FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  whistle blowers need to front up; by Richard Lowe

whistle blowers need to front up; by Richard Lowe

Started by Just_win1 REPLIES93 VIEWS· 13 Apr 2014, 14:39
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
13 Apr 2014, 14:39
#1
13 Apr 2014, 14:39#1

It has become a constant theme that a lot of refereeing decisions being made in Super Rugby are fairly average.


The Highlanders game against the Bulls was another example of that. I thought Rohan Hoffman was pretty bloody awful again. He had the Blues the previous week in Canberra where he struggled. It was the same again in Dunedin.

It's not that he favoured one team over the other, it's just he was inconsistent and hard to follow. Players really hate inconsistency. It makes the game hard for them to play and enjoy when the rulings don't make sense or change from one instance to the next.

That's two weeks in a row Mr Hoffman hasn't been particularly good and I wonder if the time has come to make him accountable.

I'm not sure what referees get paid but I would imagine they are on a fairly good wicket and they have to take responsibility for their performances and be accountable.

In that regard, I would like to see them be more assertive.

Too many are referring decisions to the TMO when I think they could make them themselves in conjunction with their touch judges.

The one thing that is really starting to annoy me is this whole business of when a forward pass is forward or a dropped ball a knock-on.

I hear people now - and the South Africans are the worst at this - saying the ball came out of the back of the hand, or that the hands were pointing backwards when the ball was passed.

Excuse me, but that's just nonsense. A forward pass is a forward pass. The ball comes out of the hands and goes forward. Simple.

It's the same with a knock-on. I saw Hoffman rule a few times when Bulls players dropped the ball, that it had gone backwards and to play on. Really? A dropped ball is a knock-on. Simple.

Something clearly needs to be done to speed the game up around scrums and lineouts. I would say a time limit should be in place for teams to set the scrum.

If they are mucking about and take too long ... free kick. Same with the lineouts. The hooker shouldn't be standing with the ball in his hand pretending he can't hear the call all just to milk some extra time.

It's not about finding ways to penalise teams and creating more opportunity for stoppages. It's about having deterrents in place to encourage a speedier game.

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
13 Apr 2014, 14:47
#2
13 Apr 2014, 14:47#2
 IMO he is right in that refs need to be consistent and the game needs to be faster. 
On referring to the TMO, I am fine with that as long as it is not excessive. The ref has to do everything he can to get the right call. 
On the forward pass, I think he is wrong on that, i.e a ball that is dropped is not always a forward pass. Maybe if the changed the rule to  make this the case it would be clearer for everyone.
On the scrums they still don't have it right but it least it is more competitive. Problem is when the scrum  goes down I am not sure they can tell whose fault it is and it is a bit like Russian roulette on who gets penalized. Refs are also inconsistent on ruling if the feed is straight or not. They are still tinkering with the rules for the scrum & it is still not fixed. I like to see the scrum in action so I hope they can get some rules in place that keep it, ensure it is competitive & reduce the re-sets.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news