He only won 63% of his games.
Captain49,914 posts
13 Nov 2013, 17:34
#1
13 Nov 2013, 17:34#1
Why Victor is no legend
Started by Mozart5 REPLIES189 VIEWS· 13 Nov 2013, 17:34
Club Pro471 posts
13 Nov 2013, 17:52
#2
13 Nov 2013, 17:52#2
Which is close to the average win ratio for South Africa throughout history (62%).
But that is what it's like when someone uses the worst argument in the history of mankind to try and slag off one player...
Eh, you can also add Butch James, a world cup winner at 54%
But that is what it's like when someone uses the worst argument in the history of mankind to try and slag off one player...
Eh, you can also add Butch James, a world cup winner at 54%
Coach57,555 posts
13 Nov 2013, 18:00
#3
13 Nov 2013, 18:00#3
Pro9,905 posts
13 Nov 2013, 18:17
#4
13 Nov 2013, 18:17#4
Haaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaaaa!!!
Too funny!!!!!!
Captain49,914 posts
13 Nov 2013, 19:10
#5
13 Nov 2013, 19:10#5
I think we can safely deep six that argument.
Club Pro713 posts
14 Nov 2013, 15:03
#6
14 Nov 2013, 15:03#6
Wait Mozart, there is yet more to learn... Wayne Julies has a 90% record! So he is better than every other Boks in Meyer's team! Even Basson, with 81%, makes Victor look rather ordinary.
— END OF THREAD —
