FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / CRICKET /  Proteas havea 10% chance ....but they must bat first

Proteas havea 10% chance ....but they must bat first

Started by Mozart40 REPLIES3,144 VIEWS· 15 Mar 2015, 19:06
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Mar 2015, 19:06
#1
15 Mar 2015, 19:06#1

I don't fancy our chances if we bat second against Sri Lanka or any of our likely future opponents, having to chase a big total. The confidence of this side is considerably down  since the West Indies series back home. So how do the odds stack up?

 

We have recent wins against Sri Lanka, but they have WC success and a better tournament so far. I think they are at least 50/50 at this stage.

 

If we prevail in the quarters, we will face NZ or WI....I would put it at 70% that it will be NZ,  and given our recent loss you would give NZ a 60/40 edge. West Indies, with our domination of them, we have to be a 70/30 favourite.

 

That amounts to a .7 x .4 + .3 x .7 = 49% chance of prevailing in the semis. Hope for a big G(r) ayle innings....the one thing that could really tilt WIs odds and our odds.

 

Assuming we get to the final ....our likely opponents are Oz who are I think are 50% likely to get there and 70%  likely to prevail against us in a final. India are 30% likely to get there and 60% likely to win......Pakistan 15% likely to get there and 50% likely to win and Bangladesh only 5% likely to make the final and 10% likely to win.

 

So if we make the final our chances are:

 

.5 x .3 + .3 x .4 + .15 x .5 + .05 x .9 = 39% chance of winning a final against the probability distribution of likely opponents.

 

In aggregate our chances of winning all three games are .5 x .49 x .39 = 9.56 % of winning the WC final. It looks depressing but winning any three games on the trot against top opponents is low. The key is winning the toss.

CH
ChippoPro3,372 posts
15 Mar 2015, 20:55
#2
15 Mar 2015, 20:55#2
 I disagree
If you take a look at my equation, i say the basic physics tells us that the gravitational force, and the electrical force, between two objects is proportional to the inverse of the distance between them squared. On a simple level, the same is true for the strong nuclear force that binds protons and neutrons together to form the nuclei of atoms, and that binds quarks together to form protons and neutrons. However, tiny quantum fluctuations can slightly alter a force's dependence on distance, which has dramatic consequences for the strong nuclear force


We shouldn' t have too much problem with the nucleus reaching optimal electrical force as the tournament reaches its peak. I don't foresee any dynamic equilibration in the finals though. So hopefully we will not be facing the Windies.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Mar 2015, 21:07
#3
15 Mar 2015, 21:07#3
 Well clearly that's the problem de Kock has had....the electrical force is proportional to the inverse of the distance between his bat and his pad.
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
16 Mar 2015, 10:39
#4
16 Mar 2015, 10:39#4
If there's swing in the wicket for the first hour or so then I think we'd want a bowl if we won the toss. 
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
16 Mar 2015, 12:19
#5
16 Mar 2015, 12:19#5
 Kak man, the record clearly shows that we're very poor chasers .......... winning the toss might be the decider in this encounter .
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
16 Mar 2015, 12:42
#6
16 Mar 2015, 12:42#6

Well where's the sense in selecting 3 quicks(Steyn, Abbot and Philander) who  swing the ball, it's the best opportunity to get rid of the Sri Lankan top order. You don't want to bowl those three against Sanggakarra when the wicket flattens out which it notoriously does after the first hour or so. The guy is pure class and he will put our attack to the sword....just trust me on this one.

We are all aware of the Protea meltdown under pressure but from an attacking point of view believe me, the Sydney wicket is pretty lively early in the piece and always favours the team who bats second.

So hold off on the kak until the toss.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
16 Mar 2015, 14:35
#7
16 Mar 2015, 14:35#7

We have the best side on paper in the WC, we just need them to fire and the Cup is ours.

 

Better to have lost 2 group games and then win the rest.

 

When it comes to the knockout stages......stats count for little......its all about backing ones talent and believing now

 

 

BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
16 Mar 2015, 16:25
#8
16 Mar 2015, 16:25#8
Stats don't count for much, but NZ have not lost a game in ages, a loss for them is overdue, I hope it comes against us in the Semi's. 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Mar 2015, 17:27
#9
16 Mar 2015, 17:27#9
Stats don't count for much? So I assume you don't have insurance, walk across bridges or fly on jets.  
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
16 Mar 2015, 17:49
#10
16 Mar 2015, 17:49#10
and as for the teams value on paper....it's what happens in the middle that counts, it's the only thing that counts.  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
16 Mar 2015, 18:11
#11
16 Mar 2015, 18:11#11

Yep stats count for stuff all when it comes to knock out games.......what has happened in the past counts for ZERO......anything can happen on the day when it comes to a one off ODI contested between two good sides. Yep team on paper counts for zero as well.

