FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / CRICKET /  Proteas’ pace aura suddenly looks tenuous

Proteas’ pace aura suddenly looks tenuous

Started by Denny11 REPLIES1,381 VIEWS· 10 Jul 2019, 02:11
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
10 Jul 2019, 02:11
#1
10 Jul 2019, 02:11#1

Cape Town – Even in the generally depressing World Cup 2019 washup, embattled head coach Ottis Gibson was still talking up the virtues of South Africa’s pace attack.

On arrival back in the country, he sought to soften the blow of the Proteas’ seventh-placed finish -- effectively representing their worst CWC yet -- by bringing up the fact that his wish to field a consistently incisive speed arsenal during the tournament was profoundly thwarted by injury issues.

In many respects he was quite entitled to raise the point, of course: he would not have banked on Dale Steyn exiting the event without bowling a competitive ball, Lungi Ngidi being tormented throughout by fitness woes and trump-card Kagiso Rabada beginning the World Cup, at very least, with a jaded look to his body language, speed readings … and, by extension, statistical returns.

That combination of ills went a long way to explaining why South African quickies, by and large, ended the pre-knockout phase well off the premier levels for excellence.

The record-breaking, market-leading Mitchell Starc (Australia), Bangladeshi surprise packet Mustafizur Rahman, India’s Jasprit Bumrah, New Zealand tearaway Lockie Ferguson, England’s extremely slippery duo of Jofra Archer and Mark Wood, Pakistan’s Mohammad Amir and Shaheen Afridi … all of them eclipsed any single Proteas seamer both for tallies of wickets and strike rates.

But that relative blow to South Africa’s well-established pride on the speed front may now seep beyond just the white-ball landscape into Test cricket as well.

For truth be told, certain danger signs flicker for the short- to medium term across the folds over the Proteas’ perceived (and subjective!) dominance in that department.

If evidence from the World Cup is added to recent developments in the five-day environment, all of England, India, Australia and possibly even New Zealand are going to shift – or already have – ahead of South Africa for increasingly important overall depth, simultaneously ensuring a collective sense of freshness and rotational options, in pace resources.

The Proteas’ next major roster challenge is the taxing three-Test series in India (nominally preceded by three Twenty20 internationals) from early October, also marking their debut in the ICC’s newly-established World Test Championship.

There will naturally have to be a suitably sturdy emphasis on spin in the travelling party, but so spicy and multi-skilled is India’s own fast bowling line-up these days that don’t be too dumbfounded if, on some occasions, the hosts might be prepared to offer up surfaces that give the seamers a proper chance as well.

Besides, it is firmly stamped in Gibson’s DNA to want to ensure he has the pace bases appropriately covered, come what may.

But if he’s already assessing – on the strengthening assumption now that he soldiers on for a bit longer as head coach, slightly aiding Cricket South Africa’s cashflow plight – his pace options for India, the Barbadian will pretty instantly twig that the situation isn’t nearly as stable or well-stocked as he might have hoped for.

For one thing, the natural ravages of the ageing process to once-sublime Test servants Steyn and Vernon Philander (36 and 34 respectively) are there for all to see.

Understandable, deep uncertainty surrounds Steyn’s prospects of resuming, from here, his 93-cap career considering the complexity and ongoing tribulations of his bowling-shoulder injury issues -- even if the vast majority of connoisseurs will still be willing that to happen, primarily on the very sound grounds of class being permanent. (He has also shown before his ability to prosper significantly on unforgiving Subcontinental tracks.)

Nor should the more medium-paced but ever-nagging, in-your-face warrior who is Philander be considered a dead cert for the Indian trek yet … he was almost routinely stalked by niggles in the 2018/19 season and seemed to require a concentrated winter conditioning drive (perhaps that has happened?) to get him back closer into optimal fitness shape for a satisfying twilight phase, if you like, to his prestigious top-flight career.

The much younger, highly talented but heavy-boned Ngidi is another, though, who in an ideal world needed a solid run of first-class bowling activity if he is going to muster the required stamina to maintain intensity throughout an Indian-staged, energy-sapping Test series – not to mention also shake off fully his CWC-period ailments.

