FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Whitely replaces Alberts

Whitely replaces Alberts

Started by Gonzo the Great11 REPLIES347 VIEWS· 29 Aug 2014, 14:40
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
GT
Gonzo the GreatClub Pro560 posts
29 Aug 2014, 14:40
#1
29 Aug 2014, 14:40#1

JOHANNESBURG: Warren Whiteley has replaced fellow back-rower Willem Alberts in the South Africa squad for Rugby Championship Tests in Australia and New Zealand next month.


Alberts, who missed narrow home and away wins over Argentina this month in the southern hemisphere competition through injury, was included in a 30-man squad named three days ago.


However, his inclusion was conditional on passing a fitness test in Johannesburg and the Springboks medical staff believe Alberts has not fully recovered from a hamstring injury.


"Willem requires further investigation of the symptoms and will see specialists to determine the optimal management plan to get him back on the field," said team doctor Craig Roberts on Thursday.


Whiteley skippered the Lions this season to their best Super Rugby showing and
travelled to Argentina last week, but did not play in the 33-31 Test win.


"Warren really impressed me last week - he has been playing very well and it made sense to get him back in," said South Africa coach Heyneke Meyer.


"Like Willem, he is very effective with ball in hand and also a great option at the back of the lineout.

"More importantly, Warren is a natural No.8, a position where we need cover, but he can play flank as well."

Toulon loose forward Juan Smith was originally on stand-by should Alberts not be able to travel, but pulled out, believing he needs to work on his match fitness.

"Juan has very high standards and was not happy with his performance in Salta," explained Meyer.

The Springboks play the Wallabies on September 6 in Perth and the All Blacks on September 13 in Wellington.

South Africa top the table after two rounds with eight points, title-holders New Zealand have seven, and Argentina and Australia two each.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/union-news/boks-replace-willem-alberts-ahead-of-wallabies-20140829-109to9.html#ixzz3BmCIOfV9


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Aug 2014, 15:32
#2
29 Aug 2014, 15:32#2
 Excellent news - but out of date,  There was already a thread on this one.  The fat and lazy bugger will niot be missed - we have far better flank forwards than this one.    With Coetzee starting at 7 we can at least match the Aussie loosies - with A lberts it would have been two  SA loosies playing against three  Aussie loosies.   
I hope that Whiteley gets a chance to play from the bench. 
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Aug 2014, 16:06
#3
29 Aug 2014, 16:06#3

Whitely is a good player but his selection makes no sense given the fact that Alberts is a bruiser and therefore it would have made far more sense to select the impressive Jacques du Plessis as Alberts replacement.

 

 

Another Meyer fuck up

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Aug 2014, 18:01
#4
29 Aug 2014, 18:01#4
The absence of Alberts and Flip Flop reduces the power of our pack in the mauls and scrums. We have other good players, but it was this concentrated power that made our YE tour so easy. Fools will completely miss this of course. We will struggle at the breakdown in oz without counter rucking power.  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
29 Aug 2014, 18:32
#5
29 Aug 2014, 18:32#5

Given Lood provides more clout than Flip and Alberts has been awol for some time now, neither are a loss at all.

 

What we will see with the introduction of Matfield, is our pack really getting its arse kicked  

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Aug 2014, 19:38
#6
29 Aug 2014, 19:38#6
Mozart
Given that Alberts stands around behind mauls and rarely enters same - how come Alberts will make any impact on mauls"   His contribution to scrums is bordering on the non-exustent as well.   Fools will completely miss his low wark rate and his tendency to miss crucial tackles - while not contributiing to ball pretection and ball recovery at all.   
The breakkdowns will be finished and the ball gone by the time Fatso arrives at the mauls and then he would stand around at the back and contribute zero to ball recovery.  If you have not seen that as yet - have a look next time around - you may yet wake up.   
GT
Gonzo the GreatClub Pro560 posts
29 Aug 2014, 20:34
#7
29 Aug 2014, 20:34#7
 mate your views are so extreme i end up defending plsyers im not even fond of! of course he adds alot to mauls his only issued are laziness and mobility. 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Aug 2014, 21:27
#8
29 Aug 2014, 21:27#8
Lood was tossed about like a toothpick by the Bargies. He needs a few more years, just like Steff who got  injured too much, because he was trying too hard against mature men. These 6 ft 8 inch boys are very vulnerable and falling like flies. The good thing about Lomp though, is he doesn't try too hard...he'll probably avoid the injury. Oh and while he is waiting for his body to mature, he should read some books on competiti veness and brush up on his tackling.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Aug 2014, 01:10
#9
30 Aug 2014, 01:10#9
 Mozart
I did not see anything of the tioss around BS you sprout now.   The only lock I have seen tossed around this year was Slapgat Matfield.  He was tossed out of the way by the WP scrummie and worse still he was tossed out of mauls by virtually every team - landing on the frass on the side of the maul.   
I slao want to see when DE Jager does not try to hard - the BS spouted by you is really amazing.   When De Jager tackle someboidy he foes back int he tackle and it takes 2 to 3 players to bring him down going forward.
The way you can come up with things that never happened really is amazing.   Have you ever poken the truth about players you do not like?  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Aug 2014, 02:28
#10
30 Aug 2014, 02:28#10
All I saw was a Lomp trotting about 10 metres behind play flapping his arms in a very er unusual way, missing tackles and getting knocked backwards. I warned you chaps....nowhere near RC ready. Give him two years and we'll know what we have, so far it isn't looking good.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
30 Aug 2014, 12:51
#11
30 Aug 2014, 12:51#11
 "his only issued are laziness and mobility". Opines ou gounzou. Hahahahahahaha so being lazy and lacking mobilty is not a problem. You want a guy who is lazy and lacks mobility playing against oz.You also want a 106 kg lock. Hilarious. Saw lood make a number of good tight forard moves. No problem with him.Give Lood the experience this RC and he will be ready for the RWC. Nice mobile 80 minute pla yer who has far far more clout than pap victor.

Note oaks that Juan Smith is working on his fitness. Shows playing in the NH comps does not ensure the right level of fitness. Good luck Juan.
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
30 Aug 2014, 12:54
#12
30 Aug 2014, 12:54#12
Hope he can speak die Taal .
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news