A few years ago, the Boks played the Wallabies in SA with a mostly B-team, while sending out most of the A-team to New Zealand to play the All Blacks. Rassie then flew out on the night, while the players had a rest before flying out. This time is different, the Boks play Australia twice in back-to-back weekends, with a one-week break. Then 2 tests in New Zealand on back-to-back weekends
Faced with broad criticism in this forum on his constant and consistent chopping and changing of players(in particular Kakkies the know all) Rassie once again names with a few exceptions a creditable starting line-up.
And instead of putting all his eggs in one basket he's shrewd enough to have a plan with a backup team(or a part back up team) armed with fresh legs who'll be heading to NZ two weeks ahead of time to acclimatize and overcome jetlag.
Like him or leave him his a lot smarter than the Goons on here.
Okay I’ll play….. so we are playing Ox, Marx, Wilco, Eben and Lomp at home against Oz. Who are we playing away against NZ that are better or at least equivalent?
What makes you think the players you've mentioned will be replaced.....they might for example come off the bench against NZ or they might not feature in the second test against Oz.
Once again Rassie seems to have left you stranded with his flexibility.
I know it's hard for the likes of you to keep up with Rassie thinking outside of the square non-conventional approach but in your own interest please stop with the anti Erasmus hate......the bones in your jaw must be searing with pain.
Here are your exact words Lackwit:
’to have a plan with a backup team(or a part back up team) armed with fresh legs who'll be heading to NZ two weeks ahead of time to acclimatize and overcome jetlag’
Pity this time you never had time to edit your post. So I ask you again.. who are the backup team or part of the team to replace the tight 5? And given there are 2 weeks between the second Aussie test and the first AB test, there is no difference in jet lag. The whole team will be heading out 2 weeks ahead of time.
Bet you thought there was no break before the NZ test which of course makes the whole send a squad out a week before the rest of the team a farce…3 weeks before the test… hahaha.
But I’m still curious, assuming there wasn’t a week’s gap, who were the tight 5 you would have played against NZ other than those playing against Oz
It's speculation. This is the 1st Aus test...we don't know how the team for the 2nd test will look...but, like you said...the break makes it possible to take the whole team a week earlier.
Sure, but unless it’s a wipe out, it will be hard to play something much different from the best team. The good news is, even if we do that they have 2 weeks to recover and get over any jet lag. Something Hysteria completely missed in her anxiety to attack posters she dislikes.
Embarrassing
"I know it's hard for the likes of you to keep up with Rassie thinking outside of the square non-conventional approach..."
I'm confused. Is the square approach conventional or non-conventional.
Using your words becoming a more perplexing task as you enter menopause, Denise?
"Once again Rassie seems to have left you stranded with his flexibility."
Okay, let's look at this.
Rassie has selected close to a full strength side to play the 1st OZ game. I'd say 80-85% are BIP(according to Rassie) picks.
Nobody knows if any players will be sent to NZ early and Shark makes a speculative post asking whether Rassie might do so.
But according to Denise, something that hasn't yet happened, has left Moz stranded.
Infallible logic from the board's most dishonest poster.
Quick, Denise, go and edit your post.
Catch a wake up, Rassie is a rugby guru.......a master of his sport. The pair of you pretend to know better on an inconsequential rugby forum. Rassie is on the world stage....where are you?
Get it into your heads that Rassie has the runs on the board, that he can pull up stumps right now and his records will last an eternity.
He has a plan, he always has one, from the sound of things it's not one you're capable of understanding.
All you have is a fat lip with a very limited audience.
What you want is for him to play his best team every week........it hasn't happened and won't happen and guess what with all the chopping and changing he's got the runs on the board. No coach has done likewise.
Point me to his failures.
"Catch a wake up, Rassie is a rugby guru.......a master of his sport. The pair of you pretend to know better on an inconsequential rugby forum. Rassie is on the world stage....where are you?"
It's called a rugby forum, where people have opinions. Do you know what definition of "forum" is. It doesn't seem so.
"He has a plan, he always has one, from the sound of things it's not one you're capable of understanding."
Absolute genius. Our coach had a plan. Thank you for sharing this insightful bit of crucial information with us. I'd always thought he lived day-to-day. This truly changes my perspective.
"What you want is for him to play his best team every week........it hasn't happened and won't happen and guess what with all the chopping and changing he's got the runs on the board. No coach has done likewise."
Really? I want the same BIP team every week? Thabks, I didn't know that's what I wanted. Kindly point me to any post of mine that states said.
Denise.
Now, care to elaborate on your actual words where you claim something that hasn't yet happened has left Moz stranded.
Dishonest Denise...the double D
;)
‘ backup team(or a part back up team) armed with fresh legs who'll be heading to NZ two weeks ahead of time to acclimatize and overcome jetlag’’……says Hysteria
So the rest of the team that played and will be on the plane with them will have jet lag?
Or are you proposing the non players leave on Saturday and the playing team leaves on Sunday…..hahaha.___yes that’s a stroke of genius. Brilliant Hysteria.
schplotttt!
