FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / CRICKET /  An Ode to Moronic Mike

An Ode to Moronic Mike

Started by Mozart56 REPLIES1,132 VIEWS· 04 Mar 2015, 01:03
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Mar 2015, 01:03
#1
04 Mar 2015, 01:03#1

Every morning on the Board you can see him arrive

 

He stands 5 foot seven, and weighs 245

 

Rather narrow at the shoulder and broad at the hip

 

He gets  kinda fussy if you give him some lip

 

 

 

Moronic Mike, Moronic Mike

 

Very Moronic Mike

 

 

 

Mike always  says  he comes from Ballito

 

But it now appears he was incognito

 

For nobody recalls Moronic Mike Street

 

Nor those other  fantasies he loves to tweet

 

 

 

Moronic Mike, Moronic Mike

 

Very Moronic Mike

 

 

Still if you are picking your ODI  openers

 

And Amla comes up for a game at the Wanderers

 

Mike is a  shrewd discerner of class

 

And no  dissembler when offered a glass.

 

 

 

Of Bubbly Mike, Moronic Mike

 

Very Moronic Mike

 

 

For he will select your ODI team

 

And if you would grant ... a T20 scheme

 

In which Amla would certainly not be dropped

 

But come in at 7 in case you have flopped

 

 

Moronic Mike, Moronic Mike

 

Very Moronic Mike

 

 

And so it must be obvious to all who can see

 

That a cricketing Fundi always has to be

 

A man whose vision hits the mark

 

Though his many fulminations are but a lark

 

 

 

Like Mike, Moronic Mike

 

Very Moronic Mike.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Mar 2015, 02:03
#2
04 Mar 2015, 02:03#2
 Snake Sh!t 
Are you trying to be a funny old liar?  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Mar 2015, 02:22
#3
04 Mar 2015, 02:22#3

A pithy response one can  always expect

 

And hints of an ascerbic nature detect

 

But tis not the issue from a heart that is bleak

 

But rather the mumblings of a silly old freak

 

 

Moronic Mike, Moronic Mike

 

Very Moronic Mike

 

 

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
04 Mar 2015, 12:30
#4
04 Mar 2015, 12:30#4
This is truly cringeworthy. I'm actually embarrassed for the old fop.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
04 Mar 2015, 13:02
#5
04 Mar 2015, 13:02#5
 Mike, don't get angry, most of us know you aren't a moron.Ag no man Moz leave the Oom alone for a bit please.
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
04 Mar 2015, 15:24
#6
04 Mar 2015, 15:24#6
Hahaha, no man Moz!! You may good at many things, but poetry is apparently not one of them!
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Mar 2015, 15:28
#7
04 Mar 2015, 15:28#7

No RooiAAS you are not embarrassed for me.....you see I still recall your pathetic efforts at verse, with nursery school rhymes and crippled rhythm. 

 

Actually Draad I was leaving bouncing Mike alone until yesterday when he lost his cool. This is a gentle response....look no four letter words or nasty names! Well, moronic, I confess, but that is scarcely new news.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Mar 2015, 15:34
#8
04 Mar 2015, 15:34#8

Wrong Bloo the rhyme is complex and the rhythm, the most challenging part, is precise. Recite this fine work and you will see it slides off your tongue. Technically it's as precise as you would expect from a guy whose translation of Virgil's Aeneid  was used by the whole school. 

 

For example note the subtle alliteration in:

 

 

"Mike is a  shrewd discerner of class

 

And no  dissembler when offered a glass."

 

 

The use of repitition and alliteration in "Moronic Mike".

 

 

 

The complex and relevant rhyming ...."incognito and Ballito" ...."openers and Wanderers", with it's delightful silent "er" in the middle. Something that reads out of rhythm but normal speech puts right back in rhythm.

 

And the rhyming supports the plot it's not gratuitous, it tells the story.

