Mozart - why no comments on the second ODI against England?

You were very quick to blame De Kock, Miller and Duminy for the loss of the first ODI, but totally silent on the second ODI.   Your comments will be sincerely appreciated  - especially as to the seven missed catches and who was involved.   
I am really looking forward to youe comments on the missed catch by  Amla in the slips - which in my opinion was the real reason for the loss.

CM I watched the highlights of the game and was shocked to see Amla's fielding contribution.
Shocking is, to put it mildly.
Proteas cannot afford such mistakes in the fielding side of the game especially when u only have AB, de Kock and Faf with Miller and Morris occasionally coming good to score runs.
P.ss poor performance from u knows who. 
Embarrassing . 
 

Actually Amla has outscored Faf, Miller and Morris in the series thus far.....are you suggesting we drop him because he dropped a sitter in the slips?

 Sure why not De Kock as well and what about that missed catch of Amla that was indeed a catch every school boy would have made?     

Except a school boy like you Perv who never played the game.

 This is another personal attack because the weirdo has no response.  What a mongrel ape we have here - sorry I do not m ean insulting apes by this comparison.  

Response to what poofter? State your question plainly.

 Actually Amla has outscored Faf, Miller and Morris in the series thus far.....
Farter has been banging on about Amla post after post for quite some time....nauseating stuff. Don't expect a response to your question from this most ignorant manipulative liar who knows as much about cricket as Coetzee knows about coaching rugby.
There were many fascinating aspects to the game, well to those who watched all of the game anyway but to Farter the single biggest thing was Amla's dropped catches, clearly obvious to anyone who watched the game. Not saying that Amla should not be criticized and to be honest the dropped catches proved costly but to be fair there were 5 dropped catches by four different players before the 25th over. As a matter of  fact it was a most uncharacteristic poor fielding performance.
Shyte happens, Farter.
All of that aside there was a chance to win the game from two of our biggest hitters having to score 10 runs off 10 balls.......highly gettable.
Moz, don't waste your time trying to educate fools.

 Mongrel Ape!!!???
Liewe bliksim Mike.

 
Seems Comrade is capable of coming up with something new.

I tried to google an image of a mongrel ape but sadly it seems they must be extinct as no pics w ere available.

Pity ... sounds like something one would find in a horror show ...

 or on this forum..... according to Mike.

Amla's cousin once again drags the site down to his level.
Simple Skollie style. If you don't get your way shout...Bigot....Racist....Liar.
What a dirt bag.
I honestly think that Amla needs a break from cricket. Perhaps spend some time with cousin Denny in Oz who will teach him the skills required to catch a ball.
But as that great all-star cricketer from District 6 says, thinks who else actually knows more about cricket than him.
No one.
What a guy!!!!!!!Now go and FY.

 Farter...you sound upset. Shame. It seems like I got under your skin again....silly me for upsetting a bitter little expat.
All that aside, how about answering Mozart's question?
Front up like a man for once, c'mon bigmouth... show us what you're made of.
I bet you can't.

 Denny
I just ask why Mozart denigrate Miller, De Kock and Duminy kept quiet about Amla and he went on a personal attack against me for asking a simple question. 
I give Amla credit wen credit is due - I also criticize him or anybody else when criticism is due.   And his missed catch deserve criticism.  
Funny how the bunch stayed quiet about that match-losing play.
I criticize players when they do qualify for such criticism - I do not lie about things and then hope  others will keep quiet.  When the opposite happen I do not turn personal like Mozart specializes in.  

 Mike I  find your headliner screamers pathetic and childish, now please find someone who cares about your attention seeking boring dumb  arguments.....I don't.

 There was nothing wrong about the question - nor the heading.   Mozart is extremely repetitive in any sportsman he disliked and is totally prejudiced - so why can he enver be objective in assessments.   Was just trying to get some objectivity from Mozart for a change - but no chance of that it seems to me.
I arranged with Mozart that we be civil in communication on this site - but he started with his pervert allegation again and all arrangments are gone as far as I am concerned,    He is a liar spreading that kind of libel with no proof whatsoever.   The man is a fraud and a vicious inhuman bastard.   

 
Objectivity isn't a word I'd use if I were you, Comrade.

Please dry up the tears. We've all seen your attacks on Mozart so there's no point in claiming innocence.

What an arse you are.

And here we have Moffie's Servile Gimps trying very hard to pretend that it's all one-way traffic and ou Maaik is the childish name-caller while Moffie is the mature and sensible victim.

LMAO!

The reality is that Moffie is the most spiteful, self-important and vindictive little child I've ever encountered in any walk of life and the fact that he surrounds himself with grovelling and fawning sychophants like Dense and Klown is all the proof anyone should need.

Ou Maaik may annoy a few people with his stubborness and his repetition but he adds a heck of a lot more value to this forum than any of Moffie's juvenile one-upmanship.

 
Like what?

Well his weekly team sheets for example.

Your turn now, give me an example of any value added by your odious and vengeful Master.

