FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Will Meyer continue his Springboks revolution on spring tour? By Harry Jones

Will Meyer continue his Springboks revolution on spring tour? By Harry Jones

Started by Just_win3 REPLIES146 VIEWS· 20 Oct 2013, 16:50
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
20 Oct 2013, 16:50
#1
20 Oct 2013, 16:50#1

Published in the Roar

When Heyneke Meyer was named the national coach of South African rugby, with his staid kick-chase Bulls pedigree, the adjectives most used to describe him were ‘conservative’, ‘traditional’, ‘structured’, or ‘disciplined’.

But now, after his second season, he is thought of as ‘passionate’, ‘bold’, ‘a risk-taker’, and ‘attack-minded’.

His rabid pressbox demeanor, red-blooded, vein-popping howling of the anthem, the fireworks at Ellis Park, and endearingly honest, unvarnished press-room machine-gun delivery after matches have radically altered how the rugby world sees the man.

No one but Meyer and his inner circle knows how he truly interpreted the Boks’ showing in the Rugby Championship and, in particular, the meaning of Eden and Ellis Parks, as it translates to selection of an end of year tour (EOYT) squad, and a style of play on the EOYT.

Coach Meyer definitely believes in continuity. But he has shown tactical flexibility, and a real interest in teaching young players instead of waiting until they are fully formed by provincial coaches.

He should continue to expose youngsters to the Springbok culture, and experience top-flight Test rugby, in Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Paris, not only because he is thinking about the Rugby World Cup in 2015 in the same corner of the world, but because many of his experiments have worked.

No one seriously questions whether Willie le Roux or Siya Kolisi belong at the highest Test level any more.

On the other hand, there are world-class players returning to health who might be steadying influences in the face of what may be three very serious physical challenges by a powerful Welsh team, a difficult Scottish squad, and the mercurial but always dangerous French.

Last year, on a successful, but uninspiring tour, for his backs, coach Meyer selected fullbacks Jaco Taute and Zane Kirchner; utility backs Francois Hougaard and Patrick Lambie; outright wings JP Pietersen, Lionel Mapoe, Lwazi Mvovo, and Raymond Rhule; midfielders Juan de Jongh and Jean de Villiers; flyhalves Morne Steyn and Elton Jantjies; and scrumhalves Ruan Pienaar and Jano Vermaak.

Taute, de Jongh, and Hougaard have struggled with physical issues. Jantjies has been awful this year. Kirchner was poor at Ellis Park, but very good at Brisbane and Newlands.

Meyer seems to have a lot of faith in Kirchner, but I am hoping he lets us see Willie le Roux at 15 on this Tour, with Lambie getting more time at 10 (perhaps against Scotland and France) and brings Rhule, Cobus Reinach, the super-elusive Cheslin Kolbe, and the promising Stormer Damian De Allende.

Meyer seems to have settled on a pack. Last year, he had a few guys I do not see making it this year: Schalk Brits, Marcell Coetzee, and CJ van der Linde.

I am hoping we see Kolisi start a Test, with Willem Alberts suffering from that very bad neck injury at Ellis Park and in need of a serious rest and reconditioning. I’d take Pieter Labuschagne, as well.

Also, we need to see how some new props go (Lourens Adriaanse, Frans Malherbe, Pat Cilliers) and this may be the time to have a younger lock combination (in a Test or two) than NZ: Pieter-Steph Du Toit with Eben Etzebeth.

The composition of this squad may give us an inkling about coach Meyer’s mindset.

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
20 Oct 2013, 17:10
#2
20 Oct 2013, 17:10#2
 This article gives an opinion on some of the players debated on this forum.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
20 Oct 2013, 17:17
#3
20 Oct 2013, 17:17#3

In essence I agree with the article.  However, it should be borne in mind that a string of players like Morne Steyn, Kirchner and Alberts are all going to be 30 next year and they are not future propositions at all.   All three were  atrociously poor in defence at Ellis Park as well - and contributed in no small way to a Springbok loss that could have been avoided.  They are unlikely to improve performances at that age - as they are set in their ways and cannot change for the better.  

 

I am also getting worried about Jannie du Plessis - cannot see him making another two years to the WC - but we do have alternatives waiting to take over.

 

The other issue that could have an impact is that SARU give hints that NH club players should be weeded out or limited  and that could also put pay to the chances of some of the players to be retained in the squad.    

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
20 Oct 2013, 17:37
#4
20 Oct 2013, 17:37#4
@mikey,

those players may be 30, but RWC is the year after. are u of the opinion that no one of who will be 30+ next year should be playing for the Boks???

thanks to the RWC, rugby cycles are calculated in 4 year increments, so the term future propositions has no real bearing with those players, as they will only be 31 at the next RWC.

form and a realistic positives contribution towards the team is what those players should be judged on, and morne and even krichner has been decent for the Boks for most of the year.
not alberts though, has been slow with zero form and getting rid of him for any other loosie in SA will be a positive.
meyer should try alberts from the bench as an impact player, cos hes a dud as a starting player.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news