 

One thing that will count is form......but even that counts for zero when a player in form gets out to a crap ball or gets run out etc  

BE
becsPro4,378 posts
16 Mar 2015, 18:50
#12
16 Mar 2015, 18:50#12
 So, what Saffex is saying is.......wait and see what actually happens on the day, at the actual time, because nothing else that has happened before counts for diddly squat  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
16 Mar 2015, 18:54
#13
16 Mar 2015, 18:54#13
Spot on Becs....its as simple as that.....stats in a QF count for didd ly squat 
BE
becsPro4,378 posts
16 Mar 2015, 19:01
#14
16 Mar 2015, 19:01#14
 Well, I thought that's what you were getting at  
Stats often mean diddly squat.....
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Mar 2015, 19:13
#15
16 Mar 2015, 19:13#15
Well if it's all a toss of a coin our odds increase massively from 10 per cent to 12.5 per cent. Man it's hard explaining simple numbers to folks who don't have quantitative liscences. 
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
16 Mar 2015, 19:18
#16
16 Mar 2015, 19:18#16

You can explain all you like, it falls on deaf ears as you don't seem to comprehend the very nature of a knock out game that involves cricket......if we were talking rugby, I might have taken note......cricket is a different ball game.

 

Toss of the coin has about as much to do with it as your stats do.  

BE
becsPro4,378 posts
16 Mar 2015, 19:20
#17
16 Mar 2015, 19:20#17
It's like an Historian trying to explain context to people.....they just don't get it  
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
16 Mar 2015, 19:25
#18
16 Mar 2015, 19:25#18
Stats never give you sensible answers in sport...ability, heart and mindset win you games on the given day.

Mathematicians , like computers cannot think beyond whats data imput.

I have a strange feeling that the Proteas will come through (and obviously the semis) and meet NZ in the semi final...kick my butt if I'm wrong.

IMO the Proteas are the best cricket side in this competition...the problem just lies in the approach...NZ has the best bowling attack...we'll all see this soon...although batting pitches...the bowlers will add the edge to winning.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Mar 2015, 19:49
#19
16 Mar 2015, 19:49#19
If everybody has an equal chance, how is that different from a flip of a coin. Or are we saying, as Chabal does, that hearts and minds matter. in which case we are back to my original post. The numbers are just an attempt to give substance to opinions and experience.
But if the nasty numbers upset you...don't worry about it.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
16 Mar 2015, 20:32
#20
16 Mar 2015, 20:32#20
"I have a strange feeling that the Proteas will come through (and obviously the semis) and meet NZ in the final...kick my butt if I'm wrong."

The Proteas cannot play New Zealand in the final, chump. The winner of South Africa vs Sri Lanka will play the winner of New Zealand vs West Indies in the first semifinal.
Consider your fat butt kicked.
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
16 Mar 2015, 21:58
#21
16 Mar 2015, 21:58#21
 Stats show that if we bat first we invariably win, bat second & we lose 75% .
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
16 Mar 2015, 22:04
#22
16 Mar 2015, 22:04#22
In a knockout game chasing a total north of 280 runs is heavy.  
3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
17 Mar 2015, 01:39
#23
17 Mar 2015, 01:39#23
 Sorry my SA friends. I think Sr Lanka is going to beat you . But hey QF is pretty good. The key is Sangakarra. If he fires game over, if not well you got a chance. SA need to approach it better though. I think Sr Lanka well win tho
Semi Final 1:
Aus v India
Semi Final 2:
NZ v SRLanka
Final:
NZ v Aus
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
17 Mar 2015, 07:34
#24
17 Mar 2015, 07:34#24
Yep you're right...sorry I corrected it.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Mar 2015, 11:37
#25
17 Mar 2015, 11:37#25

Flip of the coin has nothing to do with the best side of the coin winning the flip.......by any side can win it on the day, means the better side on the day will win it.........that better side on the day will be an in the moment thing, it will have stuff all to do with stats, or previous form.

 

Stats or history has little worth in a knock out game, especially in cricket.  

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
17 Mar 2015, 11:46
#26
17 Mar 2015, 11:46#26
The flip of the coin has everything to do with which team gets the best use out of the pitch....that's just common knowledge....if it didn't matter then why on Earth is there so much interest from either captain ...
BE
becsPro4,378 posts
17 Mar 2015, 12:10
#27
17 Mar 2015, 12:10#27
 A lot of it is purely psychological.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Mar 2015, 12:13
#28
17 Mar 2015, 12:13#28

I'm not talking about the toss, I'm talking flip of the coin in general.

 

Winning the toss is always vital

BE
becsPro4,378 posts
17 Mar 2015, 12:34
#29
17 Mar 2015, 12:34#29
 But it's hardly an exact science ! 
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
17 Mar 2015, 13:08
#30
17 Mar 2015, 13:08#30
 
Well Mozzie ol' chap...stats dont read heart and character...when I was young, character was what it was about...we live in a world that's insecure and stereotyped and computers are now assessing decisions in banks...my grandad born in Cork (Eire) bought a rooibos tea farm in Clanwilliam (Western Cape...Cederberg...SA) on a handshake when he retired as a magistrate. It was all about strength of character, honesty and hard work in the old days.