50/50 just want to know if u can understand what u read.
Does taking a break from cricket not sound like it reads........
Now if anyone on this site is guilty of not answering questions put to them you are outstanding at that plus attempting to deflect the issue by directing some stupid question to the person in return.
Oh, and by the way u do not get under my skin. Unfortunately, u are not the first Cape Skollie that I have had the displeasure of encountering.....u guys are everywhere and a hindrance and nuisance to all.
Cricket, rugby guru....u are not.
Weasel.  
P.S.Why don't u spend your time in a positive constructive manner instead of stirring at each turn?

Funny stuff, in comes Urinal for his usual attack from behind....but here's your chance to go on the record and support Mike who brings so much to this Board according to you. Do you also support dropping Amla from our 50 over team? A simple yes or no. Silence will be okay as well....we will just presume you support the fellow who.....hahaha.....gives so much.

 Amla reached 7000 runs in ODI's during his innings today....fastest ever to reach this milestone.

 
Master? LOL!!!

Shame, Redneck. You really are pissed that I'm siding with Mozart more so than with your sh!t for brains Comrade.

Team sheets? That's all you have?

I thought you were going to come up with something really stupendous ... but if teamsheets does it for you, then so be it. Team sheets it is. LOL!!

I'm not the one claiming that my Master Mozart's contributions are of a better quality than your Comrade's. You are ... and so far we've established that team sheets wins it for you.

What my master does do a lot better than Sh!tForBrains is bring about an assortment of subjects to debate about   ... some of which I've found rather interesting. 

Sh! tForBrains however doesn't have anything else to discuss ... other than the same old shyte in his every post ... and I suppose that's why I agree with you ... his best contribution is undoubtedly his team sheets.

Now if only he'd stick with that and leave the rest of the rugby discussions alone.

 Listen stupid BSter - find one thread where I suggested that Amla be dropped from the team.   You are a bloody liar personified.  At one stage I suggested that after Amla had some  low scores that he may be better utilized lower in the batting order - that was all I wrote about him.
Will you ever stops lying?

Great to see that stat on Amla and congratulations to him.
Stats are important for the record book only.
To me, it is more important to know how many times his performance has contributed to winning a series for the Proteas in ODI.
I mean contributions like AB and others have made when it counts.
It would be interesting to know that stat if anyone has that info.



 

This nonsense about Amla has been going on for 3 years! Three years of gnawing on the same bone.....it's frigging beyond comprehension. Here's a classic from 3 years ago when you suggested Amla should bat at 7 in our T20 team, perhaps the most absurd idea in the history of this forum: ......... Status: Hall Of Fame Posts: 15283 RE: JP Duminy March 26, 2014, 17:00:26 I read an article in Supersport about the SA approach to T20 games. They clainm that the problem is we do not follow the world trend and select big hitters for that version of the game. The one guy they mentioned was Amla - his run rate is tto slow for that version of the game. However, there seems to have been a problem in that regard. Because of Amla's slow starts it puts pressure on De Kock and he hits out at balls he should not hit at. De Kock is in fact the last player that should be considered for replacement - he had the second highest score in the SriLanka T20 game and the lack of runs early on against New Zealand was his downfall in that game. However, De Kock was not the only casualty of that problem in the New Zealand game He was quickly followed by AB and Du Plessis and later on by Miller. I would start by changing the batting order - opening with Faf and De Kock, and AB and Miller coming in at 3 and 4, followed by Duminy and Abie Morkel, Amla and the bowlers. I would seriously think about changing Morne and Tsotsobe as well. It does not look like Morne has adjusted well to sub-continent conditions yet. However, they are playing the netherlands tomorrow and I think they should giove Morne another rin - he will recover his mojo soon and needs game time. ........... Three frigging years of gnawing at a single bone. .....unfriggingbulievabull!

 Hell the old liar does not know the difference between  T20 games and ODI''s - but what else can one expect from the rabid idiot?

More gnawing ..... RE: Local knowledge needed.... October 28, 2014, 05:57:46 Please - it seems I opened a can of worms here. I have nothing against Amla - but thinks he is batting too slow at the start of the innings. By over 10 he still he normally is below 3 runs per over and that picks up later in the innings when he reached an average of 5 runs or better per over. All I am saying is that slow batting at the rate Amla entertains early in his innings put pressure on DE Kock - who has to bat at a rate of 6+ an over to ensure that the batting rpo is not too low.

More gnawing ..... Crcket item February 25, 2017, 03:40:59 One good score followed by 2 disasters. He made only 7 runs from 18 balls while De Kock made 34 from 33 balls. Amla must be careful - he is going the Graeme Smith way.

 Listen 0 I did never said Amla needs to be dropped  you lying drol = find somewhere where I said he should be dropped - you absolute liar.   You are rally are the worst BSter ever,   I am sick thinking that there is a dreg like you on this site. 