But that is unlikely to happen, given that the domestic summer will only be in its infancy when the Proteas set off for the tour, so Ngidi will probably pack his bags still sporting a modest 13 first-class appearances and needing to show all of his wiles and more against India’s battery of free-spirited stroke-players.

Rabada? With a bit of luck, the 24-year-old jewel in the SA pace crown will be properly rested by the time the tour comes along, and ready to lead the charge at venues where, for the most part, he will have to bend his back for strike success.

Proper identification of when – and just as crucially when not – to unleash “KG” during the season as a whole (also featuring England’s full-length safari to our shores) will be critical to both his well-being and statistical returns, and I am not sure CSA properly realise yet the risks associated with overplaying him as one of their key marketing devices in these highly challenging times.

Although the next-in-line crop of fast bowlers like Anrich Nortje and Lutho Sipamla could make their major international breakthroughs in 2019/20, vitally broadening the Proteas pool to select from, it is an infuriating, saddening reality that quality top-flight customers like Kyle Abbott, Marchant de Lange and Duanne Olivier (the bowling find of the season last time out before committing to a Kolpak deal and possible future England selection) are unavailable to the SA cause at a time when international schedules are as jam-packed and demanding on quickies’ bodies as they have ever been.

I am not wholly convinced yet that we are heading toward any marked, new golden era in pace bowling in South Africa.

Indeed, we may only be drifting further away from one, given the worrisome variables as things stand …



CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
10 Jul 2019, 02:53
#2
10 Jul 2019, 02:53#2

The pace bowler who had your strongest support - Dale Steyn = never played in a single game in the WC series.   SARU made a serious mistake by not replacing Steyn with Nortje when it became clear Steyn would not be able to play due to injury,

I am not sure how Ngidi will develop, but he should not have been in the WC squad either - especially being under an injury cloud.   

I am also not happy with Rabada.  He was exceptional in the IPL - but could be regarded as a failure in the WC,   It is no use to moan about Olivier - he was not due to stay in SA after being virtually ignored by SA Cricket for years.   He only came on board due to injury problems of Steyn and could not be left out of the team afterwards.

There were too many serious flaws in the squad selection and those include not only Steyn and Ngidi - but also Amla and Duminy.    

   

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
10 Jul 2019, 02:53
#3
10 Jul 2019, 02:53#3

The pace bowler who had your strongest support - Dale Steyn = never played ion a single game in the WC series.   SARU mad a serious mistake by not replacing Steyn with Nortje when it became clear Steyn would not be able to play due to injury,

I am not sure how Ngidi will develop, but he should not have been in the WC squad either - especially being under an injury cloud.   

I am also not happy with Rabada.  He was exceptional in the IPL - but could be regarded as a failure in the WC,   It is no use to moan about Olivier - he was not due to stay in SA after being virtually ignored by SA Cricket for years.   He only came on board due to injury problems of Steyn and could not be left out of the team afterwards.

There were too many serious flaws in the squad selection and those include not only Steyn and Ngidi - but also Amla and Duminy.    

   

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
10 Jul 2019, 03:29
#4
10 Jul 2019, 03:29#4
Amla, Faf, van der Dussen, Tahir......the only performers in the Proteas squad. All over 30. The new talent simply isn't up to the standards set in the past....in cricket or rugby.
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
10 Jul 2019, 05:08
#5
10 Jul 2019, 05:08#5

"The pace bowler who had your strongest support - Dale Steyn..."

Actually, that's a lie.....no bowler had my strongest support, yes I supported Dale Stey n's selection just as I supported Nortje's selection but there isn't a single bowler who had my strongest support and if he did....so what? Tell me, Sage, how do you think Steyn would have gone in english conditions? Ag on second thoughts don't bother....I think I already know.

But now that you've started fingerpointing......I see you're dissing Ngidi.....funny you didn't diss him when he was selected. Hindsight has turned you into more than a World Authority Huh?

