Plum, Big Tech and Trump’s EO

I cannot the title of the thread where you challenged Sharkbok on Google, Twitter, etc. 

I am a subscriber of a YouTube channel called Viva Frei. He is a Canadian Lawyer. He had a clip where he had a chat with an American lawyer, Robert Barnes, where they discussed the Flynn case. 

I decided to check out Barnes’ channel and found that he posted a clip on the 29th on his own channel, on the Twitter/big tech executive order subject, as well as other legal issues in the news. 

Before I post the clips, some info from Barnes’ Wikipedia page:

In 1992, he became the personal attorney of Hillary Clinton (per her memoir) and assisted the Clintons when their aide Vince Fostercommitted suicide.[3] After criticism arose as to whether it was appropriate for Barnett to represent so many newscasters and journalists who were reporting on the White House while also serving as lawyer to the Clintons; Barnett resigned from representing the Clintons turning his work over to fellow Williams, Connolly & Califano attorney David E. Kendall.[3] He represented George Stephanopoulos in an incriminating book about the Clintons.[3] In 1997, after his wife resigned from CBS, he went back to representing the Clintons, and helped to negotiate the sale of their post-presidential memoirs; and helped former Clinton officials to secure new employment (Donna Shalala as president of the University of Miami and Lawrence Summers as president of Harvard University.[3] 

Barnes’ clip on Twitter:

The clip on the Flynn case:

Man!!!!!!!

This website. Again, I type a long reply and it just vanishes.

I have learned my lesson. I do it on a note and then copy and paste on here. 

Trump is actually a very friendly and giving President. 

Twitter wanted everybody to know that they are not just a little old public speaking platform. So he granted them their wish and gave them the elevated status of public media outlet. With all the normal privileges and accompanying responsibilities and liabilities of course. 

Antifa wanted to show their real muscle and wanted everybody to know that they are not just your normal run of the mill little social group. So Trump said: “I’m cool with that. I’ll upgrade your status to that of dangerous terrorist organisation and we will happily be treating you accordingly”. 

All in a matter of a few days. 

Nice man, good old Donny. 

Try again...

Barr says the days of big platforms behaving like publishers but being regulated like platforms is over.

It's a knock for Facebook and friends. We'll know how big a one by the amount of change we see on their platforms. 

Perhaps they'll adopt Reddit like tools. The community up or downvotes. After too many downvotes the post his hidden. Therefore, self-censoring and not controlled by the platform. Looking at how polarised Reddit has turned out, it doesn't seem to be a good solution. Gosh that place can be a cesspool. It just clumps the worst people together.

Anyhow, Trump and Barr set JD up. That's my take. They had them docs ready to go. 

I don't think Rooi understands what a giant kick in the dick this is for these platforms. Rooi, like JD, was playing checkers while uncles Donnie and Bill were playing 4D chess.

Here is a challenge. Go out and find any centrist channel on youtube that doesn't ultimately agree with this EO. You won't. Every single last one of ALL the big names supports this. And they have many viewers. Swathes of the democrat party are also secretly behind this. They see the protection it affords them. 

And it's not a new thing. Content creators, businesses and political personalities, from both sides, have been calling for this distinction to finally be cleared up, for years. You'll find hundreds of articles on this topic and many date back to the better part of a decade. It's indeed something I've known about for some time.

When Snarkie equated newspapers to social media platforms previously, I didn't bother bringing this up as it'd have been a waste of time. I believe his reasoning was something like, "Well if newspapers and other media can be biased why can't social media platforms?" 

Shark, the coincidental sequence of your education is quite remarkable.

The move benefits both sides. Pity they had to embarrass the toddler JD but I'm sure his nose-ring comforts him. 

What's the real score RooiVis, what's the real score?

“  Anyhow, Trump and Barr set JD up. That's my take. They had them docs ready to go. “

What I been thinking as well. I think they set up the trap and laid out the bread crumbs, probably having a giggle, while wondering about what the chances were of JD not being the first clod to walk straight into the trap. 

