FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Bozo thinks 138 million Sri Lankans died in terror attack . . .

Bozo thinks 138 million Sri Lankans died in terror attack . . .

Started by Rooinek39 REPLIES831 VIEWS· 22 Apr 2019, 12:16
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:16
#1
22 Apr 2019, 12:16#1

Here is Bozo's tweet in the wake of the Sri Lankan terror attack . . .



Wehe . . . 138 million?

The total population of Sri Lanka is 22 million. What kind of gigantic fool would even consider that the number of 138 million people killed might be accurate?

Bozo is the biggest fool to ever lead any country. The fact that this vain, stupid and self-serving little man leads the world's most powerful nation is nothing short of scary.

Come on Democrats, impeach the clown. You have enough grounds even based on the selected bits of the Mueller report that Bozo's stooge Barr allowed to be released. Impeach the embarrassing fool . . . and let's see the censored bits of the report.

138 million . . . pfffffffffffffffffhahahahahahahahahaha!



CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:26
#2
22 Apr 2019, 12:26#2
The Russian Hoax has imploded and now they latch onto the unforgiving unpresidential, low down, inhuman sin of committing a typo in a Twitter post. What a scumbag this guy Donald Trump is. Worst of the worst.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:29
#3
22 Apr 2019, 12:29#3
Which of the Dems should replace Trump right now? Bumbling Pelosi, Dodgy Chuck Schumer, The Bar Tender, Bullshit Bernie, Scaly Ukraine deal Biden, pot Smoking Kamala, Spartacus Booker?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:31
#4
22 Apr 2019, 12:31#4

Have you ever heard about misrepresentation - there is a lot of mistakes made by politicians on both sides and when it comes to stupidity the Democrats takes the cake,   Watch out for what Nancy Pelosi comes up with,

However, there is zero chance that Trump would be impeached and more chances that a string of Democrats end up in jail for corruption and collusion to undermine the USA.   The Republicans have a majority in the Senate and they are going to use it before the 2020 election to show up what the Clintons with the help of Obama did in 2016 and subsequently.   

Meantime the economy is booming and polls indicate that the Democrats are losing support in the working class and both the African American and Latino communities because of employment opportunities opened up for them through employment r\creation.

So there is no chance of Trump being impeached and every chance of some very long prison sentences of a number of Democrats and a definite loss of the 2020 presidential and congressional election.    

   .         

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:36
#5
22 Apr 2019, 12:36#5
A typo?
He had to type the numbers "1", "3" and "8". Are you suggesting that after he typed those numbers his finger slipped and he miraculously typed the series of letters that make up the word "million"?
That would be quite some typo!
As for the Democrat contender in 2020, ou Maaik and I took a bet many months ago where the loser has to be nice to Moffie for a week. I haven't changed my prediction and I don't think ou Maaik has either.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:39
#6
22 Apr 2019, 12:39#6
Yeah right. He really did think that 138m died in that attack now, did he? You are even more gullible than shifty Adam Schiff.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:48
#7
22 Apr 2019, 12:48#7

Ceradyne

There is a group of Communists in the DP - they name themselves as Social Democrats.   Sanders is the leader and the following is included in that shady group:-

Nancy Pelosi, Bete O'Rourke, Elizabeth Warden, Maxime Waters, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (a protegee of Sanders), Pete Buttigieg, etc

The  funny part is that a weak leader like Joe Biden will not be able to control that mob and they will case havoc for the Democrats in future.   

Rooinek is a big supporter of  Bete O'Rourke and thinks he will be the Democratic Party nominee as presidential candidate.   But he has only support of about 8%  in the DP and is unlikely to make it as candidate.   

Biden is apparently the leader in the Democratic Party list - but he also has huge problems as a candidate.    He is closely linked to Ukraine and is likely to be in trouble because of that. 

I do not understand Rooinek - he is not in favour of open borders in SA - but favour open borders in the USA and Europe.   He may be leftwing in outlook, but support the real reactionary socialists in both the USA and  in the EU.    What is going on?            

