesparately trying to cause an anti Jake uproar. We all knoiw why. Bwahhahahahahaha 
Beeno reading these kbbs like an open Book.
Always remeber kbs how master jake schooled sirs John and Graham.
What beat the Sharks was above everything the 12,000 km trip to play the game.
Jake did not make the numerous unforced mistakes his palyers made.
Beeno guiding the kbbs into the light AND unmasking their amateurish attempts to get rid of Ma ster Jake.
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
26 Jul 2014, 21:13
#9
26 Jul 2014, 21:13#9
 Beeno: we want Jake to stay, please keep him in SA. He is the only coach that can get an SA team into the finals.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
26 Jul 2014, 21:46
#10
26 Jul 2014, 21:46#10
I don't really care where Joke White goes as long as it's far away from the Sharks!
It's not just that Joke failed miserably with the potentially great team that John Plumtree built, he also took away their soul and their ball-retention roots and forced them play an ugly, sterile kicking game. 
In John Plumtree, the Sharks had finally found a coach who gave us back the spirit of Ian McIntosh and Izak van Heerden . . . but instead of dominating Southern Hemisphere rugby for a decade under Plumtree, they fired him and appointed a complete and utter twat with the personality of Moffie and the rugby nous of Baboon-ou! 
There's no forgiving or excusing this pompous, overrated and incompetent loser , just take him far away from the Sharks, please! I mean really, listen to him whining like a pathetic little bitch because the Crusaders didn't have to play the Waratahs! We don't need this embarrassing crybaby, let him go coach the Hapless Stompies . . . Joke will fit right in! Seriously!
John Smit has been an absolute disaster as a CEO and as much as I admired him as a player, he can join Joke and piss off. I've said it before, I'd rather lose games playing good old fashioned Sharks rugby than win games playing this conservative territorial crap. 
Fire Joke and Smit and let's get back to playing traditional Natal rugby! I'll take Brad McLeod-Henderson in a heartbeat . . . heck, I reckon I'd take Twakkie as coach before Joke White!

Well done to the Crusaders for exposing the Sharks naive game-plan, their lack of professionalism and their absolutely pathetic coach!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
26 Jul 2014, 22:04
#11
26 Jul 2014, 22:04#11
 HAHAHAHAHAHAou rooitwit has turned up at last and is as predictable as could be and getting it inevitably it wrong as always.Side splitting stuff for ou rootwit. what happened when the crusties lost to 13 shark s with no jetlag. Explain that ya micro wit.
BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
26 Jul 2014, 23:28
#12
26 Jul 2014, 23:28#12

...Bean Brain too easy mate , it was obvious the previous game was nothing more than an anomaly....the Crusties didn't have International Player of the Year Kieren Reid playing....or for that matter the world's best fullback in Israel Dagg.... or Dan Carter, arguably the Worlds best flyhalf,...not to mention Richie McCaw was probably playing with a broken rib -  the legend...each of those players are worth about five of yours mate...

On top of that try scoring machine Nadolo wasn't playing either.... Kapeesh ?


...Rooinek is correct. Jake the flake is an embarrassment to SA whining like a 'pathetic little bitch because the Crusaders didn't have to play the Waratahs'....he's a ' pompous, overrated and incompetent loser and the Sharkies will do better without the twit....

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
27 Jul 2014, 00:09
#13
27 Jul 2014, 00:09#13
" ...Rooinek is correct. Jake the flake is an embarrassment to SA whining like a 'pathetic little bitch because the Crusaders didn't have to play the Waratahs'....he's a ' pompous, overrated and incompetent loser and the Sharkies will do better without the twit...."

Now where did I here a similar "Yeah but you didn't have to play this, that and the other...." type of remark before?
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 Jul 2014, 00:35
#14
27 Jul 2014, 00:35#14
The Sharks were missing three of their first team tight five. They had to travel 12,000 km. When they played the crusties the first time they were over jetlag. Palying almost an entire match with 14 men and 10 minutes with 13 men shows these Sharks are better than the crusties if the playing fields were level.End of story

Brycy believe me the Sharks will not be getting rid of Jake because halfwits like you and ou rooitwit are babling away so pathetically.
Well done to Jake for getting the sharks going again after the floundering of Plumtree.
Excellent start Jake keep going.  
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
27 Jul 2014, 01:47
#15
27 Jul 2014, 01:47#15
 Sharks beat the saders  in the first game, sader beat the sharks in the second game. I leave to you to figure out which was more important. Reasons/excuses don't matter.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news