FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Believe it or not....this is the NY Times

Believe it or not....this is the NY Times

Started by Mozart6 REPLIES796 VIEWS· 28 May 2021, 03:38
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 May 2021, 03:38
#1
28 May 2021, 03:38#1

A staunch supporter of the ‘it came from nature’ school.....today they published this damning criticism of ‘fact checking’ with a bias:


Why all the dismissals?

It appears to be a classic example of groupthink, 

exacerbated by partisan polarization.

Global health officials seemed unwilling to confront 

Chinese officials, who insist the virus jumped from an 

animal to a person.

In the U.S., one of the theory’s earliest advocates was Tom 

Cotton, the Republican senator from Arkansas who often 

criticizes China — and who has a history of promoting 

falsehoods (like election fraud that didn’t happen). In this

 case, though, Cotton was making an argument with 

plausible supporting evidence.

The media’s coverage of his argument was flawed, 

Sub-stack’s Matthew Yglesias has written. Some coverage 

exaggerated Cotton’s comments to suggest he was claiming 

that China had deliberately released the virus as a biological 

weapon. (Cotton called that “very unlikely.”) And some 

scientists and others also seem to have decided that if 

Cotton believed something — and Fox News and Donald 

Trump echoed it — the idea had to be wrong.

The result, as Yglesias called it, was a bubble of fake 

consensus. Scientists who thought a lab leak was plausible, 

like Chan, received little attention. Scientists who thought 

the theory was wacky received widespread attention. It’s a 

good reminder: The world is a complicated place, where 

almost nobody is always right or always wrong.



MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
28 May 2021, 03:57
#2
28 May 2021, 03:57#2

And here’s another false consensus. ....they accuse Cotton of promoting ‘election fraud that did not happen’. It happened ....this influential, capable  Newspaper failed to correct it’s Russia collusion stance, even though it had to know it was wrong by the time of the election. Leaving 50% of the public to vote believing something that was patently false. That was election fraud.

The underlying issue here is the the media decided getting rid of Trump justified any tactics, even those which trashed their long held principles of ethical journalism. Now we are in the process of revisiting those issues and there are many of them.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
28 May 2021, 08:17
#3
28 May 2021, 08:17#3

If there  was actually election fraud  discovered  during  audits being undertaken in Arizona. Georgia and other states - what will the New York Tines say then?   Probably discredit the process  used in the audits - not so.?     

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
28 May 2021, 08:31
#4
28 May 2021, 08:31#4

One can't help wondering what their motivation was.

Did the media lie and continue to perpetuate the lie simply to save face?

It started from before Trump took office and it never abated, even when the economy was booming as a result of his administration. 

It would have been easier to turn around and report fairly when the US was booming in 2019. 

Why didn't they?


RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
28 May 2021, 09:14
#5
28 May 2021, 09:14#5
Well, that's one take on it . . . even if it's just the brainwashed Trumpanzee view.
The real reason the media turned against Bozo was because he was a weak, rude, boastful, self-serving and incompetent liar who plunged the world into a pandemic crisis with his refusal to take the Trumpvirus seriously until it was too late.
You Trumpanzees can spin it as much as you like but the fact remains, Bozo was a twice-impeached one-term failure . . . and the naughty globalist MSM media or whatever you want to call them have been fully vindicated.   
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
28 May 2021, 10:06
#6
28 May 2021, 10:06#6

Oh dang it...do I really need to do this?

My comment asks a question that clearly has an answer beginning around 2016 and ending in 2019.

It started from before Trump took office and it never abated, even when the economy was booming as a result of his administration. It would have been easier to turn around and report fairly when the US was booming in 2019

Why didn't they?

Pre pandemic

The real reason the media turned against Bozo was because he was a weak, rude, boastful, self-serving and incompetent liar 

Post pandemic

plunged the world into a pandemic crisis with his refusal to take the Trumpvirus seriously until it was too late




CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
28 May 2021, 14:35
#7
28 May 2021, 14:35#7

Rooinek

If Trump was weak - the Russians and Chinese would have  shit on him and  he would have done nothing about it.   They never tried that stunt on Trump.      They did that on Biden and he could do nothing about it, because he is not only weak - he is also corrupt and the Russians and Chinese know it and despise him for that..   He had created more crisis situations in the USA than the country had to endure even from the crooked Obama.

The rest of your statement is looney as well - but you know you are a weak-minded idiot easily to be brainwashed.

So according to the above Trump was responsible for the virus -  total lie and distortion that is coming back to haunt the Democrats and they will self-destruct as a result.             

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes