Our worst and oldest test side ever
With what...a team of youngsters who can’t even persuade the selectors they are a better than a clutch of journeymen 30 year olds? There is merit to the argument that it’s time to renew.....but not if Hamza is the best of the new crap er crop .
Dave
I have ever heard of a developing cricket side for the future with an average age of 30 before, By them the players should performs as an experienced side - which this one is not.
For interests sake I looked at the English siude that beat the Proteas hollow and their average age is 27. In that team the ages are as follows:-
33 = 2 players
30 = 1 player
29 = 3 players
28 = 1 player
24 = 1 player
22 = 1 player
21 = 2 players
That is more or less what a developing side should look like, Denly (33) is on his way out and he will ne replaced by Burns
No I recall....Hamza looked stylish. But stylish doesn’t win matches. My call would be to play the youngsters who have made a strong case, and given how poor we are, I’d even give a tie to the youngster.
But the idea of a team of youngsters never works. You need some experienced players to lend stability. And experience doesn’t have to be age related. Rabada is close to being experienced now and de Ock is certainly a veteran.
These guys like Hendricks and Paterson get wickets when the batsmen get bored and lose focus. They can never make things happen.
Faf calls that lot a "young team" - maybe they are young compared to him, but a young team it s not.
More from Cricket
- CricketSo our Protea women9 REPLIES · 861 VIEWS
- CricketNice win by our ladies7 REPLIES · 564 VIEWS
- CricketRooi, here you were wondering about Keshav0 REPLIES · 499 VIEWS
- CricketICC Women's T20 Rankings0 REPLIES · 926 VIEWS
- CricketWC semi final live23 REPLIES · 933 VIEWS
- CricketIt’s going to4 REPLIES · 1,008 VIEWS