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:49
#8
22 Apr 2019, 12:49#8
Well, that is what he typed . . . and if you think typing the word "million" after the numbers 138 could possibly be a typo then you're the gullible fool. Trust me on this.
"Typo" . . . waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 12:56
#9
22 Apr 2019, 12:56#9
"Rooinek is a big supporter of  Bete O'Rourke and thinks he will be the Democratic Party nominee as presidential candidate."
Ou Maaik, nowhere have I ever said that I support Beto O'Rourke or any other Democrat . . . or even the Democratic Party.
Just because I think O'Rourke might be the Democrat candidate (or at least I thought so back in 2018 when we took the bet) doesn't make me a supporter . . . just as predicting the Sharks will lose a Super Rugby match doesn't mean I'm no longer a Sharks supporter.
You bellow like a castrated water buffalo when Moffie and others put words in your mouth . . . don't do it yourself. 
I couldn't give a toss about Beto O'Rourke or the Democrat party.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 13:01
#10
22 Apr 2019, 13:01#10

Yeah right Rooinek. So, I guess that if I was to follow your line of reasoning and started to try and convince you that Nancy Pelosi believes that Bush is the president of the US, you would agree with me. She has, after all referred to Bush as the president in numerous occasions, despite being corrected every time. 




CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 13:09
#11
22 Apr 2019, 13:09#11

“Biden is apparently the leader in the Democratic Party list “

No, he is not. Bernie is and that is solely according to the MSM, based on their perception that the leader in the race is the candidate who has attracted the highest amounts of money from donors. I do not think that anybody within the party even knows who to support at this stage. Especially due to the crappy lineup. Bernie is the only one who could have challenged Trump back in 2016 but that is not going to happen this time around. 

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 13:17
#12
22 Apr 2019, 13:17#12
Ceradunce, I know what a typo is. That wasn't a typo.
So Nancy Pelosi is a fool as well . . . wow, who knew . . . but she's nowhere near as big a fool as your beloved Bozo and all you Trumpanzees who can't see through him.
Back to topic, Bernie Sanders is clearly the most credible Democrat candidate but they can't nominate him because they know Americans could never vote a socialist in as president . . . not after all the McCarthy anti-socialist/communist Kool-Aid that they drank all those years ago.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
22 Apr 2019, 13:37
#13
22 Apr 2019, 13:37#13

Rooinek

I do have three real interests left and that does not include sex -  I am afraid that what should be hard is soft and what should be soft is hard at my age. 

That leaves rugby, cricket and politics - while I remain interested in history.   

I make s study of all three main interests and comments according to what I found - not what Mozart or Beeno write (I have warned them in the past is that they are wrong in their assumptions.  In general I do not believe in  opinion polling either - they have been totally wrong for a variety of reasons. 

What I do take note of is the fact that some leaders pay lip service to the voters and then leave them in the lurch subsequently.   The fact is that the vast majority of voters in countries are at present worse off than they were 20 years ago.   The situation is that they are feeling the pinch badly and am unsure of their future.   The reaction is that they are fighing back against the governing elite,   That fightback started with the Brexit referendum  and the 2016 US presidential election and there are no signs that the fight-back trend has changed in other countries as well.   

I cannot see how that will change soon.   Fact is we are awaiting the EU elections in two weeks time and  the indications are that the reactionaries against the EU are going to get more vites than other groups of parties in the EU.   

The UK is in total chaos because of Brexit and it might easily happen that the Conservative a nd Labour parties may just deteriorate to the level where their sister parties in France and Italy are.   They may end up as fringe parties as well.

As to rugby I differ all the time with Mozart, Pakie and co.   Fact is they are totally addicted to criticism of some players (their pet hate players) and according to them Erasmus as a coach is the pits.   

Cricket is the same - they adore the elderly and hate the younger players.             

