why indeed?
Why was Bismarck substituted on an attacking Bok scrum 5metres from the tryline when the Boks were leading
very frustrating
Awesome input there adder. Really insightful. Riveting stuff.
It was clearly a mistake. Maybe a lack of experience showing itself.
No matter ... reckon Meyer would have learnt from it. We as a whole learnt a lot from this loss.
We haven't hit our straps yet and already we're pushing the no 1 team in the world with our second rate play. There's a lot of promise and I'm excited for what lies ahead.
Bismark should be made our first choice hooker. Strauss is world class and we're fortunate to have him. He's not a Bismark though.
Hilarious stuff. One cheap shot on Carter and all the gullible and naive yarpies are worshipping De pussy like he's God.
Meyer the Springbok coach does'nt buy into all the hype though does he as he's not as neurotic and irrational as some of these Springbok fans.
Mccaw similarly targeted by Kolisi most recently attempting similar folk hero status.
King Richie is unflappable though and has learned to accept these cheap shots on him as his badge of honor.
Hmmmmmmmmm ... note to self ... black adder is a moron second only to Stoopid and a smidge above Wart.
Clearly inbreeding has once again shown itself here.
Well we both know why your here ... don't we??
Funny how there’s always one girl mixing with the boys.
A
cheerleader of sorts ... with pompoms and all … doing those extra high kicks … all in the
name of supporting the team.
Funny how when the boys get together years later they always
end up talking about “what’s her name again” and how much they enjoyed her “support”
…
Aaaaaaah yes … the good old times.
Still a mystery why Bismarck was substituted and the timing? Obviously he wasn't told at half time as it certainly surprised him
but i think meyers subbing of bizzy was just a huge mistake, 5 meter attacking scrum, they should of just left him on, i would have considered subbing him of on the 60th to 65th minute mark, but not as early as they did.
i wonder if hansens subbing of hore for cole at the beginning of the 2nd half, somehow played a mind game factor with meyer, cos cole was all over the place on the field when he came with his fresh hurricane legs.
im sure after meyer watches the replays, he will realise that it was a mistake to sub of bizzy at that time.
but i think meyers subbing of bizzy was just a huge mistake, 5 meter attacking scrum, they should of just left him on, i would have considered subbing him of on the 60th to 65th minute mark, but not as early as they did.
i wonder if hansens subbing of hore for cole at the beginning of the 2nd half, somehow played a mind game factor with meyer, cos cole was all over the place on the field when he came with his fresh hurricane legs.
im sure after meyer watches the replays, he will realise that it was a mistake to sub of bizzy at that time.
IMO he wasn't thinking about Bismarck at all as he was just another pawn. I think that Meyers thought fresh legs and strength from Coenie and Strauss could result in a push-over or penalty try for the Boks.
I think Meyer over estimated how good his bench was compared to AB's? Simple as that.


