Bill Clinton panics as Epstein Files reveal Damning evidence.

Yup slick Willie is in big trouble. In fact Willie and Crooked Hilary are refusing to testify in Congress. This could lead to jail time as it did to Bannon and Navarro.

President Trump masterfully manouvred the hapless Demonrats into demanding the release of the Epstein Files. This made anybody with an I Q above sixty wonder why the democrats didn't do it over Biden's illigitimate 4 year presidency.

Secondly, nobody now can accuse Trump of going after his political enemies regarding the Epstein Files.

It's a thing amazing to behold that the lefty loons at the White House Press briefing are not asking any question about the Epstein Files now. They realize what buffoons they have made of themselves.

Their dishonesty was highlighted when democrats released a photo a Trump surrounded by woman whose faces were blanked out. This of course suggesting the woman were under age victims.

However the New York Post produced the unblanked photo and it was of models doing a promotion at Mar a Lago. Bwahahahahahaha.

Take a look at why Slick Willie and Hillary could well find themselves in jail.

New York Times say they have found no evidence of Trump wrong doing.

slick willie in action

These are the globalist monsters that are destroying Western civilization.

I also call them Luciferians.

:)

-

---

Nasty!

Good one, BB

Allow me to speculate a touch;

1) There were probably posts on here about how Trump had an issue with realising the Epstein file because he was in them...

2) I've heard that the files, or some portion of them have been released...but I take it that's Trump wasn't in them. At least, not to any incriminating degree or we would have heard about it on here by now.

3) There will be no posts about the people that were actually in them to a degree that suggests a level of criminality.

4) Those that were so invested in how evil they could say Trump is for his Epstein involvement, don't really care about what is evil unless they can tag Trump's name into it somewhere.

I haven't been keeping up with it, nor many of the anti Trump posts on here, so perhaps somebody could lighten me as to how close my speculation is to being accurate.

1) There were probably posts on here about how Trump had an issue with realising the Epstein file because he was in them.

Trump promised to release the Epstein Files during his election campaign. He wasn't made to do that but he or is campaign team or both decided that would be a vote winner during the election and it proved to be very popular promise with his MAGA base.

Trump then won the election and refused to release the files. This didn't go down well with his base supporters and it also opened the door for political attacks from the opponents who sensed it was a potential weakness for Trump.

As time went on Trump refusal to release the file because increasingly strident and he also started to attack those people call for their release. This merely Barbra Streisand the issue creating a suspicion that he was hiding something. Neither his base nor his political opponents would let it go.

My personal view is that Trump is in the Epstein files in some manner, but likely not in a way that proves he was involved in any sort of abuse of women. Worst case scenario for Trump is their so evidence emerged that Trump knew about Epstein's abuse of women/young girls but I'd say most likely it's just some embarrassing photo's for Trump.

2) I've heard that the files, or some portion of them have been released...but I take it that's Trump wasn't in them. At least, not to any incriminating degree or we would have heard about it on here by now.

Yes partially released and heavily redacted, which is violation of the law as they were supposed to be released in full. Any redaction were also suppose to have been explained, they were not. The Trump administration claim this is to do with protecting the victims and them having not having enough time to properly release all the files properly redacted in time. While no one has issues with protecting victims this reason has been stanchly criticized because not only have they had a month to vet the files since they were legally obligated to do so, the required release of these files by law was a near political inevitability for many months, they should have been ready.

We also know for a fact from leaks and previous legal cases, Trump does appear in these files at least once if not several times. Several other prominent figures are also known to be in the files as well. If they and Trump don't show up at some point with Trump administration controlling what's being released it's going look highly suspicious.

3) There will be no posts about the people that were actually in them to a degree that suggests a level of criminality.

Being in photo's with Epstein does not make you guilty of a crime. That applies to Trump as well. The difference is none of the other people in the files appeared to be going to the lengths that Trump was to block releasing them.