   

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
22 Apr 2019, 13:41
#14
22 Apr 2019, 13:41#14

Hahahahaha ou rooitwit is so consistent. He loves checking people's spelling mistakes as well. Then the oaf makes a spelling mistake and like clockwork the EGG lands on this EGG MAGNET.

President Trump is communicating just about 24/7 so he is bound to miss peak at some point. By the way way Rooijackass what do you say about the Russian HOAX now. BWHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA. 

Next up for ou rooitwit is the unmasking of the coup plotters and other demonrat crimes. 

President Trump just keeps winning!!! 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 14:54
#15
22 Apr 2019, 14:54#15
So, Bernie, the multi millionaire democratic socialist is the most credible Dem candidate to take out Trump. Unbelievable.
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 15:09
#16
22 Apr 2019, 15:09#16

Bernie’s most credible and trustworthy sidekick AOC:


RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 15:41
#17
22 Apr 2019, 15:41#17
Ceradunce, instead of trashing Bernie and deriding what I said, why don't you debate like an adult instead of a child and actually put up who you think is a more credible candidate if you don't think it's Bernie Sanders?
Hmmm?

Just a thought . . . use it, don't use it . . .
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Apr 2019, 15:43
#18
22 Apr 2019, 15:43#18
So Peeper thinks Trump really believed 138 million people died and 600 were injured.......a credible mistake. Perhaps he could explain to us what manner of attack produces one injury for every 230000 people killed. Go ahead Peeper enlighten us. It was an unfortunate error given the sad incident involved....crossed wires. But the message was clear: 'we stand ready to help'.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 15:56
#19
22 Apr 2019, 15:56#19
That's what Bozo said, Moffie. Don't ask me to explain why he said it.
So, Moffie, who do you think would be the most credible candidate the Democrats could put up?
Please note I didn't say "best candidate", I said "most credible".
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 16:00
#20
22 Apr 2019, 16:00#20
I am afraid, Rooinek, I do not see a single credible candidate in the entire list. Honestly, I don’t. If, IMO, none of them has any credibility, how do you expect me to single out one of them as having more credibility than any of the other.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 16:11
#21
22 Apr 2019, 16:11#21
Hang on Ceradunce, when I suggested that Sanders was the most credible candidate that the Dems could put up , you found that statement to be "unbelievable" . . . that is the word you chose to use . . . as in it's hard to believe that someone might think of Bernie Sanders as the most credible Dem candidate.
Agree? That is what you said, right?
Okay, so now I'm just wondering . . . if the guy who lost the 2016 Dem nomination to Hillary Clinton by 54% to 46% is an "unbelievable" suggestion for "most credible" Dem candidate, what exactly is it that you can't believe? Your response also implies that you must have several much more credible people in mind. Who are they?
Please note this is not an invitation for you to start droning on about how awful Democrats or, how useless Bernie Sanders is or to start putting up pictures of AOC . . . we've heard it all before. I'm being very specific. What is "unbelievable" about someone suggesting Bernie Sanders as the most credible candidate and who do you think would make a more credible nomination?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Apr 2019, 16:11
#22
22 Apr 2019, 16:11#22
Ah, okay, no speculation on this unique form of attack. But on the Dems, how does one find a credible candidate in an unqualified field. What institutions have any of these people run......they are all staff people. And with Obama we saw the downside of an unqualified, 'hopeful' candidate. Biden as vice president is probably the closest to somebody with relevant leadership experience. But lots of baggage...he just looks like baggage. Bernie is Jewish, old, white and a socialist/communist......rightly or wrongly each one of those affiliations will turn off part of the electorate.....not credible.
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
22 Apr 2019, 16:18
#23
22 Apr 2019, 16:18#23
Oh, okay, so Bernie is not the most credible because he's an old, Jewish and white communist.
That didn't stop him running Hillary close in 2016 when he picked up 46% of the nominations.
Like Ceradunce, you're quite sure he's not the most credible candidate but you won't say who you think is more credible? We know it's not Biden according to you because of baggage . . . and Biden hasn't officially even entered the race yet.
Okay, so we should just believe that you and Ceradunce each know of at least one much more credible candidate but you're not going to tell us who that is?
Spare me any childish "they're all useless" replies. We know they're a bunch of incompetent liars - they're politicians after all - and explain to me why the guy who lost the last nomination by a narrow margin would be such an incredible candidate this time around. What has changed so much in 4 years?
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
22 Apr 2019, 16:21
#24
22 Apr 2019, 16:21#24

