The 2 "further Right" Wings of America Compared

The "further" right-wing in America can be broken into 2 categories or ideologies: Beeno is a simpleton that is clearly compatible with the latter category. 

1. The sensible "further" right-wing that live in reality. These are educated people that favour right-wing ideologies for various reasons such as station of birth, career position and ideals. Essentially smart people that add value to the world view. Some may believe in religion or the values within religion- but they are not brainwashed- and therefore capable of independent thought. 

The right-wing in Western Europe are not religious. (At least not ultra-brainwashed religious anyway). Naturally, they are more similar to the sensible "further "right-wing" in the US. 

2. The unsensible "further" right-wing that use conspiracy theories to try to make sense of the world. 

They are very religious and will often quote passages from the old testament Arab passages (e.g. Moses the Arab, Babylon etc). Noah the Arab etc. 

Then they like to prophesize the future using the new testament Book of Revelations. They have no objectivity, instead their filter reality to try fit their dogma. They despise proven experts in a society like scientists because it challenges their limited dogma. 

The colloquial term in the US is a religious redneck. They get duped by the sensible right-wing to make up much of the lower-paid workforce. 

Conspiracy Examples include:

1. Bill Gates Micro-tag that will track everyone in the world. 
2. The Globalist world order. 
3. Good and Evil- and nothing in between. 
4. The Illuminati
5. Corona Virus is a means for the globalist world in order to take over the world.
6. Trying to protect the environment is part of a globalist conspiracy.
7. Anything new that pops up
8. China and Arab terrorists and much of the West are in cahoots to establish one world order. 
9. Anyone that does not share their limited view of the world is part of the Globalist first world order. 
10. Anyone that does not share their limited view of the world is a communist antichrist. 
11. The would like to burn people on the stake that challenge their limited viewpoints. 
12. Their Church adds fuel to the fire by stirring the seeds planted into them as children
13. The like to talk about capitalism, even if they are in lower-paid menial jobs (and not actually capitalists). 
14. The list goes on.

Some of the political campaigns in the US target the second category purely for votes. 

They are mostly just consumers to keep the wheel turning and have no real influence otherwise in society. 

Some of the videos that Beeno uses for his own brainwashing purposes are from these people. Good entertainment, but nothing of any relevance. 

The four  left wings of America compared:

1 The Wall Street Types who want to keep the ‘carried interest exemption’ and sell the country to the highest bidder.

2 The old blue collar coalition of hard working people who were so brainwashed as children they don’t see that the Democratic alliance with immigrants is being funded with their taxes.

3 The  looney tunes, Marxists who haven’t understood the model failed in Eastern Europe, Russia, N Korea, Venezuela, Cuba and China.

4 The new religious zealots who worship man....call others deniers, believe every human is good .....and demand no prisons, open borders, free everything, no work if you aren’t so inclined and a cheque from the government every month.

Shark looks like a 4 to me.

The educational gap in partisan orientation continues to grow

Higher educational attainment is increasingly associated with Democratic Party affiliation and leaning.

Religious affiliation and party identification

White evangelical Protestants remain one of the most reliably Republican groups of voters, and the GOP’s advantage among this segment of the population has continued to grow in recent years: 77% of white evangelical voters lean toward or identify with the Republican Party, while just 18% have a Democratic orientation.

Urban voters grow more Democratic, rural voters more Republican

Voters in urban counties have long aligned more with the Democratic Party than the Republican Party, and this Democratic advantage has grown over time. Today, twice as many urban voters identify as Democrats or lean Democratic (62%) as affiliate with the GOP or lean Republican.

Overall, those who live in suburban counties are about evenly divided in their partisan loyalties (47% Democratic, 45% Republican), little changed over the last two decades.

Voters in rural areas have moved in a more Republican direction over the last several years. From 1999 to 2009, rural voters were about equally divided in their partisan leanings.

A wide – and growing – generational divide in partisanship

The generational gap in partisanship is now more pronounced than in the past, and this echoes the widening generational gaps seen in many political values and preferences.

Millennial voters (born 1981 to 1996) have had a Democratic tilt since they first entered adulthood; this advantage has only grown as they have aged.

Democrats enjoy a 27-percentage-point advantage among Millennial voters (59% are Democrats or lean Democratic, 32% are Republican or lean Republican). In 2014, 53% of Millennial voters were Democrats or leaned Democratic, 37% tilted toward the GOP.

Except in the last 5 national contests ....senate 16/18..house 16/18....president 16, the Republicans have won 4 out of 5. There are polls and there are elections.

Astounding insights on this thread...absolutely astounding!

Good point Rooineck, I have updated the title of this thread to " The 2 further-Right Wings of America Compared"

Damn right Peeper.....there is no “Americam” left wing party.

Hahahaha....what a twit.