 

 

It's actually good stuff. Enjoy it, don't lets RooiAAS' jealous little snipe bother you.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
04 Mar 2015, 15:48
#9
04 Mar 2015, 15:48#9
Moffie's got it back to front
I'm not so bad and he's a [insert rhyming word here].
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Mar 2015, 15:58
#10
04 Mar 2015, 15:58#10

 Classic RooiAAS, the rhythm is wrong.....he needs one more beat in the first line.

 

 

"Moffie has"  is much better than "moffie's" which slurs over the extra beat, and forces you to unnaturally elongate "ie's". Which in turn doesn't allow you to put comfortable emphasis on "Moff".

 

 

And the rhyming is right back to your usual nursery rhyme style.

 

Tell you what try your hand AAs and I'll do my best to help.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Mar 2015, 16:28
#11
04 Mar 2015, 16:28#11

This little effort got lost at the end of a string the other day ....perhaps you will enjoy this a bit more Bloo:

 

Settled down to watch the Stormers game

 

enjoying a spot of lunch

 

Open rugby earned the Blues their fame

 

But Triggsy preferred  the punch

 

So he picked the strongest Stormers chap

 

and launched the dastardly blow

 

Duane said 'what was that slap' 

 

And Joubert needed to know

 

It couldn't be seen on the TMO screen

 

But the Linesman was on the spot

 

Triggsy it seemed had tried to be mean

 

And a red card was his lot.

  

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Mar 2015, 16:33
#12
04 Mar 2015, 16:33#12

Again notice the rhyme tells the story.  And this time there is a modest example of assonance (no puns please) in the line ..."it couldn't be seen on TMO screen".

 

The rhythm in this piece is pretty rudimentary though, a bit like the Beatles "Rocky Raccoon", just as the Ode to Mike is based on  "Big John".

 

"His rival, it seems
Had broken his dreams
By stealing the girl of his fancy
Her name was Magill
And she called herself Lil
But everyone knew her as Nancy"

 

Notice though in this case,  the clumsy:

 

"Her name was Magill

 

And she called herself Lil

 

But everyone knew he as Nancy"

 

 

A good example of gratuitous rhyming.

 

I scribble these things off in a heart beat....but one can tinker with them for some time.

GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
04 Mar 2015, 17:39
#13
04 Mar 2015, 17:39#13
BIG BAD JOHN...lolz

http://youtu.be/Hy7arhKbQkQ


RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
04 Mar 2015, 19:39
#14
04 Mar 2015, 19:39#14
"I scribble these things off in a heart beat....but one can tinker with them for some time."
One could tinker . . . or one could puke . . . or one could just cringe in embarrassment that a grown man would put up this kind of bilge and then still applaud himself . . .

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Mar 2015, 19:48
#15
04 Mar 2015, 19:48#15
A spiteful jealous man. How are the ponies this week?  
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
05 Mar 2015, 02:47
#16
05 Mar 2015, 02:47#16
Mozart, this is obviously an imitation of that old lyric...Big John (link above)

Big John
Big John

Ev'ry mornin' at the mine you could see him arrive
He stood six foot six and weighed two forty five
Kinda broad at the shoulder and narrow at the hip
And everybody knew, ya didn't give no lip to Big John

(Big John, Big John)
Big Bad John
(Big John)

Nobody seemed to know where John called home
He just drifted into town and stayed all alone
He didn't say much, he kinda quiet and shy
And if you spoke at all, he just said, "Hi" to Big John

Somebody said he came from New Orleans
Where he got in a fight over a Cajun Queen
And a crashin' blow from a huge right hand
Sent a Louisiana fellow to the Promised Land, Big John

(Big John, Big John)
Big Bad John
(Big John)

Then came the day at the bottom of the mine
When a timber cracked and men started cryin'
Miners were prayin' and hearts beat fast
And everybody thought that they'd breathed their last, 'cept John

Through the dust and the smoke of this man made shell
Walked a giant of a man that the miners knew well
Grabbed a saggin' timber, gave out with a groan
And like a giant Oak tree, he just stood there alone, Big John

(Big John, Big John)
Big Bad John
(Big John)

And with all of his strength he gave a mighty shove
Then a miner yelled out, "There's a light up above"
And twenty men scrambled from a would-be grave
Now there's only one left down there to save, Big John

With jacks and timbers they started back down
Then came that rumble way down in the ground
And then smoke and gas belched out of that mine
Everybody knew it was the end of the line for Big John

(Big John, Big John)
Big Bad John
(Big John)

Now they never reopened that worthless pit
They just placed a marble stand in front of it
These few words are written on that stand
At the bottom of this mine lies a big, big man, Big John

(Big John, Big John)
Big Bad John
(Big John)

(Big John)
Big Bad John


Read more: Jimmy Dean - Big Bad John Lyrics | MetroLyrics

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Mar 2015, 03:03
#17
05 Mar 2015, 03:03#17
Sure Chabal, thats why I referenced it above. But I only use the first verse. Funny how  Rooinek is ranting about how awful it is, when it's like Big John one of the all time hits. The rhythm is the same, the rhyming is better.

It takes a jealous man to sing a jealous song....that's also from a fifties song.
CL
ClaydogClub Pro691 posts
05 Mar 2015, 04:55
#18
05 Mar 2015, 04:55#18
 When read to the tune of Big Bad John I must admit I found it quite clever and amusing. Just another shot across the bow in this long running battle.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Mar 2015, 06:36
#19
05 Mar 2015, 06:36#19
Very kind Clayhound , I'm glad somebody enjoyed it. 
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
05 Mar 2015, 08:44
#20
05 Mar 2015, 08:44#20
When it comes to rhymes, there is a massive difference between a poem and a song! A lyrical rhyme may well make no sense when read without the accompanying music, but when the rhythm of the music is added, even a non rhyming lyric can be a masterpiece. This should not be the case with a poem.
Moz, why exactly are you writing poems dedicated to Mike anyway? 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
05 Mar 2015, 10:03
#21
05 Mar 2015, 10:03#21
 Mozart
Idiot - have you checked on when last Amla played in a T20 game for the Proteas and are you aware that he rarely played for the Proteas in that format of the game - because he is essentially not a T20 batsman.   But then the clown is used to making a fool of himself - an utter fool and worse - his brain has fossilled in piss.  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
05 Mar 2015, 15:08
#22
05 Mar 2015, 15:08#22

Then why do you want to bat him at 7 for the Proteas in the T20?  And keep your language clean old chap, nothing uglier than an old man using bad language.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
05 Mar 2015, 17:41
#23
05 Mar 2015, 17:41#23
 .....fossill ed in.............?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 Mar 2015, 05:35
#24
06 Mar 2015, 05:35#24
 Mozart
That was written more than a year ago - and it turned out I was right about Amla - not a T20 player - you blubbering old fool.   
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Mar 2015, 06:14
#25
06 Mar 2015, 06:14#25
Blubbering? Forgive me, but you seem to be the one who is blubbering.
You wrote a post,  reproduced elsewhere, where you wanted Amla to be dropped to number 7 in the T20 scheme. Such stupidity is timeless...it was terminally dumb if you wrote it yesterday or 10 years ago.
Then you accused me of not knowing Amla was not in the current T20 team . A total red herring, as I said nothing about the T20 team except by reproducing your stupid idea.
But above all, stop whining.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 Mar 2015, 07:41
#26
06 Mar 2015, 07:41#26
 Mozart
You caused the whole problem in this case and that is why I lost my cool completely.  Lets go into detail:-
Amla in the WC
The whole issue started when I said previously that Amla's figures in World Cup matches do not match his averages in other ODI's and that he was not convincing in the first three matches.   I said at the time he should up his game - but never suggested he should be dropped from the team.
Agpleezedaddy then made a false statement implying that I said Amla should be dropped and you made a most insulting remark without checking the facts of the matter - and I challenged you to produce proof that I said Amla should be dropped.   What you came up with was utter BS dealing with a previous item on T20 games where years ago I said Amla is not really a T20 player and if he does play at T20 level he should bat very low in the order.   That was long before he was indeed dropped from the Protea T20 squad - proving that I was right about him not really being a T20 player.   However, it had sweet fanny adams to do with the topic under discussion and was a dishonest move on your part to cloud the issue - utter BS.   I then told you you are a liar and an insult to humanity.
Next thing you find a thread where I wrote that I think Amla should to my mind bat at 3 in ODI's and where I said we must find other openers instead of Graeme Smith and Amla.   By quoting a selected extract you were again blatantly dishonest.   Caught lieing is bad - and to make it worse is blatant dishonesty to try and cover up the lie.
So to date you have just been dishonest and a liar - I gave you an opportunity to apologize and I will accept an apology - but until then I regard you as dishonest and a disgrace on this site.  
      