The demonrats are a far left bunch of loons so just the party for the daft rooijackass. 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
22 Apr 2019, 17:29
#25
22 Apr 2019, 17:29#25
Rooinek, I will say it again. Unbelievable. I do find it unbelievable that one could even contemplate Bernie being a candidate with any credibility, let alone being the most credible.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
22 Apr 2019, 18:00
#26
22 Apr 2019, 18:00#26
There is no iron clad rule that one of these Dem candidates has to be competent. Even by the low standards set by Bush Junior, Obama and Clinton these people all look unqualified. And Bernie looks good for the communist half of the Dem vote....that gives him a quarter of the total vote. Obama got elected because he convinced the 'enlightened ' republicans he was moderate. Turned out to be wrong....but Bernie doesn't have much hope of walking back 50 years of hair on fire, nutty, communism. Here's a hint, don't believe what they say....believe what they do.
DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
23 Apr 2019, 08:11
#27
23 Apr 2019, 08:11#27

I am not aware of one single accusation yet, that Piss Mint has made about Trump or directed to Trump, here on this site, that has come true

Yes, he has made typo's, yes...….he has misquoted some words, yes, he is not the most charming man you will ever meet...….

But as for you and your statements targeting Trump Piss Mint...…….

It's always...… the same...…..just wait till this report comes out...……..

Or

Watch how all of you will eat your words when this information becomes available...….

Or

Check how all of you "trumpanzees" will have all this egg on your faces because Pelosi..... blah blah blah

Or

I assure you, that you are all stupid, and you will all be shown up for the idiots you are when the Mueller report is released...…..

And

Guys, this president is going to be impeached for collusion with Russia..... mark my words, it's a guarantee...……

And sooooooo much more from Piss Mint

So...……. having said all this, please take into account who is making these statements and accusations about T rump all the time on this forum, and also see just how incredibly stupid he has been made to look on this site.... every time he opens his mouth about Trump

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
23 Apr 2019, 09:23
#28
23 Apr 2019, 09:23#28

Yeah, lets totally ignore the fact that he is reaching out to Sri Lanaka and showing solidarity. 

How dare the orange Nazi offer the darkest of dark Asian people his condolences and assistance.

Damn, if only there was even a smidgen of truth to Russia-Gate, then we'd be rid of the hate monger for ever.  


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
23 Apr 2019, 09:32
#29
23 Apr 2019, 09:32#29

Mozart

Bernie will soon be 79 years old and by the time the elections coming around he will be 80 years of age.    Reagan was elected for his second tern at the age of 80 - bit that was unique in US history where no US presidential candidate has been selected for a first term at that age.

The situation is that all the senior DP leading politicians are getting to the senile state or really their already.   Those include by election time next year -

*    Vice-President Joe Biden           -    78 

*    Senator Chuck Schummer         -     70

*    Bernie Sanders                           -     80

*    Senator  Dianne Feinstein          -     87

*    Senator Patrick Leahy                -     80

*    Rep Nancy Pelosi                       -     80

*    Rep  Maxime Waters                 -      83

So none of the above are  likely to be around much longer and all of them have huge problems that could bite them standing for any future elections.     It looks to me that they have no fresh ideas and is being led by the nose by some younger politico's  or grooming younger politico's to succeed them.   They all - bar perhaps the weak-minded Biden - are in the  Democratic Socialist category - ie closet Communists.  

