FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
NEWS / RUGBY

Kirwan, Matfield Slam Ref in Rugby Showdown

By 0 REPLIES
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
Kirwan, Matfield Slam Ref in Rugby Showdown
Post-match debates heated up as Victor Matfield and John Kirwan voiced their opinions on the officiating during the crucial Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry decider, where the Springboks triumphed over the All Blacks, securing a 3-1 series victory. The discourse unfolded on the Rugby Rivals podcast following the match at Baltimore’s M&T Bank Stadium.

John Kirwan initiated the discussion with a pointed question about the choice of referee.

"Let’s try and be objective about this. Why would you put a northern hemisphere ref in charge of a southern hemisphere game? Forget the results – you guys deserve to win. Across the series you were the better side. It came down to the wire. But this ref has the ability to just make the game pedantic."

Victor Matfield responded, questioning the referee’s decision-making, particularly at crucial moments.

"I thought he didn’t want to make calls. I don’t know if you’d say ‘pedantic’ – I thought there were quite a few turnovers at breakdown time where he didn’t want to give them to us. There was one where Deon [Fourie] definitely had it, where you guys got the penalty."

Matfield also commented on the technical difficulties and injuries that affected the game's pace. "In some circumstances, the earpiece that didn’t work slowed him down, and then there were quite a few injuries, quite a few blood injuries, so that just slowed it down. But I thought all the decisions they made with the TMO were spot on, 100%."

Kirwan agreed on the spirit of the series but continued to express concerns over the refereeing at the breakdown. "I totally agree with Victor about the game, about the love we have for each other and the boys praying. I think it’s amazing. But the refs make a massive difference and they need to get better. For example, I thought that South Africa at the breakdown were really, really on the limit. They never released the player. They stuck onto the player and they slowed the ball down, and the ref let them do it."

He further critiqued the referee’s timing in enforcing rules.

"Now, if the referee’s any good, in the first five minutes he penalises that and no one does it. But he waited until the last five minutes to penalise for coming in on the lineout too close, and for hanging on to the player and not releasing him in the tackle. What frustrates me is that it changes the game for everybody, so it doesn’t make it a fair contest."

Matfield suggested teams should prepare based on the referee’s style. "I can remember when we played, whenever you had Nigel Owens as a referee, he just wanted to let the game go. He’s not going to blow. I also think you need to look at the referees, analyse them, know what their strengths are, know how they want to blow the game, and you have to adapt to that."

This discourse highlights the critical role referees play in the dynamic and outcome of international rugby contests, underscoring the necessity for transparency and consistency in officiating, to maintain the integrity and fairness of the sport.

— END OF COMMENTS —

More from the Forum

More news