and not a peep from the board and for a not so strange reason PSDT is the centre of attention for allegedly the same offence. Watch the replay again to see a blunder in its most basic form to realise how much worse his is as compared to any other. With two players on his RHS and air to beat all he had to do was look right and pass the ball. Basic and simple. An open tryline left begging. This from a seasoned professional.
Shame!
Allegedly?
Go forward about 40 seconds and you’ll see Dud Toit get the ball…Kolbe is wide open to his left, not even an Oz player in frame. The wing comes in to take Dud. And goes below the waist. A pass to Kolbe was easy peasy…,but Dud is overpowered by the wing and ends up turning inside, instead of passing to the wide open man outside him. Then realizing his error he backhands a forward pass
Alleged…if you can review the Willie incident which nobody is defending, why can’t you review the Dud incident.
It’s the same thing. A pass wasn’t made to a player in a try scoring position. In the Willie case because he made a rare mental error…,in the Dud case because he simply wasn’t alert enough. Quick hands and that ball could have gone straight on to Kolbe for an easy try. If he wasn’t up to that he could have reset possession and from there we would probably have scored.
Den, we all know you enjoy posting stuff that gets reaction.
But why focus on all the negative stuff?
Denny
You know Mozart would try and destroy anything positive and find a negative in it. The man is crazy - so do not help him to become crazier. His latest craze - noticeable since 2019 is to discover scoring opportunities when in act there was none and then start writng BS about it.
Springbok lock one on one against an Australian wing 5 metres from the Oz line and he can’t get a legal pass away to his wing who is wide open 5 metres away. And that’s a 9.5 performance? Give me a break.
The most amazing thing about this incident is it was never mentioned again in the commentary and probably wouldn’t even have been noted by most posters if I hadn’t pointed it out.
There are specs for myopia, long sightedness and among Bok fans there are selective specs.
That perhaps could bbe s try scoring opportunity with Du Toit oner to the d=sideline and isolatted. H tries to get the ball back into the playing field - but was unsuccessful. That is what really happened. The so-called line out try from a line - out 16 meters away from the tryline wwas pure Mozart BS. Tell us again who is the line-out captain? He came up with the myth that yhe throwin depends on were the flyhalf moved - sure he scrummie often tell the Hooker where the ball shoud eb thrown and he rarely takes up the real position - he moved when the ball leaves he hand of the hooker - otherwise it is a dead give-away. In any eventthe whole story was BSD you invented. Stupid and getting more stupid as thee story goes on.
. .
Drivel alert
Whe youa re cornered writing BS onn site it becomes according to you divel alert/ A coward never admittig defeat in any discusssion. Being a coward and liar is your only real comributions to the site.
Very difficult and not rezally a line out mess-up as Matfild made in 2014 five meters out, It is like many ther isntances happening in rugby can be desribed as a real try scoring opportunity - it is just what [people like you woud call a tr-scoring opportunity - nobody else woud call it that - piss po thinking. . By the way how many mauls turned up in tests starting 16 meters resulting in tries scored?