The younger Democratic Socialists  -  Warden, Harris, O'Rourke and Alexandria Ocasio-Sanchez  have all made utter fools of themselves in speeches.   For the Democratic Party it would be wise for  them not to keep listening to the empty vessels making most noise and start looking at younger moderate candidates.

I believe for the future their is one candidate of the RP's to look at and that is Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida - the youngest Governor in the USA with an approval rating of 67%  at this stage,   He seems to be the main successor once Trump completes his second term as President,  He seems to be political favourite of he Latino's as well.    Other younger Republicans that may come into the picture are Senators Cruz and Rubio.                

   

  

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
23 Apr 2019, 09:43
#30
23 Apr 2019, 09:43#30
“Posted by: Plum (3605 posts) Apr 23, 2019, 09:23 Yeah, lets totally ignore the fact that he is reaching out to Sri Lanaka and showing solidarity.“ The other part of the Sri Lankan bombing is this, Plum, I have been waiting to see if there are going to be any of those from this forum who would be outraged like they were after the NZ mosque attack. Nothing. They have disappeared into thin air.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
23 Apr 2019, 10:08
#31
23 Apr 2019, 10:08#31

Exactly Cera

The world has become so used to Islamic terror that it's just par for the course now. 

And yes, naturally, these bombings have noting to do with iSlam. The scripture doesn't promise its dogs great rewards for holy sacrifice. It's all a pipe dream.

One wonders if the "peace loving" people of  Pakistan will ever have enough control of their country for us to see a test match there again. Nothing to do with iSlam of course.

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
23 Apr 2019, 10:33
#32
23 Apr 2019, 10:33#32

I still ask why it is not condemned though, by the higher powers that be in the Islamic faith around the world

Not enough condemnation...……… too much silence

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
23 Apr 2019, 10:59
#33
23 Apr 2019, 10:59#33

@DA

In their "faith" you are not allowed to refer to a non-believer as a "victim".  

Here.. Pretty much says it all.

“Muhammad is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.”

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
23 Apr 2019, 11:19
#34
23 Apr 2019, 11:19#34

The great thing about the last few years has been the unmasking of the marxist/globalists and Islam. 

The war against these vile ideologies has begun in earnest as people realize what they are doing to their countries and the world. 

Rooitwit of course is always getting it wrong despite my best efforts to set him on the right path. Now he has many others trying to help him so maybe we will see results 


BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
23 Apr 2019, 11:35
#35
23 Apr 2019, 11:35#35

The silence of the nz oaks is disgusting. 

Clinton and Hussein Obozo at the same time talk of Easter Worshippers. Can't use the term Christians. 

So now it is clear that this was an Islamic terror attack.

Will we ever learn the truth about Notre Dame. At least it highlighted the fact that in 2018   875 French  Catholic churches were vandalised. 

DA
Devil's AdvocatePro7,008 posts
23 Apr 2019, 12:05
#36
23 Apr 2019, 12:05#36

“Muhammad is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.”

Pathetic...…….

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
23 Apr 2019, 16:21
#37
23 Apr 2019, 16:21#37
'Word from international intelligence agencies that a local group was planning attacks apparently didn't reach the prime minister's office until after the massacre, exposing the continuing political turmoil in the highest levels of the Sri Lankan government. On April 11, Priyalal Disanayaka, Sri Lanka's deputy inspector general of police, signed a letter addressed to the directors of four Sri Lankan security agencies, warning them that a local group was planning a suicide attack in the country. The intelligence report attached to his letter, which has circulated widely on social media, named the group allegedly plotting the attack, National Towheed Jamaar, identifying its leader as Zahran Hashmi, and said it was targeting "some important churches" in a suicide terrorist attack that was planned to take place "shortly." The report named six individuals likely to be involved in the plot, including someone it said had been building support for Zahran and was in hiding since the group clashed with another religious organization in March 2018. On Monday, Sri Lanka's health minister held up a copy of the intelligence report while describing its contents, spurring questions about what Sri Lanka police had done to protect the public from an attack.'
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
23 Apr 2019, 23:34
#38
23 Apr 2019, 23:34#38
Hypocrisy. ..even an agnostic like Plum can recognize it...Plum, keep on searching, you are on the right track. There is right and wrong for some odd reason...and it fits in somewhere...been distorted a bit, but there is right and wrong...good luck in finding it
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
24 Apr 2019, 11:36
#39
24 Apr 2019, 11:36#39

