Quinty and spin
Now we are back to the spin story - when will you stop writing about De Kock and start looking objectively at the other players as well? Your constant harping on De Kock is really bad news.
By the way did you not a while ago suggested that the replacement of Cook by Markram was not justified. Since you have not repeated that jargon may I suppose you have changed your mind?
Duplication
Duplication
Mozart did not blame De Kock for the missed stumping - but what about the bee sting that caused the problem?
Then two things - the Indians are not fools when it comes to pay fortunes for batsmen to play in the IPL and De Kock - despite Mozart's alleged shortcomings as to his inability to play spin bowling - is one of their favourite byes. So lets go further - De Kock went out today because he tried to increase the run rate - while he was betting Bavuma made virtually no runs. He hit a ball which he should not have and got caught.
However, he made a mess of his thinking again. De Kock made 219 runs in the series against Australia - many of which was when Lyon was bowling.
However, the Mozart story against De Kock started years ago and initially De Kock would not be good enough against the Aussie fast bowlers. Then he got onto the spin bowling issue when the Indians were in SA.
The whole myth is about prejudice and nothing else.
The above is the normal BS from the cricket ignorant Mozart in his standard hate campaign against De Kock which has been ongoing for five years. When he does well not a word abou it - but one failure and the headings comes thick and fast.
There must be a real competition between De Kock and Du Toit as to the most threads started by Mozart in his BS campaign against them. I think Du Toit is just ahead, but that is maybe due to De Kock having a poor season against India it dried up afterwards a bit against Australia when he got back his form.
If there is good performacnes by Du Toit as is virtually always the case - the BSter find a reason for criticism - same with De Kock. The whole show is prejudice mania coupled to age of sportsmen dementia.
Himmell - this is unbelievable!!!!!!
Let me put you in the picture about Wicketkeepers. There is a list of wicketkeepers indicating the competency of players, De Kock is on that list - but what is important is that all the players above him on the list are not playing test cricket anymore and only one is still playing in ODI's
What it means is that at present De Kock is the top WK in test cricket and the same in ODI's - and you wants him replaced for a flimsy reason you dreamt up while in a delusional state =- how stupid could that be?.
Yet they are paying millions to employ him in IPL, Why are you so intend to make stupid statements like you are prone to do?
@ Mike
Quinty us talented for sure.
Though you gotta admit Klaasen looks to be a solid limited format performer who can come in late and change a game.
Tricky one as CSA have to keep Klaasen interested.
Luxury problems I guess.
Plum
I think that Miller must be careful - he may also bite the dust - but my guess is that Klaasen may bat 6. I also think that if Amla is replaced as opening batsman by Markram, the next problem is what to do about replacing Morne Morkel. The dark house in this case could be Wiaan Muller -who could also be used as a big pinch-hitter earlier on - being at 7.
The bowlers would then be Philander, Mulder,Rabada, Steyn/Morris/Ngidi, Sharma/Maharaj
Looking at the above there may be a general acceptance that 400 is a low score,
Mozart
You must go and see your Sbrink - you are seriously delusional and from Mozartitis.
Mozart
You must go and see your Sbrink - you are seriously delusional and from Mozartitis.
"The bowlers would then be Philander, Mulder,Rabada, Steyn/Morris/Ngidi, Sharma/Maharaj"
"Sharma"? Do u mean Shamsi?....if you do u do, well he is not international standard and Morris is past his used by date. Proteas lack a good Allrounder and an alternative spinner of world class standard. There is talk about Mulder but I've yet to see him put in at a serious level. I hope they blood some young faces for the Sri Lankan tour.
Rabada's back problem is a concern, think they've overplayed him....it stuffed the great Lillee for three years.
Sorry - I did mean Shamsi. If not him then Maharaj. I think Mulder is a personal project of the coach - why keep him as 12th man if that is nor the case?
As you can see I am not sure Steyn would make it back into the squad, Injuries kept him out of the squad for the past year - will he ever be back? I frankly do not know - but I am sure Gibson have back up plan. After all Gibson is a really good bowling coach,
More from Cricket
- CricketSo our Protea women9 REPLIES · 864 VIEWS
- CricketNice win by our ladies7 REPLIES · 564 VIEWS
- CricketRooi, here you were wondering about Keshav0 REPLIES · 500 VIEWS
- CricketICC Women's T20 Rankings0 REPLIES · 926 VIEWS
- CricketWC semi final live23 REPLIES · 933 VIEWS
- CricketIt’s going to4 REPLIES · 1,009 VIEWS