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
06 Mar 2015, 08:28
#27
06 Mar 2015, 08:28#27
Moz, would Manic Mike have stuffed up your rhyme that much?
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
06 Mar 2015, 09:30
#28
06 Mar 2015, 09:30#28
 Mike it would appear you never asked that Amla be dropped. Dont let this stuff get to you. 
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
06 Mar 2015, 10:33
#29
06 Mar 2015, 10:33#29
Whatever was said when is not all that relevant. What is interesting is to consider what was said and the reasoning behind it. We were told that Amla was batting "too slow" and should be batting at no 7 in T20s. The norm for T20 is to have a hard hitting, almost slogger, type of batsman at the end and not someone going at a run a ball or less. 
Be that as it may. Ou Maaikie's call was that we needed Graeme Smith fired ASAP, and replaced by QdK for the CWC. How did that turn out?
In addition, he was convinced that Amla is no opening bat and should bat lower down the order. He went as far as saying that Amla was (at the time) not even a regular ODI opening batsman. 
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
06 Mar 2015, 14:09
#30
06 Mar 2015, 14:09#30
 So Mike made a wrong turn but he didnt say Amla must be dropped cerudunce windpomp - which appears to be a big bone of contention.

Beeno showing what a good ref is like!
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Mar 2015, 16:39
#31
06 Mar 2015, 16:39#31
So HasBEEN what do you think Moronic Mike meant when he said Amla was too slow for ODIs and that De Kock should replace either of our openers. I'm curious oh great referee.....And given you are going by the e xact words, please give us an exact interpretation.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 Mar 2015, 17:07
#32
06 Mar 2015, 17:07#32
 Mozart
Do you know the difference between T20 matches and ODI's.  I never said anything about replacing Amla with De Kock - are you too bloody thick to understand that - or are you trying to cover your lies with misrepresentations.
This really is funny - you were caught out being a liar and you twist and turn like a snake to get out of it.   Rather than admit you were wrong and apologize you are getting deeper and deeper into the hole he dug for yourself by coming up with deception and more lies.   
Lets quote another lie from you:-
"Mike meant when he said Amla was too slow for ODIs and that De Kock should replace either of our openers."
Find one place where I said anything like you mentioned above. Mozart - this is getting absurd.  Are you basically dishonest or just pretending to be.    
Why not admit you made a fool of yourself and apologize?    
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 Mar 2015, 17:19
#33
06 Mar 2015, 17:19#33
 Ceradunce
Are you bloody dim as well?   What was De Kock's batting record in his last 10 ODI's and what was Quinton de Kock's in his first ten ODI's - compare those figures and then come up with your standard BS.   SA cricket fired Graeme more than a year before he retired from test cricket and that was done with a bloody good reason.   De Kock is out of form after a two month injury lay-of - but the question is would Smith have done better in the present WC?   Not bloody likely.      
AG
AgPleezDeddyClub Pro900 posts
06 Mar 2015, 18:37
#34
06 Mar 2015, 18:37#34
 Mike I may be wrong but I don't think I said anything about your views on Amla, please show me where and I'll happily apologize.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Mar 2015, 20:21
#35
06 Mar 2015, 20:21#35

   

Mike you ask the following:

 

"'Find one place where I said anything like you mentioned above. Mozart - this is getting absurd.  Are you basically dishonest or just pretending to be.'  