American right vs The USSSR left? I know what I would pic. It's only been 30 years since the missery that was Communism was abolished and the world seems hell bent on giving it another go under a new guise...the world truely deserves what's coming.

What is a long time? It seems that the rule of Democrats and Republicans over the last 30-40 years or so is even - so people gradually get gatvol of both...

Sometimes people want change, not because they like the alternative - but just because they are sick of the status quo...

"so people gradually get gatvol of both...

Sometimes people want change, not because they like the alternative - but just because they are sick of the status quo..."

The smartest and most original thing you ever posted on this board!

This is another hilarious comment from SB,  His analysis are seriously flawed since it does not take account of the other factors as well.  The DP in most states are totally dependent on the Black and Latino votes.  In some states that is a decisive situation.  Without the Black vote and the Latino vote the Democrats will lose virtually every state outside of New York, Chicago and California.  

In the 2016 election for instance 94% of the Black female votes  and 80%  of the male votes went to the DP.   In the case of the Latino vote 67% went to the Democrats,   That was enough for them to win in States with a high percentage of Black and Latino voters - for instance Colorado and Nevada.  These two categories of voters are not highly educated and has been used for decades by he Democrats as voting fodder,   In any event this category of voters make up about 22% of the total voters role in the USA.   . 

The other 78% of the voters are basically made up of White voters.  Of those about 67% is without College degrees.   So that brings the number of votes to be garnered by the DP in the College degree category down to 26% of the total number of voters in the USA from a White perspective.   There are also a huge Jewish vote in the USA in certain states like New York, Florida and California  and they vote 75% for the DP.  That destroy your so=called religion argument totally.  

The other story about the Rednecks is also a myth,  The working class Blue collar workers have been aligned with the Trade Unions for many decades.and the trade unions was a major contributor and partner of the DP.   This category of White voters made up about  52%  of all the voters,  Those voters let to the Democrats controlling the States of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and some others for decades.   However. these voters have found a drop of standard  of living and growing unemployment for 30 years after the departure of Reagan and both Republican and Democratic Presidencies were guilty of that.  Normally Democratic millions of voters sick and tired of the promises made by the various Presidents and the export of jobs to other countries in terms of the Obama trade agreements went to Trump.

So whatever analysis you came up with is fatally flawed.   The DP has alienated millions of voters through their skewed policies and the fact is that is why Trump won the 2016 election.  Will the "rednecks" as you call them go back to the DP that used to be their political home?   It happened after they voted for Reagan and then went back to the Democrats   In the end I doubt very much whether they will.  The DP has written them off and see the future as depending on illegal migrants whom they encouraged to flood the USA,  In many cases these people are fraudulently registered as voters and allowed to vote in DP controlled  States and cities.    That is why the DP favour open borders - which threatens the livelihoods of present Black and Latino voters as well,  

The problem with the DP is they have no real policies on anything.  They have the extreme left wing - who are the loudest voice with the aid of major news media and those are likely to highjack the Party in future.   Will they then be supported by their traditional supporters?  Remember the group with the strongest links to religion are in fact the Latinos and Blacks who are largely conservative Christians - a group which you describe as only RP supporters.  

The analysis you give and your deductions are faulty and superficial and does not take account  reality at all.                                    

"The problem with the DP is they have no real policies on anything."

The "Free Stuff Crowd' -promising the have-nots the sun, the moon and the stars, but they deliver nothing and skim all the cream off the top for themselves while they are managing public funds poorly. Uneducated-mob-rule...the end.

The Clinton and Obama Administrations did something that is reprehensible and extremely detrimental to the ordinary voters,   Without any moral principles they changed the Democratic Party drastically to the detriment of the longer term survival of the Party, They introduced systems  wide upon to corruption  and that effect Governance on all levels.

It was bad under Clinton - but even worse under Obama,   To stop investigation of  criminal activities in Government they appointed senior managers in the FBI and Justice Departments to prevent real investigation of corrupt activities in administration.   The most senior Party Members should have been instated and jailed - but the FBI effectively stopped investigations that would implicate the Democrat leadership.

It is  fact that for instance that they spied on the RP election campaign in 2015 and 2016 and the IG report on their activities indicated how they destroyed the most basic principles of Democracy in the process.   That was not all - together with the Obama Administration. Clinton and the DNC they co-operated to start allegations about how Putin wanting  Trump elected  as President.   That was a total lie and even the Mueller investigation - appointed to nail Trump - could found zero proof of it.  Fact is the DP became so crooked that they could not afford a person like Trump becoming President.

When Trump asked President Zelenski to look at the fraudulent activities of the Bidens in Ukraine - they panicked.   Not only Biden was under a cloud - Kerry, Clinton, Pelosi, Schiff, Podesta - Clinton's campaign manager in 2016 - and potentially also Obama himself could be n judicial trouble for corruption - hence the panic that led to the Impeachment farce,