Who needs Rohan when we have Damian?

Not my words, Allister Coetzee's.

This oke is seriously delusional!

 Not his words either ....a serious distortion of what he said in content and tone.

 This man is delusional and it shows that HE and not any of the present players performances - such as Jantjies and De Allende - stem from his delusional game plan.   He still believes in Jake-balling and not rugby.   What makes the article more laughable is the fact that he used De Jongh with disastrous effect to start at 12 in his last two tests.    Can he ever be taken seriously?      

 Hahaha so here we have another opinion....the Allende flop is due to Coetzee. 

Oh do shut up you tiresome and pedantic old windbag.

"And if you consider what Rohan can do (breaking the gain-line), we have that in Damian at the moment,"

Close enough. Now go change your adult nappy for goodness sake!

 No it's not....your headline suggests Coetzee was dismissive of Rohan. He wasn't. He was doing what any sensible coach would do, support the players he selected before a big game. Your headline is totally consistent with the lies and distortions you have always pulled.

 Mozart - why the hell do you keep up writing sh!t on this site?   You are so rugby stupid in what you wrote that one really feel some pity for you as well.

Okay, so explain to me what stupid statement I made on this string prompted your last response. Go ahead....no ducking and diving. Justify yourself,

Ou Maaik, leave the pompous old tosser to stand there and stamp his foot. Goodness knows why the foppish and dim-witted old fart thinks everyone owes him an explanation or has to justify themselves to him. He clearly has delusions of adequacy.

Go ahead Tokkie.....what stupid statement. Back up your statement. Your hacking master has made a fool of himself, try to help.

 Mozart your going on about De Allende and your info was totally misplaced once more.   By the way Coetzee released De Allende this weekend for playing for WP.  So what he said was total delusion.   He apparently thinks De Jongh is an acceptable center - that says it all,  

 NWCO!

What a clown!

"And if you consider what Rohan can do (breaking the gain-line), we have that in Damian at the moment,"

And then he drops De Allende . . . so basically he hasn't got any plans to try and break the gain line.

I know it's a tough job and I know Coetzee is under political pressure that we're not aware of, but he really does deserve all the ridicule that comes his way. I think the moronic Pieter de Villiers was a more competent coach than Allister Coetzee and that says it all!

 Well there had to be a reason of some sort to explain why he's ignored Janse van Rensburg.  
Now we know. 
He's actually said two things of importance. Two things that help us see into his puny brain. It's scary.   

Firstly ... apparently Rohan isn't special at all and there's no future for him at test level. He's a crashballer like Damian ... apparently ... nothing more ... so there's no need to replace like with like. We already have that in Damian.
Secondly ... a powerful Nonu type at 12 isn't what he's looking for. It's not part of his "game plan" ... he sees a totally different function for our inside centre.  
Fcuk knows what it is.  
Stuns me that we have such a stupid man at the helm.
There really is no hope for us with him there.

 Where are all the guys who dumped on me when I told you all a year ago Damien is a liability. Now everybody thinks he's useless. But I'm puzzled by Coetzee's omission of Rohan though.....and of Marx. These are the two Lions players who have a real shot at being permanent players in their positions. Unlike Whiteley, Kriel, Mostert, Mapoe and Jantjies they aren't fighting physical negatives. 

 Yeah and with these weedy men we managed to contest the super rugby final.
How did we ever manage it?
Puzzling!!

 

You lost your voice blob?