Willemse is absolutely not a fullback....
Mozart
How purposeful was that pass that Willemse intercepted and scored a try from? And why was the purposeful player subbed at minute 51?
I can think of a dozen total flops you have supported in the past and even now support.. I am not defending De Allende I merely looked at your flawed and prejudiced comments not to believe what you carry on about.
I can think of a dozen total flops you have supported in the past and even now support.. I am not defending De Allende I merely looked at your flawed and prejudiced comments not to believe what you carry on about.
By the way why was the purposeful player subbed at minute 51 ? You did not provide an excise for that.
Mozart
Nice try - let me tell you the home truth - because Esterhuizen did squat of value today and they were forced to see whether a sub would not make a difference, All the stats - which you misinterpreted anyway - confirms the reason for his subbing,
I agree, Willemse is not the answer at fullback.
As per Esterhuizen? He got runners free out wide and carried strongly. Also defended well aside from two misses. Did more than Damian despite the Stormers severely stifling Shark possession for most of the game. What platform did the Shark backs have? It was atrociously poor.
Damian had four or so carries, got turned over, was barely present on defence, created no opportunities for anyone. On one particular run in the second half, he has three players outside him, yet bee-lines for the touchline, cramping all of the players into a big pile, nearly going out for a lineout. He was anonymous for very large stretches of that game. Poorly defended in space.
Silly Billy
Your precious Andre made just too many mistakes and was subbed at minute 51 because he was useless. That pass to give the Stormers the lead was just one of those and his defense was putrid, I failed to see any instance that support the rest of your fairy tale statements,
Mozart
I would agree with you about playing Willemse at center - whether at 12 or 13 is debatable.
Mike ... I see you improved on last weeks zero score with a minus 60 for this round.
Congrats. Didn't realize it was possible but you seem to have found a way.
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaaa!!
Just a heads-up ... try moving forward with your score ... not backward ... I think that's the purpose of it all ...
Nah .. let's not play Willemse at all ... not for the Boks anyway ... he's just another hyped up quota ...
We already have enough of those ...
No CC
I was disqualified because they decided that Folau was on a bye and De Jager was not selected - none of the two players were marked as not selectable in advance and that is BS. I am out of that competition.
The only reason you would have been disqualified for the round is if you didn't have a full squad of 28 ... you knew that ... we spoke to you about it last week ... but it seems you were determined to find an excuse not to play ... and now you've latched on to a feeble one that's not valid.
Never had you pegged for a quitter ...
No matter ... you scored a zero in the last round ... and with this weekends -60 you might as well call it a day and resign.
Stubborn old fool ...Play Willemse at flyhalf and Leyds at 15.
Keep Duplessis at 13 and Coetzee at number eight!
Seargel Pietersen will be exposed defensively as the competition continues.
Stormers backline needs more creativity
Mike you are free to play or not so don't worry about what wee cc says!
Too many mistakes? What were these mistakes? Intercept aside, name them.
Added to that. Tell me what Damian did in the first 60 minutes.


