CRCrusadersfan
Pro3,099 posts
CRCrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
07 Jun 2023, 16:07#6
Your nonsense holds no fear to me beenshit, you can rant and rave as much as you like, you and your insane beliefs are a bloody sick joke which just makes people pity you.
If there is a loving God surely he will judge people on their actions not their beliefs and if such a God exists I think you will find I will get a pass while the devil will be tickling your balls for being such a hate filled prick. Now wouldn't that be a something.
But I will put in a word for you simply because I wouldn't want to see anyone suffer eternal torture even such a buffoon as you.
STStavanger1
Pro4,532 posts
07 Jun 2023, 20:50#12
Nothing is lost on me...
I think it is.
you never swear.
I'm Irish of course I swear.
yet you chose to cal Jusus a C because Beenz got to you
I don't believe in Beeno's god or any god. If that one in a gazillion x gazillion chance a god happens to exists and shares Beeno's disgusting, vile and hate filled beliefs than yes I think I would think he's a C with capital C and that's regardless of whether his name is Jesus or something else. As for Beeno getting to me...LOL.
.no irony, just unfiltered hate for an idea you don't even believe in...
Hate, how can I hate something I don't believe in?
stop bullshitting yourself.
Sounding like a religious person who's convinced that non religious people spend all their time struggling with the the question of whether there's a god or not. Sorry we just don't.
PLPlum
Captain21,007 posts
08 Jun 2023, 09:11#15
More and more posts of complete idiots thinking they could speak on what the mind and purpose of a supreme being could and should be.
It's like a monkey thinking that he understands a diesel engine and declaring it worthless.
I'm going to type this in CAPS, perhaps that way you'll pay attention.
IF A SUPREME BEING EXISTS, THEN HIS IQ IS FAR BEYOND ANYTHING YOU COULD COMPREHEND.
I'm so fucking sure that I have to dumb this down for you but I'm not going to because no matter how much dumbing down I do, I know that it's going to fly completely over your heads.
The problem is that you're all far too weak minded to approach the topic of a potential supreme being in its correct philosophical context and as such, and as usual, all your rants amount to is a bunch of low grade heel snapping that every 12 year-old has considered and already put to bed.
I don't care if you do or don't believe in something.
What annoys me is the pathetically stupid arguments you guys make.
It's like you're putting your meagre IQs out there for the world to see and expecting the most insignificant of mental achievements to be respected.
And you keep doing it, over and over, flapping your stupid gums and never really saying anything of significance.
What I'd love to know is how you don't see how pathetic it all is?
SHsharkbok
Captain23,199 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,199 posts
08 Jun 2023, 09:49#16
Does anyone have a gibberish interpreter to explain what ButtPlug is trying to convey?
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
08 Jun 2023, 13:53#23
What Plum says is totally logical. If there is a supreme being capable of creating and controlling the entire universe, his mental capacity would be immense, completely incomprehensible to us. And yet the ideas attributed to god in the Bible are meant to be accessible. So one concludes we should be able to communicate at some level with a supreme being, but that levels exist that are simply beyond us.
That’s in the one corner. In the other corner we have natural forces like evolution, gravity, the Big Bang etc. Easier to understand, but still missing any credible explanation of existence itself.
Which leaves the debate in an inconclusive place, for each individual to decide for himself. And nobody’s opinions carry more weight. Einstein may be the smartest man we know about….but the degree to which he exceeds normal mortal intelligence is an infinitesimal fraction of the degree to which a supreme being’s intelligence would exceed his.
Einstein would no more understand a supreme being than a normal mortal. Which leaves us in the place that all opinions should be respected and not mocked. Nobody knows.
SHsharkbok
Captain23,199 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,199 posts
08 Jun 2023, 13:59#24
Did anyone suggest that "if" a creator existed, it would not be intelligent? No...
ButtPlug often talks to himself in "debates" creating counter-arguments to non-existent positions.
ButtPlug: "Don't put the kettle in the fridge during the day".
Another person: "I never suggested putting the kettle in the fridge - in the day or night".
ButtPlug: "If you stand in the rain, you will get wet".
Another person: "Really...FFS".
Although let's not forget that Plum is a respected intellectual on Reddit, with 12-year-olds...
I don't see anyone saying that an ultimate creator is impossible- but that does not make it a fact.
Many people are happy to accept it as an unknown - e.g. not proven or disproven.
However, even if a supreme creator does exist- that does not prove that "1" religion is correct.
For all we know, a supreme creator may be disgusted with Arab and Christian religions.
