Pathetic state of things
It's been pathetic for a while, it's just the depth that varies. I warned about it in earlier post. Some on here have been questioning it as well by calling for the death of quotas .....why wouldn't you when everyone is playing on an equal footing. Can only think it's for political reasons if not then it's just dumb...I believe it's the former.
It goes far back and beyond but wind back to the incident when Jacques Rudolph was selected to play only to be dropped from the team sheet the next morning and replaced by some no hoper whose name I can't bother to remember. That no hoper who is a disgrace to the game of cricket was not so long ago the Proteas fielding coach. Think his name is Justin Ontong.
Well may you ask Justin Who?????
Can anyone be specific i.e, the requirements .......maybe its ............ 3black 2indian 2coloured 4white?
Blobbok in answer to your question....
The South African domestic set-up could see a change in transformation targets in the aftermath of the Cobras' yet-to-be-investigated transgression two weeks ago.CSA are yet to conclude an inquiry into why the Cape Town-based franchise fielded only two black Africans instead of the stipulated three in a four-day match against the Warriors at Newlands on Tuesday. ESPNcricinfo understands that the franchise has not received any communication from CSA about a possible probe. Further, it has also emerged that CSA had agreed to the Cobras' XI and that a bid for the franchises to use the same targets that apply to the national team, which are taken on average over a season, was mooted at the coaches' conference in May and was due to be considered by CSA's cricket committee before this season began.Currently, transformation targets in South Africa apply at both domestic and national level. Domestic teams must field at least six players of colour, of which at least three must be black African, and this target must be met in every match. The national team must field at least six players of colour, including at least two black Africans on average over the course of a season. That means, at national level, if only two black African players are included in the XI in any match and four in another, the target is considered to have been met. The domestic franchise coaches are understood to have agreed on, and argued for, the same to apply to them, but they are unaware if their motion was taken up at higher levels.Instead, the franchises have continued to meet the three-plus-three target, except in the final week of October when the Cobras opted not to. While they fielded seven players of colour in their team against the Warriors, only two were black African. The Cobras notified CSA in writing of their reasons, which were transformation, cricketing and semantics based. By including seven players of colour, the Cobras argued they were exceeding the target of six. They also said their combination best-suited the national agenda because it allowed them to play Zubayr Hamza, George Linde and Dane Piedt, who had all returned from the tour of India, two Malan brothers (Pieter and Janneman), Kyle Verreynne, Jason Smith and Dane Paterson, all considered national hopefuls, and Mathew Kleinveldt, who was fresh off a hundred the previous week. Lastly, the Cobras said the word target indicates a non-obligatory selection criteria, in contrast to the word quota. They claim to have had a response from CSA which indicated they could go ahead because they had made a "cogent argument."If that is the case, South Africa's other five franchises, all of whom have treated the target as a quota, would also be able to successfully argue for discarding the black African subsection of the target and for the targets to be calculated on average over the season, instead of for every game. This is essentially what the coaches lobbied for six months ago and could change the landscape of the South African domestic scene. CSA confirmed that they have not finalised the case. "CSA is busy with this matter and will issue a statement once this matter is finalised," Thamie Mthembu, A CSA spokesperson said.Dipshitstick Fikile Fickle was is a major doos in any portfolio.
Sad but true.
30 plus years and counting.
The question is will it ever change....appears not.
NZ, Aussie and English cricket will be the winners with the "Pale" SA players seeking fame and fortune in countries that understand and appreciate their qualities.
Will Donker, Dim and hatefull Africa ever wake up to reality?
More from Cricket
- CricketSo our Protea women9 REPLIES · 855 VIEWS
- CricketNice win by our ladies7 REPLIES · 563 VIEWS
- CricketRooi, here you were wondering about Keshav0 REPLIES · 499 VIEWS
- CricketICC Women's T20 Rankings0 REPLIES · 923 VIEWS
- CricketWC semi final live23 REPLIES · 931 VIEWS
- CricketIt’s going to4 REPLIES · 1,006 VIEWS