The moment the WC semi was lost

 Dawie, if the stumps were in the ball's way then de Kock wouldn't need to catch it, would he ? Stop distorting the FACTS .

Thanks Pakie for the pics, unbelievable that they aren't able to help ou Dawie see sense .

 Fuck blob you are thick......as the photo clearly shows the stumps are not in the balls way you idiot for if that was the case the ball would have hit the wicket you profoundly stupid man. The stumps are in de Kocks way. He has to stretch round them to try catch the ball as the photo clearly shows.
Vlagshit listen to the commentary you thick prick it tells you the ball skids in off wet surface. But better still watch the footage yourself but given your advanced age I doubt your old eyes are up to it.
Talk about a bunch of thick twits

Pakie you dunce that ball should have come in bail hight. There is no ball in that picture and if it is where you say it is that is low.
de Kock moving towards leg is a natural reaction for a keeper, they all do it and it had no impact on his positioning behind the stumps waiting for the throw in.
The throw in was underarm and misdirected. de Kock was correctly positioned behind the stumps to receive the ball. Unfortunately the ball was thrown to the right of the stumps and skidded through off the wet surface.
de Kock had to try reach for it with the stumps in his way. For those the play the game will know that in those circumstances when the ball skids through awkwardly the best bet is to swoop at it.
de Kock did no wrong. The throw in was off target and skidded off the surface. Had it been thrown in over arm and accurately it would have bounced over the stumps and de Kock would have effected the stumping with ease as he has proved how good a keeper he is ever since he has taken the gloves.

 Pictures Dawie, pictures. Where are the pictures, mate? Why don't you just trump Pakie with some images of your own?
Oh and by the way, some times things are best judged when you switch off the sound and ignore the commentators, and see for yourself. I have seen Pakie's pictures, so why don't you give us something to support your "theory". Something..... anything...... as long as it is not the commentators' opinion.