I hope you understand my drift...don't be like Rooinek who waits on the fringes (like a vulture or hyena) to attack any discrepancy or spelling/text error...indeed throws a spanner in the works if he can..casts the baby out with the bath water, if you get my drift
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
17 Mar 2015, 13:29
#31
17 Mar 2015, 13:29#31
SubstantialBull, I really wish you'd get over me and stop trying to drag my name into every one of your vapid and self-absorbed little posts.

Look, I know you've never forgiven me for exposing you as a sad and lifeless loser but really, if you want to have a whiny little pop at me then be a man about it and least say it to me directly. This cowardly business of sneaking in little squeals about me to someone else makes you look an even bigger loser than you did already . . . which barely seems possible!
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
17 Mar 2015, 13:44
#32
17 Mar 2015, 13:44#32
Thats ok Rooy, I can live with that...personally I've stopped attacking you...a lion doesnt have to contest against a hyenya or even a flock of vultures, unless ofcourse they get too many...and there again I'm not inferring you are one of them but I have a slight distaste for pack animals and the majority vote that is herd driven...never been one for the group power...it is the biggest deception in life...all great men and women have had strength to challenge the herd, group or majority...no it's not arrogance but strength of character...grandad said never go with the flow...the majority is always wrong and that's why democracy is shallow and useless...Voltaire was right.

The biggest farce I ever saw on TV was the Survivor Series...what a lie and joke...none of those participants would have never been a survi vor like the fictional Robinson Crusoe...lolz
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
17 Mar 2015, 13:50
#33
17 Mar 2015, 13:50#33
Well the last paragraph of your previous post looked like yet more of your self-righteous and whiny yapping but your reply is noted and all I can say is that if you're such a hero then I'm sure you'll stop behaving like a weak little coward at some point.
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
17 Mar 2015, 14:05
#34
17 Mar 2015, 14:05#34
Your problem is very simple, you have a huge inferiority complex, a huge ch ip on your shoulder and are contentious as a result...you are herd driven...you gang up against those you dont like and kiss aas with those who comply and curry favour with you.

Lets be honest you have a big problem...I've tried to civil with you but you cannot give any compromise...you are a wounded person , my friend who needs to look at himself.

I dont have a problem with anybody else...I think Mike and Mozart , despite their raves, in real life are both good guys, despite their oddities...in fact we are all strange at times and act out of line and Im just as guilty but you really have huge grudges against those who dont play the same fiddle.

Really dont bother to post...I'm not interested in trying to prove a point....those with discernment can read your problem.

I will no longer participate in this fruitless ramble. You are insulting and do not have the foggiest clue into my character...a typical cyber warrior.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
17 Mar 2015, 14:16
#35
17 Mar 2015, 14:16#35
Listen chump, if this "ramble" is becoming "fruitless" then try leaving me out of your mindless witterings in future.

Please don't try to make out that you're retaliating to something I started. That's just deceitful and anyone reading this thread can see that for themselves.
GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
17 Mar 2015, 14:31
#36
17 Mar 2015, 14:31#36
Lets just forget it Rooinek..I enjoy most of your posts when they are not personal and are objective...I have respect for that. I'll leave you out of the humour posts...you dont take ridicule well. It is really not meant in the way you receive it.

Everybody does have good points (and bad) even Saffex, Mike and Mozart!
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
17 Mar 2015, 14:48
#37
17 Mar 2015, 14:48#37

Numerophobia besets the Board. A craven fear of numbers. Dave.....if any team can appear on any day, and the team that happens to have heart on the day will win......the advent of that team among two teams is perfectly described by the toss of a coin.

 

Viewed in retrospect the numbers are very likely to seem wrong. Viewed from today's perspective Oz at 30%, NZ at 20 %, India at about 14%, the Proteas and Sri Lanka at 12%, Pakistan at 6%, WI at 4% and Bangladesh at 2% seems about right to me.

 

That's derived from simple probability chains even though I have fudged the parameters scandalously.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Mar 2015, 14:58
#38
17 Mar 2015, 14:58#38

We are not talking any team.....we are talking two good sides playing a knock out game.

 

Heart is certainly not the only factor that will carry the winning side.

 

The toss of the coin can not be equated at all.

 

The better side on the day will win.....there is no better side to a coin  

GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
17 Mar 2015, 15:08
#39
17 Mar 2015, 15:08#39
 Possibility, probability and most likely are in conflict... hope there are upsets...keep the hopes high...winners and losers make contests exciting...come on Proteas...this your Waterloo against Napoleon.

BE
becsPro4,378 posts
17 Mar 2015, 15:24
#40
17 Mar 2015, 15:24#40
 What odds did you give at Agincourt, Mozart ?  
↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Cricket