“ As long as the two fact-check tags are still there and the hidden tweet remains hidden, it's Twitter 3, Bozo 0. “

Hahaha. Ou Rooies still believes that Trump’s main aim in signing the EO was an effort to have the tags removed and the hidden tweet restored. 

Plonker. 

Redneck has lost his way.

I'm not sure if it's the early onset of Alzheimers. He's a shadow of his former self.

Sad to see him like this.

Alzheimers isn't all bad. You can hide your own Easter eggs, you make new friends every day and you can hide your own Easter eggs.

"Alzheimers isn't all bad. You can hide your own Easter eggs, you make new friends every day and you can hide your own Easter eggs."

 haha

The following about Twitter:-

Twitter has rolled out a new warning label and fact-check system to call out tweets that are false, like when President Trump says anything at all.

But the social network is trying to be fair and so is also checking tweets from the Communist Party of China, such as a recent one where China spokesperson Lijian Zhao said that China's coronavirus response was "very great" and that China treats its people with respect. Instead of labeling the tweet as against Twitter rules or as "false," however, the social network found that the tweet was "morally true."

"The Twitter fact-checking team has reviewed this tweet and found it to be morally true," reads the label. Those who click "Learn More" are redirected to the Communist Party's website, where they can read tons of great information about how awesome China is and how President Xi can heal the coronavirus with his laser eyes."

Meng you met die semels...since when is the Chinese government anything morally whatever? The Chinese government have been funding a massive world wide propaganda campaign for decades now, but they are still the same godless dictators of the 80's. Their game is up...they've been exposed. 

Shark,

You'll just never get it.

I personally can't be arsed explaining it to you better than I have already done.

Just know that there are people looking out for your well being while you support the other team.

“  If Obama had falsely stated the elections would be rigged if mail-in votes are used, having a fact check is fine “

And once again, this clip from 2016 comes in handy.

A clip of Obama saying that elections are accurate. Not sure why it is relevant other than to further confirm what I am saying. 

The reality is most of the world has respect for Obama, except the religious alt-right.
Most of the world sees Trump for what he is - a piece of shit.

The younger generations in the US are much less religious, so garbage like Trump carrying his Bible will never get back into power in the US

SB

As stated how many more court cases do you want about election fraud by the DP before  realizing that proper control  of  the identification of voters is needed before they can cast a vote.   In any event in hearing of  Senate there was a presentation that near to 3,2 million dead voters risen from their graves in the 2016 election in California.   There was in fact 5,5 million dead and missing voters on the role and in a court case subsequently the State was instructed to clean up their voters role,   Nothing has been done thus far about it.

So when a voter died or moved away from an address the voter remains on the role,   The Democrats have used that to the maximum and there standard procedure always  followed by them in dealing with it:-

*    Identify the dead and missing on the voters role and then find a way to get non-registered people who are basically illegal migrants.   

*    They then issue a state identification document to the new voter which does not indicate whether a voter is a US Citizen or not,    Using that they register the non-citizens as voters and they are allowed to vote on an absentee basis and the votes are collected by party agents/

*    The fact is that the California laws on election was changed to remove the need for identifying voters totally.  

   .                

SB

You must be really nuts if you think that the system is not totally corrupt.   Why is the Democrats so keen on it?   Because they have committed major fraud in  elections for years and they do not want to stop their corrupt voter practices,   Corruption are reduced by identifying voters through normal practices required in all democracies. 

I do not thin such a large majority even with fraudulent votes.  There has already been 3,2 million such votes in 2016 in California and 800 000 in Texas.

Anyway - Trump suggested there can be fraud and there was.  Despite  massive fraud in states like California, New York and Illinois  that was no enough to win in the Electoral College.                

“ Posted by: sharkbok (11755 posts)

A clip of Obama saying that elections are accurate. Not sure why it is relevant other than to further confirm what I am saying. “

I always knew that you were not the brightest sparkler in the pack, but sadly, you seem to have even less sparkle than I thought. 

You talked about Trump’s false claim, saying something like, and I’m paraphrasing, “Imagine if Obama made a false claim.....”. I showed you an example of Obama making a false claim with no consequences. His minions actually thought that he was quite cute.