Ou Maaikie.
Ahh now we are making progress.
"Sure
I may with justification have said it at the end of 2013.
......" Now, if you would only admit and say that you have in fact said it.
This is similar to ou Dawie admitting that Duminy is a handy or more than handy fifth/part time bowler, which was the message that I was trying to get across.
"The fifth bowler issue was clear as daylight - you said the preset scenario where the Proteas played 6 batsmen and Duminy at 7 are wrong and that the Proteas should play a recognized bowler or Behardien at 7 - implying that De Kock should be sacked to allow for that scenario."Now you revert to blatant bullsh!t again. I have never questioned Duminy's batting position. My argument with Saffex has always been about Duminy's bowling. Saffex said that he is good enough to bowl 10 overs per game. In fact, you can go back to the origin of this argument. Saffex argued that he would not have Robin Peterson in the team and that he would rather have another batsman with Duminy taking over the spin bowling. Those are the facts, mate. I argued that anybody bowling 10 overs per game, has to be regarded as a front line bowler and I always said that he is one of the "fifth bowlers".
Saffex recently conceded that Duminy is not a specialist bowler and that to me is confirming that he is one of the fifth bowlers at best. Saffex tried to still back his own argument by saying that although Duminy is not a specialist bowler, he is better than a part time bowler. I did not even respond to that because it would just go back to a vicious circle again, because IMO you are either a specialist bowler or a part time bowler. Fact is the difference between me and Saffex' disagreement is marginal, IMO.
I never once said that QDK has to be sacked to make way for Behardien. Show me where I said that. I said that I could understand why Behardien was there and what his role was. Before the CWC started, the matter of Behardien came up and someone said that he could score quick runs at the end, and I agree with that, showing his run rates in ODI's etc. He has shown against the UAE that he can score quick runs at the end when he scored 64* off only 31 balls.
This was Saffex' last remark on the matter of Duminy's bowling:
Saffex Status: Hall Of Fame Posts: 11729
RE: Young pop guns fire blanks...weaknesses exposed March 13, 2015, 11:18:34
There is no reason in the world that a part time bowler cant bowl 10 over you profoundly stupid man.
We all know JP is a not a specialist bowler, no-one ever said he was so once again you are exposing yourself for the dunce you are. Kindly point out where I said he was a specialist bowler.
I have said he is better than a part timer and more than capable of bowling 10.......we all know he is a specialist bat who is a handy off spinner.
Why do I think he can do the job as a spinner.......for the simple reason that his bowling technique is spot on for a spinner as is his flight and the little turn he gets. His action and technique is better than Phangiso, the specialist spinner in the squad.
Exposed once again.....drum roll
Fact is that I never said that Duminy cannot bowl 10 overs. My view is that you cannot give him all the spin bowling responsibilities, like Saffex wanted to do at the time of our Duminy/Peterson argument.
I have never been "agog" about Rossouw opening with Amla. Show me where I said that.
My argument about QDK and his batting postion was clear. Either keep him or let him go down to around no 4. I never once agreed that he should bat at 7. I said that rather drop him totally than to have him bat at no 7. That would have defeated the entire object of getting him back in form.
I have also never been keen for AB de Villiers to rake the gloves. Not in ODIs nor in tests. You can go register on SS, if you so wish, and go check on the heated arguments where I disagreed with AB taking the gloves unless it was an absolute emergency, like when Boucher got injured in Taunton, England.
I still believe that AB is not the ideal captain, even though he got it right in this particular match. His decision making is suspect. His field placings and the use of his bowlers is quite often questionable. As an example, he, as the captain, should know how to handle his own batting spell. It has happened on a number of occasions, especially against Pakistan, that he was the one on fire and on strike and then he took a single of the first run of an over. Silly mistake because that brought on the new batsman who started wasting balls by scratching around to try and find a single to get AB back on strike.
I have nothing but admiration for AB as a cricket player but he is not the best ODI captain. He will never be the ODI captain that Graeme Smith or even Johan Botha was.