Religion is an opinion. If you go into a debate about philosophy and regurgitate the religious perspective - it is nothing that has not been heard before. Same old, same old...
It is not a debate, it is just a believer insisting their lack of understanding proves a supreme being.
If Einstein had followed the mainstream religious herd (at the time) - he would never have taken physics beyond what it already was. It was a questioning nature that challenged dogma and disproved it and took mankind's understanding of reality further.
Religion is a placeholder for people that don't want to think. While is probably served a purpose thousands of years ago - today it is just a means to control dumb people.Look at Russia. Somehow they see Putin as a Messiah .
PLPlum
Captain21,007 posts
09 Jun 2023, 11:29#27
Geez, Sader.
Let's try a different tact...
For arguments sake, assume that an omnipotent being created the universe.
And just to simplify it, leave out everything else that religion says about the creator.
If the creator's mental ability is at 100%...what percentage would you give yourself?
Consider that such a creator would know everything last thing about the universe and everything in it.
Does your mind contain all the information required to asses whether the creator's creation is going to plan?
Would you be able to speak on why the creator spawned creation?
There are more questions that I could ask you, but I think you see the point.
You are arguing against an omnipotent creator, without addressing what such a being would be capable of.
You are also failing to measure yourself against him/it. And that is something you have to do if you want argue logically.
Now, how do you measure yourself against an infinite power?
Tell me if you can follow what I'm about to say now...
To measure oneself against and omnipotent being, you have to look inward, at your own ability, thoughts, desires and emotions...not outward. Does that make sense?
Again, I'm not preaching to you, I'm not religious.
I merely telling you that to argue your corner, in this particular instance, you have to measure what is within and not what is outside of your body. The hypothetical case for a creator presents you with infinity. And gazing into infinity is not gonna bring you anywhere. So you have to look within...ask yourself how close are you to infinite knowledge and power?
Once you have given yourself a rating as compared to the 100%(yes, I know that you can't place a percentage on infinity) an omnipotent being would have...you have to re-evaluate your arguments and thoughts.
For example...
"Children suffer and thus God is cruel."
You see their suffering...but what else do you know? What else do you understand about their suffering and the context in which an omnipotent creator caused such suffering...and for what reason?
Look, I'm not particularly happy with the religious explanation for suffering either.
But I have to zoom out and ask myself, if somebody did make all of this...am I sure that I can judge the creator based on suffering?
Again, this is hypothetical, but you have to steel-man these arguments if ever your going to get anywhere.
What if that suffering is an infinitely small part of an eternal existence?
What if those children that are suffering are souls that were Hitlers in previous life?
What if that suffering is bootcamp for a far greater existence?
What if this life is a simulation and those suffers chose that life because their real self exists outside of the suffering and in their world picking a character that suffers is "cool"? Seems stupid...but people play very difficult video games that are mainly comprised of extremely difficult scenarios and are headache inducing...
That's how you have to approach these things.
To attempt to a judge an omnipotent being is not gonna get you anywhere.
Judge yourself instead.
PLPlum
Captain21,007 posts
09 Jun 2023, 11:50#28
FishNuts...for the umpteenth time, you are arguing against religious people but taking the long way round to simply say "bullshit".
The "just because" argument is as shallow as a dry river bed.
Just because the smartest man on earth writes down his best equation on a piece of paper, it doesn't mean it'll change world. Yea, but just because you say so, doesn't mean it won't change the world. Yes but just because you say that I say just because, doesn't mean it will change the world. Yeah, but just because...
So damn stupid.
A creator either does or doesn't exist.
Now, isn't there a famous principle that we can apply to a situation where there are two options but nobody knows which is the correct one?
You're the idiot arguing that the cat(God) in the box is dead(non-existent), and to make it worse you're appearing very smug while doing so.
Your intelligence is almost as shallow as your personality.
I know that you'll never figure out why it's interesting to place God into Schrödinger's though experiment.
We go back to our "omnipotent" being hypothesis and we assume that God would be in all quantum sates at the same time...since omnipotence would stretch across all realities.
IE A quantum superposition...
Hahaha I'm actually laughing balls off as I type this because I just know that I lost you so very quickly there.
Hahaha you tool.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
09 Jun 2023, 13:52#34
So despite the fact that religion was the organizing force for 99.99999% of human history, you think it has caused more harm than good.
Those nuns must really have given you a hard time,
STStavanger1
Pro4,532 posts
09 Jun 2023, 16:18#40
Where was I arguing against religion again?