FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
NEWS / RUGBY

Super XV log farce

By ruckers admin· 12 Mar 2012, 00:0011 REPLIES230 VIEWS
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN

Hi Ruckers

 

We don't usually post subjective items on the board, but has anyone noticed the log farce that is going on?

SARUGBY.COM has the Stormers in second spot and the Highlanders in 3rd.

That, according to log rules is spot on, as the team with the higher points difference should be ranked higher.

 

However some sites have the Highlanders in second spot ahead of the Stormers.

 

Now we have been debating the reasons for this over the past 2 days.

 

So we've decided to open it up to our Ruckers...

 

Do you see any logical reason why the Highlanders should be ranked ahead of the Stormers on the log?

 

Looking forward to the replies.

 

Regards

Ed

Reader comments

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
12 Mar 2012, 12:06
#2
12 Mar 2012, 12:06#2

In principle the highlandes should not ever be ranked higher than the Mighty Sstormers !!!!!!

I think the  only thing that makes sense is apply the rules. We have a higher points differential so should be higher.

Those squaking about the fact we have played only two games must realise in the end this all evens out. To have the highlanders ahead unnecessarily complicates things.

SB
sitting bullClub Pro170 posts
12 Mar 2012, 12:08
#3
12 Mar 2012, 12:08#3

...kiwis naturally ranked above yarpy teams..something to do with us always kicking your butt..

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
12 Mar 2012, 12:13
#4
12 Mar 2012, 12:13#4

The Highlanders played 3 games and "earned" the points they have. The Stormers have only played 2 and received 4 of the points that they have, in the same way that any team "receives" 4 points for a bye.

HA
hakwaPro4,146 posts
12 Mar 2012, 12:17
#5
12 Mar 2012, 12:17#5

 and come and input on my topic "Are the Highlanders the real deal?" I thought I might put that out there!

CH
ChippoPro3,372 posts
12 Mar 2012, 16:53
#6
12 Mar 2012, 16:53#6

Thought i was the only one that noticed.

 

Since  the beginning of time, teams with higher points diference are always rankned higher, no matter how many games have been played.

 

What a total load of shit.

Even supersport.com has it wrong.

 

LOLOLOL well done sarugby! You got it right along with superxv and rugby365

 

as for the rest... laughable!

 

Imagine it came down to the last game of the season and some sites had the log all wrong?

 

haha we'd have every sheep shagger and stormer up in arms!

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
12 Mar 2012, 17:03
#7
12 Mar 2012, 17:03#7

Well said Chippo I think you blew them all away. Trust ou windpomp to get it wrong!! 

Go and look up the word always sitting bullduster!  Then come back and tell me what you have learnt.

CH
ChippoPro3,372 posts
12 Mar 2012, 17:41
#8
12 Mar 2012, 17:41#8

what do you mean "Go and look up the word always sitting bullduster"??

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Mar 2012, 11:58
#9
13 Mar 2012, 11:58#9

Chippo
Member
Posts: 73
RE: Super XV log farce
March 12, 2012, 16:53:05


LOLOLOL well done sarugby! You got it right along with superxv and rugby365

 

Wrong. SARugby, SuperXV and Rugby365 did not get it right. Go to the official SANZAR website. Thier rules, their application of it. This is where you can find the official log.

 

www.sanzarrugby.com/superrugby/


BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Mar 2012, 12:16
#10
13 Mar 2012, 12:16#10

Chippo sitting bull thinks nz always kicks our butts. Hence he has no idea of the meaning of always.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
13 Mar 2012, 12:31
#11
13 Mar 2012, 12:31#11

Windpomp I took a quick look at the SANZAR site and note the Stormers are in third position. However are SANZAR applying their own rules correctly?

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
13 Mar 2012, 14:03
#12
13 Mar 2012, 14:03#12

OK, so you got that right then. You checked on the official SANZAR site, as I suggested, and you noted that SANZAR have got the Highlanders above the Stormers and not the other way round as some people would have liked it to be. Now try the next step. Get the rules about how it is decided what the correct order should be and then decide. My guess is that SANZAR has decided how it should be decided, so I can see no reason why they would do it otherwise.

 

IMO it only makes sense that a team who has 12 points from three games and have earned those 12 points by playing should be placed above a team who has earned 8 points in two games and then received 4 points for a bye.

— END OF COMMENTS —

More from Rugby

More news