"Apr 22, 2019, 15:41


Ceradunce, instead of trashing Bernie and deriding what I said, why don't you debate like an adult instead of a child and actually put up who you think is a more credible candidate if you don't think it's Bernie Sanders?"

I have searched to see if there was an article on CNN which reflect their opinions on Bernie's views on voting rights. a Google search came up with many results for all of the news outlets but none from CNN, bar links to their footage of the town hall with the Dem candidates. I then changed the search to see if I can find a specific article by CNN. The search only produced one result from CNN and that basically only mentioned what he said. No commentary. I will search You Tube later to see if any of the usual suspects like Chris Cuomo or little Brian Stelter has come up with some kind of excuse for Bernie, the "most credible" Dem candidate. This is the article.

Sanders says the right to vote should be extended 'even for terrible people' like Boston Marathon bomber

(CNN)Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders said he thinks everyone should have the right to vote -- even the Boston Marathon bomber.

Asked at a CNN town hall Monday night if he thought felons should be allowed to vote -- even while they're incarcerated, not just after they're released -- Sanders said the country needs more people to vote.

"This is a democracy and we have got to expand that democracy, and I believe every single person does have the right to vote," he said.

Sanders started his answer by pointing out the low rate of voter turnout in the United States when compared to other major democracies around the world. He said one of the primary priorities of his campaign is to make the US a "vibrant" democracy with a much higher voter turnout.

And, Sanders said, enfranchising people like Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- the US citizen who helped bomb the Boston Marathon in 2013, killing three and injuring hundreds of others -- is a part of that.

"Yes, even for terrible people, because once you start chipping away and you say, 'Well, that guy committed a terrible crime, not going to let him vote. Well, that person did that. Not going to let that person vote,' you're running down a slippery slope," Sanders said when asked by a student if sex offenders, the Boston Marathon bomber, terrorists and murderers should have voting rights.

He added: "So I believe people commit crimes and they paid the price and they have the right to vote. I believe even if they're in jail they're paying their price to society but that should not take away their inherent American right to participate in our democracy."

Later on Monday, Sen. Kamala Harris in her own CNN town hall said that she is open to allowing currently incarcerated people to vote, giving a noncommittal answer to Sanders' proposal.

"People who are convicted, in prison, like the Boston Marathon bomber, on death row, people who are convicted of sexual assault, they should be able to vote?" asked CNN's Don Lemon.

Harris said, "I think we should have that conversation."

Her answer was vague and left open the possibility that she could eventually not support the plan.

"I agree that the right to vote is one of the very important components of citizenship. And it is something that people should not be stripped of needlessly, which is why I have been a long been an advocate of making sure people formally incarcerated are not denied the right to vote," Harris said. "In some states they're permanently deprived of the right to vote."

South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg unequivocally said felons should not be allowed to vote while serving their sentences.

"No," he said during his CNN town hall Monday. "I do believe that when you are, when you have served your sentence, then part of being restored to society is that you are part of the political life of this nation again and one of the things that needs to be restored is your right to vote."

He went on to say losing the right to vote is part of the punishment when someone is convicted of a crime.

"You lose your freedom and I think during that freedom it does not make sense to have an exception for it the right to vote," Buttigieg said.

This story has been updated.




CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
24 Apr 2019, 11:49
#40
24 Apr 2019, 11:49#40

Seems the only input, thus far from Cuomo, on Bernie's view was his, Cuomo's, remark during the town hall. Cuomo was the presenter of the town hall.


— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes