FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / CRICKET /  Steve Smith has done the wrong thing, but spare me the hysterical overreaction

Steve Smith has done the wrong thing, but spare me the hysterical overreaction

Started by Denny5 REPLIES7,468 VIEWS· 27 Mar 2018, 02:31
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
27 Mar 2018, 02:31
#1
27 Mar 2018, 02:31#1

First of all, and most importantly, I want to ask if you are OK? What about the kids? They’re the ones I worry about the most in all this.

Now turn to the person next to you, even if they’re a complete stranger, and ask if they’re coping with this shameful, gut-wrenching news that the Australian cricket team plotted to alter the state of the ball in the third Test against South Africa in Cape Town.

If anyone feels the need to take a mental health day, please do. I’m sure the boss won’t mind. Hell, take the week …

That glow on the horizon is the angry mob, pitchforks and torches in hand, and they’re coming for Steve Smith and the Australian team. A hashtag campaign is sure to break out at any minute.

It’s quite clear from the deepening fallout to the #yellowtapescandal (it’s the best I could come up with at short notice) that our national side garners very little respect from the rest of the cricketing world, which is dancing merrily on the grave of Australian cricket. The Barmy Army has material for the next decade.

It’s also quite clear that our national side isn’t particularly respected by its own supporters. There’s winning and then there’s a certain way to win. This team for some years has gone about its business like a schoolyard bully, setting imaginary “lines” of sportsmanship and morality that it bends to suit itself.

The death of Phillip Hughes was supposed to make a hard, combative and often dangerous sport just a little softer. It has not.

If we’re being truthful, former keeper-batsman Adam Gilchirst tried to show us the right path as far back as the 2003 World Cup semi-final against Sri Lanka when he was given not out despite getting a thick bottom edge on a delivery from Aravinda de Silva.

“The voice in my head was emphatic,” Gilchrist wrote in his biography released later that year. “Go. Walk. And I did … Of course, the guys back in the viewing room were stunned at what I'd done. Flabbergasted, really, that I'd do it in a World Cup semi. While I sat there, I kept going back to the fact that, well, at the end of the day, I had been honest with myself. I felt it was time that players made a stand to take back responsibility for the game. I was at ease with that. You did it for the right reasons.”

Cricket rightly holds a special place in our national conscience, from Bradman and Bodyline to the thousands of little tackers wanting a David Warner Kaboom bat off Santa.

More broadly, this column has seen first-hand the significance of sport. If not for cricket or footy or basketball or whatever, a wayward teenager from a disadvantaged socioeconomic background could easily be leading a life of a needle in his or her arm.

Sport can be that important.

But, most times, in the big old Test match of life, it is not. The collective outrage since Smith’s extraordinary post-match confession has been staggering.

Comparisons have been made to the late Hansie Cronje fixing matches. One commentator likened Smith to doped-up cyclist Lance Armstrong. Another to disgraced sprinter Ben Johnson.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was particularly outraged: “I have to say the whole nation who holds those who wear the baggy green up on a pedestal — about as high as you can get in Australia, higher than any politician that’s for sure — this is a shocking disappointment and it’s wrong and I look forward to Cricket Australia taking decisive action soon.”

Politicians taking the moral high ground? A more pressing matter for the Prime Minister might be why he’s less respected than our cricket captain.

I’ll tell you the people who aren’t picking up pitchforks and torches, joining an angry mob wanting baggy green blood.

It’s the many pub and grade and Sheffield Shield and even international cricketers who are more than aware of cricket’s dirty little secret: players often try to manipulate the ball to make it do things it wouldn’t normally do.

What about this admission from England opener Marcus Trescothick in his autobiography, about using mints to shine up the ball: “For the first time, as I dived to gather the ball at square-leg, I landed on my side and a shower of Murray Mints spewed out of my trouser pocket all over the grass right in front of the umpire. Fortunately, neither he nor the two batsmen seemed to take much notice as I scrambled around on all fours trying desperately to gather in the sweets before they started asking awkward questions.”