"SARU mad a serious mistake by not replacing Steyn with Nortje when it became clear Steyn would not be able to play due to injury,"

You're not wrong, SARU did make a serious mistake




MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
10 Jul 2019, 05:26
#6
10 Jul 2019, 05:26#6
Mike has repeatedly asserted I supported Duminy, the selection of Steyn.....that I was against van der Dussen. All lies he just continues to repeat.
BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
10 Jul 2019, 05:40
#7
10 Jul 2019, 05:40#7

.,

Proteas' CWC 2019 player ratings: Rassie leads the way Lloyd Burnard - Manchester, 08 July 2019 13:24
  • Manchester - The Proteas are back in South Africa after a failed 2019 World Cup campaign that saw them finish in 7th position. 

    It was an incredibly disappointing performance from a side that desperately wanted to challenge for honours in England. 

    Things just never got going for them with losses to England, Bangladesh and India leaving them with a mountain to climb one week into the competition. 

    There were a couple of positives along the way, but in general not enough of South Africa's big players stood up consistently enough. 

    Sport24's Lloyd Burnard has followed the Proteas in England throughout the tournament. Here, he rates their performances. 

    Faf du Plessis - 6.5 (387 runs @ 64.50)

    Du Plessis knows that South Africa's performance in England tainted his legacy as skipper. Finished as SA's leading run scorer at the tournament and capped it off with a superb century against Australia, but by then it was too late. Handled the AB de Villiers media storm firmly and accepted responsibility when things were not going well for the Proteas. Decision to bowl first against Bangladesh in game 2 sticks out and is one that Du Plessis himself regrets. Needed to convert starts into innings of substance earlier in the tournament. 

    Quinton de Kock - 5.5 (305 runs @ 38.12, 9 catches)

    Solid old self as wicketkeeper, but it is his batting that was supposed to be the difference. There were 3 half-centuries in 9 innings, but could not kick on to post the big scores many thought would be South Africa's ticket to success. On his day he is one of the most dangerous in the world, but he was unable to influence proceedings the way he would have wanted. 

    Hashim Amla - 4.5 (203 runs at 40.60)

    Strike rate of 64.85 was most concerning. Amla ended with an 80* against Sri Lanka to salvage something from what had been a difficult tournament up until then. Struggles against raw pace were exposed throughout and he could not get the Proteas any momentum from the top of the order. Difficult to watch a legend of the game struggle this much. Surely the end of the road in the format. 

    Aiden Markram - 3.5 (140 runs @ 23.30)

    Played in 8 of the matches and never once did anything of substance to justify his squad selection ahead Reeza Hendricks. In his 6 innings, there were 3 starts and 3 outright failures. Frustration of watching Markram look as good as anyone only to lose his wicket in the 30s or 40s continues. It is an element of his game that needs urgent remedy, and it contributed to a hugely disappointing tournament for the 24-year-old. 

    Rassie van der Dussen - 8 (311 runs at 62.20)

    Never once looked like the pressures of playing in a World Cup were even remotely a factor. Notched up half-centuries, but probably needed to kick on to something more meaningful in the first three matches of the tournament. Showed leadership potential throughout, remaining calm in some trying times. Will surely be introduced into the Test side soon.

    JP Duminy - 3 (70 runs @ 17.5, 1 wicket @ 61)

    Never got going and found himself completely out of favour for the middle period of the tournament. Came into it all a bit undercooked having just recovered from a shoulder injury and had absolutely no impact. Decision to retire from all international cricket was announced after the Australia match. 

    David Miller - 4.5 (136 runs @ 34)

    All 4 of Miller's innings at CWC 2019 saw him dismissed in the 30s. Surprisingly left out of the tournament opener against England, but could not impact matches the way he needed to when he was eventually backed. Ruled out with injury for final 2 matches, but the overall competition was another in which Miller promised much, but achieved very little. 