4) Those that were so invested in how evil they could say Trump is for his Epstein involvement, don't really care about what is evil unless they can tag Trump's name into it somewhere

If any evidence comes to light of any wrong doing by anyone in those files, be it Bill Clinton, Woody Allen, Mick Jagger, Michael Jackson, Noam Chomsky etc etc they absolutely should be investigated. Chomsky for example had previously downplayed his association with Epstein but subsequent revelations showed he a more substantial relationship than he let on.

But Trump has created this mess himself, he promised something and when he refused to deliver on it he made himself look oh so suspicious. Karma is a bitch.

I haven't been keeping up with it, nor many of the anti Trump posts on here, so perhaps somebody could lighten me as to how close my speculation is to being accurate.

It's as if Caroline Leavitt handed you the White House response lines to all questions on the Epstein files.

LOL and it looks like you get all your spin from MSNMC an CNN.

"No, Donald Trump did not make releasing the Epstein files (or a purported "client list") a central or prioritized part of his 2024 campaign platform. It was not featured in major speeches, rallies, official policy announcements, or his core messaging, which focused on issues like immigration, the economy, crime, and foreign policy.However, when directly asked about it in interviews during the campaign, Trump expressed openness to declassifying or releasing related files:

1. In a June 2024 Fox News interview, he said "Yeah, yeah, I would" when asked about declassifying the Epstein files (along with JFK and 9/11 files), though he added caveats about potential "phony stuff" that could unfairly affect lives.
2. In a September 2024 podcast with Lex Fridman, he said he'd be "inclined" to release them, had "no problem" with it, and would "certainly take a look."

These statements were widely shared (including by his campaign's social media), and many supporters and media outlets interpreted them as a promise or vow. Some sources describe it as something he "vowed" or "promised" on the trail, while others note it was responsive to questions rather than self-initiated.Fact-checking and reporting confirm he mentioned it only a handful of times, always when prompted, and it was not a proactive campaign pillar. Claims that he "ran on" or heavily prioritized releasing the files are inaccurate. Post-election, the issue gained traction among his base, leading to pressure and eventual partial releases in 2025.

The release of these Epstein files is the biggest joke of the millennium so far.

They took this long to cleanse some of the stuff they were prepared to release.

If you don't think that Bozo has pulled everything referring to him then you must be very stupid.

Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files more than anyone else, other than Epstein himself.

So, of course, he does not want it released.

So you think there is a cabal of people deliberately destroying or altering evidence to defend Trump. Risking going to prison. Or perhaps you think the Donald is on his computer doing that himself…,,yes brilliant, you nailed it,

Back to the top….no Woke warrior is answering my question

Rooinek Hall Of Famer

16,237 posts

Dec 22, 2025, 16:42

The release of these Epstein files is the biggest joke of the millennium so far.

They took this long to cleanse some of the stuff they were prepared to release.

If you don't think that Bozo has pulled everything referring to him then you must be very stupid.

Countless pics of Clinton ...........

Let's apply the "redacted" logic to something else.

As a long time follower of the UFO topic, some of documents released are, in some cases, so heavily redacted that that barely a title is visible on the page.

...the above is a report from about 70 years ago.

So, is the US government hiding UFOs?

This dang forum. As soon as I post an image and the url fails, the "update comment" box vanishes.

lol

Let's apply the "redacted" logic to something else.

As a long time follower of the UFO topic, some of documents released are, in some cases, so heavily redacted that that barely a title is visible on the page.

So, is the US government hiding UFOs?

probably up Trump's arse.

The k@k you guys believe just because you hate Trump...insane desperation.

Remember,peeps when Donald Junior Trump sent his defence attorney to provide Maxwell with a favourable interview? She claimed that Clinton had nothing to do with all the stuff. She also claimed that Trump had nothing to do with all the stuff. One liberal conciliation of this: Maxwelll ied about Clinton and told the truth about Trump, Maxwell has not for sure TDS so she can be trusted on Trump.