Gnawing away at Amla......you don't have the guts to come out and say he should be dropped, but you imply it with code like 'Amla must be careful- he is going the Graeme Smith way'. .. You fool nobody Old Rotten Fruit.

 Snake sh!t - you lied when you said I wanted Amla dropped and now  you come up with a unfounded supposition when I challenged you to produce a thread here I said it,   unfortunately there is not a prize for lying on this site - you would take that prize continuously.   No stop lying,
New the way you have been gnawing for three years that De Kock should be dropped and has never realized what an absolute fool you have made of yourself in the process.   Remember the near seizure you had after Graeme Smith was replaced by De Kock in the ODI team?

More gnawing, note Fruit's call to drop Faf. No doubt he would be next on his list to be replaced by a seuntjie....just as sure as Amla followed Smith. ... SA Cricket has called up some extra players for the second test after the latest fiasco. The team suggested in the news report in News24 is the following:- Stiaan van Zyl, Dean Elgar, Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, Rilee Rossouw, JP Duminy/Temba Bavuma, Quinton de Kock, Kagiso Rabada, Kyle Abbott, Dane Piedt, Morne Morkel I think they can do without Bavuma and Faf du Plessis and I think Amla and Duminy will have to pull up their socks drastically or they will have to go as well. Cricket is fare too politically orientated to allow for proper development of the sport in SA agree with AJ here.. 0 Likes

 Mozart
Stop bloody lying - the more you write the bigger the fool you are.   Smith  was dropped from the ODI squad for vey good reason and you keep on saying I wanted Amla dropped which you could not find in any of my posts.   Lying is a poor character reflection and you must be the pits in that respect,  
Apparently you - bloody fool - does not realize the difference between test, ODI and T20 cricket.  T ragic - but true. 

More gnawing on the retirement bone....and this one posted in December 2013 is a classic from the Perv. Pervie asks when sportsmen should retire, I suppose to make way for seuntjies....on other sports he posts: .. Other codes of sport Michael Phelps - the greatest swimmer ever - realized that the physical effort was harder and that the youngsters became a real threat to his aspirations. He quitted at the age of 27. That left Ryan Lochte in the competition - but he is not the same competitor he was two years ago and is often enough beaten by younger swimmers. Federer - the greatest tennis player ever - has not won anything of note in 2013 and the question is whether he should really not retire from professional tennis. Bolt has already indicated that he intends to retire - but the date has apparently not been set yet. ,,, Phelps whipped Mike seuntjie Le Toss 3 years after Pervie buried him. Federer won the Australian open 3 yearsafter Clever gave up on him....and Bolt won the Olympic 100 and 200 metres also nearly 3 years later. ... But they should have retired.....Lmaofy!

 Farter the Bigot stops short of saying Amla is only in the team because of the colour of his skin. He's been slagging off Amla for quite some time, the evidence is there for all to read in the sports section.
The dumbest and most ignorant commentator of cricket on this site starts off by shrieking......"Look what I saw in a highlights package.....Amla dropped two catches!"
Here are  some of the facts of ODI 2 that led to the demise of the team apart from Amla's dismal fielding performance.....
Phulukwayo leaked 22 runs in a crucial over, in total he went for 74 runs the most by any bowler from either team....7.4 runs per over.
Behardien, a quota player, bats at a snail's pace scoring 17 runs facing 25 balls when a run a ball should have been the minimum. Sickening if one considers the long tail of big hitters sitting in the shed straining to get out in the middle.
A total of 5 catches dropped spread between 4 players...all before the 25th over.
Two of the biggest hitters in the team fail to get the winning runs needing 10 runs from 10 balls!
Farter, I can help you get over your ignorance, unfortunately there's no help for your bigotry. Amla is an important cog in the Protea team, just by the by he put in a brilliant performance in the most recent IPL scoring 2 consecutive centuries, furthermore there is still no whitey his equal as an opener in South Africa in any format of the game. Sure he's coming to the end of his career but that said anyone who knows cricket acknowledges greatness when they see it, but then you don't know cricket....your sole purpose on here is to expel the bitterness of a failed expat. Gosh you must have had a great life in the old SA.... I feel your pain.
Go Hashim Amla!

 Denny
The critical miss was on Stoke who went on to score a century and the drop was critical in the course of the game.   The way that miss occurred was so bad - the ball went between his legs and ended up as a four.   Extra slow reaction, I never looked at te newspaper article you quoted and the observation was entirely mine.
I do not slag off players the way Mozart does and what I wrote is entirely based on fact and not fiction and prejudice.   In the process misrepresentation and outright lies are the norm with him.   Whenever he writes anything he does so without any regard to otcome and he was caught out lying too many times to enumerate, 
The man is snake sh!t  and to call him that is an insult to snake sh!t  -  he is far below that.            

"... the crucial miss"....
That's cricket.....shyte happens. Another crucial miss was having to score a mere 10 runs off 10 balls and that's with two big hitters at the crease.
But I've already said that....and I've pointed out several other lapses but go ahead an blame Amla for the entire loss. You'll make one other moron happy.