Listen dimness
It happened om 2018 and it worked out well - so some fringe players were not on he plane together with neither the first players that left for New Zealand early - nor one late plane. If yu think that players like Libbok or Esterhuizen will even eb i New Zealsnd for the rest against the AB's - you must be further gone to dementia than we know your hatred of Erasmus and some key players has risen above levels.
Point out where the tactic was employed:
2018
Before number 7 dimness. 15 team members went the Monday before the mumber 6 match to New Zealand, They were afterwards jioined by 16 team members who playefd in the no 6 test - with the main team be added to by 8 players that played in the Aussie match. So of the 16 players who went to NZ after the Aussie match = only 8 were used in the match squad for the number 7 match;
.
MozartHall Of Famer
46,115 posts
Aug 12, 2025, 04:41
Okay I’ll play….. so we are playing Ox, Marx, Wilco, Eben and Lomp at home against Oz. Who are we playing away against NZ that are better or at least equivalent?
-----------
What I was thinking was that these players would play the first test, then be on the next flight to New Zealand while Rassie utilises a B-team for the 2nd Australia test. Rassie would then fly out to New Zealand on Saturday night of the 2nd test, like he did last time.
This time, it is 2 back-to-back tests in New Zealand, so it might. make even more sense to send over most of the A-team - especially forwards.
So Dimness the number 6 match was played in Australia after the number 7 match….the site reversed the numbering order.
So your whole description is nonsense. If players in the number 7 match were joined by players after the number 6 match, those players from the number 6 match hitched a ride on a Time Machine,
Just more fantasy, I won’t call it lies, from Simpleton Mike.
Shark your logic would have made sense if there was 2 weeks between the first Oz match and the NZ match. Given there is a rest week and a 3 week gap between the first Oz and NZ match, that seems too long to have a part of the squad isolated in NZ.
I think the last time Rassie did this, their were 2 weeks before the next New Zealand test. (after the first test was completed).
And in light of all this, where certain posters are fully aware of the timings, players...HISTORY...old Denise makes this comment.
"Once again Rassie seems to have left you stranded with his flexibility."
One can only but laugh.
"Stranded"
hahahahaha
‘Catch a wake up’ Plum.
When Fight Club came out, I went to watch it in the theatre.
Around half way through the film, Norton is handing out envelopes with assignments in them for Fight Club members. These assignments were all about doing things you wouldn't normally do, to show you that most of your boundaries are mental constructs that work too well in keeping you pacified.
At the point, the guy in front of me leans over to his girlfriend and say "salaries", to which i see her nod her head.
If he thought those were salaries Norton was handing out, then all this amazing film was to him was lights and sound.
That word "stranded", that Denise used, that's her version of "salaries".
I'm sitting here with an espresso, chuckling to myself, thinking that Denise will read this and think "Lights and sound. Well, I do love a stage darling."
Imagine being sad enough to go watch fight club
Grow the fuck up you pathetic twat
Fuck me you wax lyrical over some pathetic gaming you are into - how fucking old are you
Get a fucking life Buttplug you absolute loser
Get a f******** life Buttplug Kakkies you absolute loser
He has one, right here, on a message board.
Dave...you know I'm talking about the movie Fight Club?
You're incapable of posting a pic on a forum. Most games would be well beyond your intellectual reach.
Poor old Dave, lovely man, sells ice cream
lol
I'm still not sure how I'm supposed to feel ashamed of going to see Fight Club.
I mean, its ranked 13th on IMDb's op 250 list.
It ranks very highly on almost every list out there.
From this " https://www.reddit.com/r/fightclub/comments/17v4r1b/why_fight_club_is_the_best_movie_ever_made_a/ " Reddit post, talking about just one of the numerous themes explored in the film;
Masculinity and femininity; Fight club discusses how these two concepts interact with each other both in individual persons and in society as a whole. We have the Narrator as an example of perverted masculinity, an emasculated man living in an emasculated society, yearning for masculinity and the healthy completion of self through unity with the feminine (a woman). We have Marla as an example of perverted femininity, encompassing all the toxicity of the feminine ideal – chaos, destruction of self, attention seeking (see my other post here: , seeking the completion of self through the union with the masculine, a very toxic masculine in this case."
Particularly interesting that this film is now 26 years-old and here we are living in woke 2025.
Mr Gelato was just a little flustered when he made that comment, so I'll not hold him to an explanation of what about going to see that film made me a loser.
Fight Club is a Classic Movie. It makes you Question your own relationship with materialism.
It shows the pros and cons of Anti Establishment groups. The pros and cons of rejecting consumerism but replacing it with violent extremism.
The Movie Style is unique and of a Timeless nature. Nothing to be ashamed of Plum:)
Good discussion until Dave got involved and then everything went south.
I hope he sent the A team to NZ
Lol
At this stage, the D team is better than the A team. With all the musical chairs and aging players in the squad it remains to be seen if anyone is the A team.