windpomps conspiracy theory

My source tells me that ou windpomp believes that John Smit ran the sharkies last year much like the senior players ran the Boks under ou pdv.

Hahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahha. Clearly ou windpomp imagines that Plumtree is a dunce like ou pdv. This from the oak who cannot conceive of match fixing/conspiracies in rugby!!!!

Sorry to pop your bubble windpmp but Plumtree is a genuine coach and no ways is he going to allow that.

Nice one windpomp. I also recall how much mirth my comments re smit and matfield running the Boks to suit themselves got until of course it all came to light - hence Bissie on the bench etc. I said thsi was unhealthy  - Astute call by Beeno!

Either you or your source are lying through you/his teeth.

Okay explain what you were trying t osay. You seem worried you would take flak for your comments. No lies now  please windpomp just the good old truth.

You are of course welcome to speculate but I trust you do realise that saying match fixing/conspiracy is childish, rediculous etc makes you look rediculous yourself!  You sound like the flea brain bedpan and his "lies Beeno lies" comment. Still yapping away as always. You could mention to ou bedpan that I submitted a post on Keo attemptingto put Keo right about the queens. Bwahahahahaha ou flea brain wrong once more - nothing changes!

Will the light dawn for windpomp.

Ou Beenbal, I will go one better, and instead of explaining, I will quote what I hav said, and then see if you can understand what I was saying.

This is what I have said, according to you and/or your source:

My source tells me that ou windpomp believes that John Smit ran the sharkies last year much like the senior players ran the Boks under ou pdv.

This is what I have said:

The Sharks are struggling and Plum seems to be loosing it. I may get a few klappe, but I have a theory. Johns Smit was not officially the captain last year, but I am sure that, behind the scenes he played a major leadership role, and in a way, could well have been carrying Plum in the same way that he and the other senior players "carried" Twakkies.

Now you tell me what I meant, and then I will point out where you are wrong.

 Why don't you two just get a room and get over it already!

You tell me where my take was wrong. Your hilarious thoery is that just as smit and matfield ran the bokke under ou pdv. a simialr thing happened with John and Plumtree.

To quote - "could well have been carrying Plum in the same way that he and the other senior players "carried" Twakkies. 

Case closed. End of story and QED squared.

Lunatic ou windpomp comes here for some coaching and an explanation of what the rules mean. Bwahahahahhahahahahahahahaha  - moonie worrie nie ou windpomp likes the repartee - if he knows what repartee means! hehehhehehe

Your reading and comprehension is as crap as your writing and grammar ou swaer. Case closed.

Therer are two parts to what I have said, and I even highlighted it for you, and yet, you still missed it:

1. "John Smit was not officially the captain last year, but I am sure that, behind the scenes he played a major leadership role............................... "

Meaning: He was not officially the captain. He could not because ou Plumtree could not accommodate him and the "best hooker in world rugby". The one who cannot throw the ball straight into a line out and who gives away one penalty after the other. Despite him not being the captain, hye still played a major role as far as leadership within the team is concerned.

2. "..............and in a way, could well have been carrying Plum in the same way that he and the other senior players "carried" Twakkies."

Meaning: The main issue here is one single word............... "could". In other words, in my opinion, it is just possible that he could have. The Sharks are at the moment, i.e. since the departure of John Smit, in a crappy position. Their captain is IMO not captaining the side. He is playing his heart out as a player, and that is it.  They have no real core of leadership in the team, and the captain is not a strong enough leader.

Now go get your toys and find something to keep you busy with.

Or better still, go read the rugby lawbook. It may come in handy at some stage.

Well simarly windpomp, there could be match fixing and a conspiracy. John could have been carrying Plumtree as the senior players carried ou pdv. Only quoting you windpomp. Only your scenario looks a lot more unlikely.

Bwahahahahahahahaha  - and please dont bother to read the rule book as ya don't understand what it says!!!  Only read it if you intend asking me to intepret it for you! Otherwise chaos reigns.

Case closed.

There is a big difference between: "John Smit could have been carrying......................." and:

Lawrence was fired because of the RWC QF, and

Marius Jonker is a Bulle ref, and

Craig Joubert was favouring NZ because of bribery and corruption,

etc, etc.