Former England captain Mike Atherton wrote in the Times that this incident shows a deep "hypocrisy" on Australia's behalf because they have presented themselves “as arbiters of what is appropriate and proper conduct”.

Atherton has only made fleeting reference to the day at Lord’s in 1994 when he used dirt to work on one side of the ball in a similar way Cameron Bancroft did against South Africa.

“Slightly different smell,” he said in an interview on Sky Sports. Evidently, cheating has an array of odours.

In grade cricket, in which matches are played over consecutive Saturdays and balls are kept with the bowling team, stories abound about Kookaburras being kept in the freezer for two days; about one side of the ball being so shiny the umpire could see his own reflection in it; about Blistex and beer bottle tops being stealthily used to gain an advantage.

While Smith and his “leadership group” may have plotted to cheat, while they may have unfairly deployed Bancroft to do the job and then cruelly plopped him in the firing line at the post-match media confessional, at its most basic level they have done what many others, at all levels, have done before.

If anything, it shines a light on the bowlers' losing battle against batsmen with fat bats with larger sweet spots, playing on benign wickets.

Of course, it doesn’t make any of this right. It doesn’t justify the clandestine manner in which the plan was hatched and it doesn’t diminish the harm that’s been done to this ancient game.

Smith may never captain his country again, nor should he. Warner has long coveted the position but has likely blown his chance.

But let's take a deep breath. Australian cricket will be OK. This is a perfect chance for the game to reset and take the path Gilchrist suggested.

The game will go on. I just hope that you can stay strong and find a way to go on, too.

e

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 Mar 2018, 10:38
#2
27 Mar 2018, 10:38#2

I think a lot of this is down to factors external to the ball tampering incident.

The Oz cricket team under Smith and for a while now with Warner just seem to be representative of all the things we don't like about cricket. They come across as arrogant brats.

Some of the send offs in this series have been entirely vindictive and some of the language doesn't take a lip reader to figure out.

South Africa aren't innocent in this either. It just appears as though Australia of late appear to drag teams down to a level of spitefulness and then play the victim when things kick off.

People are always looking to crucify someone when things go wrong and it has gone wrong on this tour.

Smith and Lehmann should have handled the press conference together. It stank to high hell that the coach wasn't there and has been mum since Saturday. He is the boss. Whether he knew about it or not he should have been there. The fact that he wasn't there just makes it look like he did know and had been ordered to, or chose to stand down so that he wouldn't have to answer questions which would reveal more about this.

Either CA told him to shut up or he decided that himself but in both instances all it does is make everyone feel as though cheating has happened and now we are being lied to about it even after the fact.

If was an Australian cricket fan i'd want blood.

Smith's demeanour during the conference was similar to that of a child that's been made to apologise. He just didn't look sorry, didn't appear to display anything that resembled heartfelt regret and was quite combative in much of what he said.

I'm not saying that any of this is sufficient reason to exile the man. Just that, in that moment, if Australian fans were as hurt as what we hear they were, then Smith didn't help his case at all by appearing to not care a great deal about what's happened under him. The words came out but the tone didn't match.

Hansie was caught doing something much worse but in some way held much of the public sort of on his side because it was plane to see how disgusted he was in himself. We actually felt sorry for him. And that was after he literally betrayed us.

Maybe forgiveness can only start after true regret. Who knows.

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
27 Mar 2018, 12:16
#3
27 Mar 2018, 12:16#3

I don't believe Smith understood the full meaning of what it is to be an Australian cricket captain. I think he now does. Yes it's a little too late. I'm not clear on who exactly makes up the leadership group but whoever it was it appears that not one of them dug in and said this is a no-no. I've always believed that Warner was the instigator of the idea and that he had the support of Lehmann....so did Smith.

Perhaps that explains Smith's demeanor at the press conference. Smith is a brilliant batsman and a wonderful cricketer but in a moment of weakness he strayed and made a decision he'll regret for the rest of his life. This one decision which changed the course of history will be a stain on his name which only recently was being compared to Bradman.

One wonders if that's punishment enough.

No-one should underestimate in what high esteem the Australian captain is held. Oh the public knew what crap was going on in the playing arena but they lived with it as long as it stayed on the playing field and the team kept winning fair and square.

Australian cricketers can be described as brash, highly competitive, arrogant, skilled, have a do or die will to win.....but you can wipe all of that and just call them arseholes. This attitude started a long time ago and is not peculiar to the Smith era. Personally I don't mind sledging as long as it does not involve family and that it remains on the playing field.

But this is not about my preferences.

The success of Australian cricket speaks for itself and they will show respect and applaud the opposition if they think it's warranted. But first that player has to run the gauntlet, he has to withstand the barrage man alone in the arena. We've all enjoyed some brilliant quotes coming out of the middle. 

The above is not the issue. The issue as I see it is the fact that Smith as the national captain decided to cheat....and he was assisted in doing so by Warner and perhaps Lehmann. Bancroft was just the gopher.

The country is in mourning, Smith now realizes how important it is for the Oz cricket team to win fair.....the public has tolerated their on-field behavior and kind of bit their tongues and allowed them to carry on with their crap as long as they did not cheat. There's been some sad times in this country but I've never ever seen Australians as humiliated as they are now... I will not dare broach the subject with my Ozzie mates or to any Ozzie regardless of whether he follows the game of cricket......that's how bad things are. Everyone has had something to say from the Prime Minister downwards.

Cricket will recover, we'll all move on.......I have no sympathy for Warner and Lehmann......I feel for Smith just like I did for Hansie. Apart from this incident Smith is a decent human being, noticeably no-one has raked any mud from his past. I hope he recovers enough to want to play again. Tiger did.

" I'm only human afterall...don't put the blame on me"

Remember dat one, Plum?







PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
27 Mar 2018, 15:56
#4
27 Mar 2018, 15:56#4

" I'm only human afterall...don't put the blame on me"

Think he's got that on repeat right now.

You reckon is the bad apple Denny? He seems to fit the bill.

Question is, how many South African lads working with Ozzies on construction sites around the world made sure to ask their colleagues for some yellow sandpaper first thing on Monday morning.

Kind of a lesson. Saffas love to beat Australia at cricket. They were just too smug for too long. Despite the moral victory once can't help but feel really sorry for their fans though. It's literally a situation where nobody wins. The game loses and all the fans lose.

The Proteas won this test resoundingly and yet despite it being one of the biggest drubbings of Oz in recent times, it just felt hollow.

Considering how very minor offenses these days result in people losing longstanding jobs and being ostracised from communities, one has to wonder what the punishment should be, considering the various and vast damage this incident has caused.

Read an article claiming that CA's sponsor might seek a Billion in damages. Holy hell! Just that alone is a ridiculously overwhelming consequence of all this.

If it is discovered that even more cheating had actually happened then OMG!

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Mar 2018, 16:31
#5
27 Mar 2018, 16:31#5

plum

The sponsors always worry about their image being affected by shenanigans in sporting teams and a famous advantage is the Lance Armstrong debacle.

There are  string of problems here that would make the sponsors unhappy and that could be a reason for bizarre decisions by the cricket authority in Australia:

*   The sugar in the pocket incident by Bancroft - iro which nothing ws done during the Ashes series,

*    The virtually 100% improvement in swing bowling in the local test series compared to what the same bowlers could achieve in Australia could have danger written  all over it - such things have a way of getting into the open, but the issue has already ben raised in the press

*    The Rabada incident where the decision of the Judicial Commissioner was made public, but the evidence was not - also a danger situation from the sponsors perspective. .

*    The Warner incident involving De Kock where the  Aussies claim Warrner was the vvictimhood - but was that the real story. 

*    The soap opera perspective Faf  mentioned 

  The real situation ii that the Sponsors may have large business interests in India where Aussie cricket is not all that popular. 

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
27 Mar 2018, 20:01
#6
27 Mar 2018, 20:01#6

The Ausies seem to take it harder than the rest of the cricket world, maybe because the fcked off their high horse?

— END OF THREAD —

More from Cricket