My take on Ngidi is fully justified by facts and the facts are -
* of the bowlers he took the least wickets in the latest SriLankan series;
* he played in 7 tests and took 22 wickets in tests as against the 8 tests of Nortje in which he took 30 wickets;
* he bowls at an average pace of 132 kph - which is a medium pace bowler and not a fast pace bowler - he is inaccurate when bowling at speed higher than 130 kph;
* he took no wickets in the first innings in the second test against SL and due to inaccurate bowling gave away runs; and
* he can be effective in two to three overs - provided his pace is reduced to roundabout 130 kph - but in any more overs bowled in the session he becomes expensive and ineffective,
Bowlers like Ngidi get found out by top batsmen and become less effective sooner rather than later in their careers.
Being ineffective in bowling in the first innings and being inaccurate in the second innings were sufficient grounds for a tongue-lashing by Boucher,
Ngidi was a miracle bowler when he came on the scene and became less effective subsequently. At present he is an average medium pace bowler - nothing more. The fact is that he got found out not only by top batsmen - but also by his IPL club and whatever you may think, a bowler doing badly in IPL - where he has to bowl against the top batsmen from all over the world - is not ever going to be effective in other formats of the game.
He may be sent to Pakistan - but as a result of the return of Rabada from injury he is unlikely to be used in any games. Please also note that there was not a word about Ngidi said by Boucher in his interview and high praise of Sipamla and Mulder - so would he have criticized them and also Nortje after the latter's sterling performance in the first innings - hence my deduction that Ngidi was the one who were in hot water with Boucher when it came to bowling,
.