SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
30 Sept 2014, 14:57#2
Mike one has to wonder why you keep directing posts at Moffie?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Sept 2014, 15:23#3
Obviously to get the real scoop Dave, I invite you to do the same thing.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Sept 2014, 16:21#4
Mozart
Still waiting for your opinion on this crucial issue.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
30 Sept 2014, 17:48#5
Yeah Moffie.......i'll ask when I need some advice on tighthead props!!!
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
30 Sept 2014, 20:06#6
Just to put some perspective on that, until a few months ago . . . before I set him straight . . . Moffie though the tighthead wore the #1 jersey and the loosehead wore the #3.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahhahaha!
I kid you not!
That gives you some idea of Moffie's "insights" into the front row.
Saffex, in truth, you also direct a lot of questions towards Moffie and I've often wanted to ask you why you bother. The only value Moffie adds to every rugby message board he's been on is comic relief.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Sept 2014, 20:14#7
The problem here is that Mozart does not want to answer the question. Remember he supports Jannie - accoring to him our National Treasure and Matfield all out - they are according to him the best. There are two issues here - which he does not want to admit, namely -
* That Jannie has gon backards by leaps and bounds over the past year; and* That Matfield has no grunt and his contribution to scrumming is virtually non-exitent.
Matter of fact the only real changes to the scrums have been Matfield - replacing Juandre Kruger at lock - and Fat and Lazy Alberts being replaced by a real loosie. The flanks role in scrumming is peripheral - it depends on the Tight 5 more than anything else - but w do not have a Tight 5 - we have a Tight 4.
CLclevermike
Coach57,555 posts
CLclevermikeCoach57,555 posts
30 Sept 2014, 20:14#8
The problem here is that Mozart does not want to answer the question. Remember he supports Jannie - accoring to him our National Treasure and Matfield all out - they are according to him the best. There are two issues here - which he does not want to admit, namely -
* That Jannie has gon backards by leaps and bounds over the past year; and* That Matfield has no grunt and his contribution to scrumming is virtually non-exitent.
Matter of fact the only real changes to the scrums have been Matfield - replacing Juandre Kruger at lock - and Fat and Lazy Alberts being replaced by a real loosie. The flanks role in scrumming is peripheral - it depends on the Tight 5 more than anything else - but w do not have a Tight 5 - we have a Tight 4.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
30 Sept 2014, 20:15#9
So says the noodle who believes the universe created itself from nothing!!!! bwahahahahahahaha
We all transpose figures at times. Man I was roasted by some very dumb oaks because I posted Solly & tybilika in error. Those very dumb twits insisted that I thought there two people. Man it was hilarious!! I am sure Moz knows only too well the numbers players carry for their positions.
Stop being silly rooitwit - if you can. Bwahahhahahahaha
30 Sept 2014, 20:17#10
@saffex
you playing tighthead now?
Times are bad eh?
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
30 Sept 2014, 20:20#11
Baboon-ou, show a bit of backbone for once and go back and find even one instance where I claimed the universe "created itself from nothing".
Just one instance . . . otherwise admit you're as big a liar as your hero Moffie.
Don't be a weak-arsed little coward now, your credibility depends on this.
PS If you'd like me to provide examples where I claim that matter always was and always will be thus no creation was ever necessary, just ask.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
30 Sept 2014, 20:20#12
Chip chip you losing the plot?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
01 Oct 2014, 05:06#13
Actually OOm, apart from the Lions series when the Beast dominated and the Wales test when Steenkamp destroyed the Hair Bear....our scrum has been a neutral at best.Part of the reason NZ destroyed us in the 2003 RWC is Bezuidenhout got killed by Yoda...flexing Faan was struggling as well.
We haven't had a dominating tighthead in the professional era. In scrumming terms Jannie has been about as good as any. But these days he struggles to go the whole game.
Still we haven't one other tighthead who has proven they can survive even a few scrums....what I have seen from Malherbe and Marcel is depressing.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Oct 2014, 07:52#14
Rooitwit please dont tell me you are still clinging to the outdated eternal universe bit.
I thought you had at least grasped the fact that matter is not eternal!!! Bwahahahahahaou rooitwit is truly a darwinian dinossuar and hasnt even understood the current debate premises!!!
If that is your position rooitwit please write to Hawkin, Dawkin and Krauss etc and help them out of their hopeless position. Explain that they dont need to try and prove the universe created itself out of nothing and make such complete twits of themsleves.
Imaging oo rooitwit rocking the science establishment, nay the world by solving the problem! I could tell everyone I know ou rooitwit
What a joke ou rooitwit is.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
01 Oct 2014, 08:37#15
So Baboon, to translate what you said above, basically what you're saying is you cannot find a single instance of me claiming that matter was created from nothing but you don't quite have the guts to admit that you're a liar. Is that a fair summary?
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
01 Oct 2014, 08:54#16
Man rooitwit having updated you on the science I simply could not believe you were still thumping that old drum. Sorry I didnt credit you with being thats tupid. My mistake yes!
Are really maintaining your eternal matter nonsense dispite all my quotes re Hawkin, Dawkin and Krauss etc.
rooitwit you are soooo clueless!!!