 

Well here you are simpleton:

 

"I am not sure of Amla on ODI level - he is no doubt excellent in tests - but on ODI a questionable opener - and then we have another opener that should have been at no 3 and is not an opening batter at all. De Villiers and Faf were poor yesterday - but are reliable batters - so that was an anomaly. That brings me to Duminy - who also failed in batting this series.

I think the Proteas should look at their batting line-up for ODI's and start developing a player like Quinton De Kock as an opener - might not work out in the short term - but he cannot be worse than the present openers".....Moronic Mike

 

There you are you laughable old fool. HasBEEN I repeat my quesion.....what the hell do you think Moronic Mike is saying when he says that de Kock couldn't be worse than either ODI opener.

GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
06 Mar 2015, 20:33
#36
06 Mar 2015, 20:33#36
 Why don't you guys shut up...its becoming boring...shake hands electronically ,if that's possible. You are both good guys and posters...wake up and grow up
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Mar 2015, 20:37
#37
06 Mar 2015, 20:37#37

So why are you opening the string, you know what it's about. You may be ok being called a liar by the fellow who is in fact lying....I'm not. Call that a weakness if you like but it doesn't sit well with me.

 

 

The Moron writes this

 

"Now the fossil is still not responding to the issue of Amla not being in the recent T20 squads of the Proteas.  Is that too hard to grasp for this idiot.   But then one must accept that he does not know the difference between the 50 over and 20 over competitions and the performance requirements in those two versions of the game.An utter idiot - but what else can one expect from him and a liar to boot."

   When in fact he has written this:     "I  read an article in Supersport about the SA approach to  T20 games.  They clainm that the problem is we do not follow the world trend and select big hitters for that version of the game.  The one guy they mentioned was Amla - his run rate is tto slow for that version of the game.  
However, there seems to have been a problem in that regard.  Because of Amla's slow starts it puts pressure on De Kock and he hits out at balls he should not hit at.  
However,  De Kock was not the only casualty of that problem in the New Zealand game  He was quickly followed by AB and Du Plessis and later on by Miller.
I would start by changing the batting order - opening with Faf and De Kock, and AB and Miller coming in at 3 and 4, followed by Duminy and Abie Morkel, Amla and the bowlers."   

 

 

You see he was commenting on Amla in T 20s, just as I reported. So what does that say....he is lying through his teeth.

 

Which is bad enough Chabal but then you treat our cases as equal? Excuse me if that pisses me off.


GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
06 Mar 2015, 21:08
#38
06 Mar 2015, 21:08#38
Mozart don't be such an ar se hole ...youre both wrong...shut this post...I'm genuinely fond of both of you , I'm not a cream puff or  queer...you are both nice guys but are puffed up like like those toads in South America before they fall victIm to a striking snake...Mozart invite Mike over to that sh it house of Chicago,,,where Sinatra danced with his  wife (forgotten which one?) lolz...must have been Juliet Prowse before he became a little man gangster...how does a man that once lived in the beautiful peninsula of Cape Town live in that shi hole of Chicago???
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Mar 2015, 21:28
#39
06 Mar 2015, 21:28#39

That's just the point Sebastien, we aren't both wrong. If saying that makes me an ar se so be it. You are a good fellow and I understand you have good intentions, but if we don't enforce honesty on this site pretty soon it will be just like the real world out there, which you find so unacceptable.

 

Nuff said.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
06 Mar 2015, 21:35
#40
06 Mar 2015, 21:35#40
 Seb I am in a similar position being fond of both. 
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Cricket