Gardner shared his insights on the Rugby Unity podcast, emphasizing the league's efforts to balance traditional gameplay with increased fluidity. "One of the perennial points that we always come back to is that tension between balance and flow. Super Rugby has really tried to promote in its product is the flow piece,” he explained. The adaptations over recent seasons, including playing on for minor injuries, altering the 50/22 law, and introducing a free-kick for late joins at the box-kick, are all designed to minimize stoppages and boost the game's tempo.
"We’re actually looking for opportunities to get the game back up and operational rather than necessarily going to a scrum."
These changes have sparked debate among the rugby community, particularly around the role of scrums. Critics argue that these innovations could undermine this crucial set-piece. However, Gardner believes these modifications have enriched Super Rugby's appeal, aligning with the league's strategy to maintain game momentum and enhance scoring opportunities. "I know for rugby purists that might be at odds with how they see the game but one of the things that we’ve been asked to do as referees in Super Rugby is really buy into the product of looking for reasons to keep the game going, looking for opportunities to award tries and looking to reward game momentum," he stated.
The broader acceptance of these rule changes by World Rugby, however, remains uncertain. After the Shape of the Game summit, it was clear that nations like South Africa and France are committed to preserving rugby's traditional elements, such as the scrum, opposing the views of Australia and New Zealand who favor further reducing its power. The standoff means no new laws will be trialled internationally this year.
Gardner highlighted the challenges of aligning international perspectives, "The challenge at international level is because there are so many different countries involved at the World Rugby level, how do you achieve greater alignment around the clarity and the tension between accuracy versus flow? I think that’s a real challenge at international level." This statement encapsulates the ongoing struggle within the sport to find a balance that satisfies all stakeholders while continuing to innovate and attract new fans.
The dialogue surrounding these law changes is a testament to the ever-evolving nature of rugby, reflecting a sport that respects its roots while daring to reimagine its future.