    Andile Phehlukwayo - 6.5 (133 runs @ 33.25, 11 wickets @ 30.54)

    Was easily SA's best bowler in the first week of the tournament, but had a tough day out against New Zealand in Birmingham where he was targeted by Williamson and co. Variation with the ball came in handy where others struggled. Will certainly be a key figure in entire build-up to 2023 and this experience will have helped in that regard. 

    Chris Morris - 6.5 (74 runs @ 24.66, 13 wickets @ 26.23)

    Finished as SA's leading wicket taker and was asked to take the new ball during the injury crisis. Was strong throughout, bowling briskly and asking questions. Should never have been the main pace threat given the squad makeup, though, but rose to the task. Limited opportunities with the bat.

    Dwaine Pretorius - 7 (5 wickets @ 18, 3 runs @ 1.5)

    Played just 3 matches. Was poor in the opener against England but then finished with superb displays against Sri Lanka and Australia. Was SA's most economical bowler, going at just over 4. May have had a bigger role to play had Morris not been included as Anrich Nortje's replacement. Showed in final 2 outings what he is capable of and probably warranted more game time. 

    Kagiso Rabada - 5 (11 wickets @ 36.09, 58 runs @ 29)

    So disappointing. Rabada came in as SA's major weapon with the ball and just took so long to get going. Looked to be hitting his straps by the end of the tournament, but by then it was too late. Perhaps unfair to expect so much from him given pre-tournament work load, but Rabada was the Proteas' trump card, especially after Dale Steyn was ruled out. His first major hiccup on the international stage. 

    Lungi Ngidi - 4 (7 wickets @ 30.14)

    Struggled initially, and then broke down with a hamstring injury in second game against Bangladesh. Overall fitness continues to be a major concern, and it reared its head when SA needed the young speedster firing most. The future is still bright, but Ngidi was no help to SA in England. Was out of favour by the end of the tournament, left out despite having recovered from the hamstring strain. 

    Imran Tahir - 7 (11 wickets @ 34.00)

    Has now retired from ODIs and the Proteas will miss him dearly. Bowled at less than 5 per over throughout the tournament despite being asked to operate with the new ball at times. Easily SA's greatest ever spinner in the format and showed exactly why during CWC 2019. May have had more wickets, but there was a clear plan from opposition batsmen to approach Tahir with caution.

    Tabraiz Shamsi - 4 (0 wickets)

    Can't judge him too harshly as he only played 2 games, but he was ineffective in both of those. A surprise addition for the crunch game against India in Southampton while he also played the dead rubber against Australia. Tough tour for spinner. 

    Beuran Hendricks - n/a (0 wickets)

    Flown in as Steyn's replacement, Hendricks bowled just 4 wicketless overs in a routine win against Afghanistan in Cardiff. 

    Dale Steyn - n/a 

    Didn't bowl a ball before he was sent home with a shoulder injury. Left SA going in a man short for their first 3 matches of the competition. 

    @LloydBurnard is in England covering the 2019 Cricket World Cup for Sport24 ... 

BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
10 Jul 2019, 05:41
#8
10 Jul 2019, 05:41#8
ccl
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
10 Jul 2019, 07:42
#9
10 Jul 2019, 07:42#9

KG was very good in the IPL, I watched him give it his all and then some so as far as I'm concerned he suffered burn out at the WC.

Shamsi came on against the lower order and tail yet still couldn't take a wicket. He also had conditions to suit on a turning wicket against Australia but as I've said it never looked like he was going to cash in. Beuran Hendricks is not test level and Olivier was only used and can only be used on slow wickets. Tahir will be missed, he remains a true competitor.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
10 Jul 2019, 11:58
#10
10 Jul 2019, 11:58#10
There's a pigeon taking a dump outside my window as I type this.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
10 Jul 2019, 19:41
#11
10 Jul 2019, 19:41#11
Waaaaaaaaaaaaahahaha.....a clear tell from the 'stool' pigeon.
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
11 Jul 2019, 00:42
#12
11 Jul 2019, 00:42#12

Funnily enough it's only dumping on his window waaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaa

Oh alright, I'll get the bomb squad over.....




— END OF THREAD —

More from Cricket