FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  @ButtPlug Deep Mind - The original inventors of the

@ButtPlug Deep Mind - The original inventors of the

Started by sharkbok7 REPLIES2,259 VIEWS· 02 Feb 2024, 10:14
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SH
sharkbokCaptain23,196 posts
02 Feb 2024, 10:14
#1
02 Feb 2024, 10:14#1

DeepMind, a UK-based company, authored a research paper on generative AI approximately a decade ago. This pioneering work not only inspired Google to acquire DeepMind but also contributed to the formation of OpenAI. Google likely perceived DeepMind as a potential rival to its search engine and may have sought to suppress the technology.

Fast forward to the end of 2022, and ChatGPT was unveiled to the public as the user interface for OpenAI, marking a departure from its previous strategy of indirectly licensing its technology to software manufacturers.

Microsoft has since been developing generative search as a means to signal and compete with Google's content. Modern search engines utilize hundreds of signals to rank content, a significant evolution from Google's original method, which relied solely on the number of websites linking to each site to determine its ranking.

Google's founders anticipated that other search engines might decipher their methodology or that spammers could manipulate the system with artificial backlinks. Consequently, they considered selling Google but ultimately decided against acquisition.

The acquisition of a small company named Urchin, now known as Google Analytics, was a pivotal move for Google. By implementing a tracking code on nearly every website globally, Google could gain deeper insights into user engagement with content, which then became a crucial signal for content ranking. However, despite many search engines being able to rank content using numerous signals, they lack access to the most vital one: engagement with content.

Furthermore, this tracking script enabled Google to monitor users' internet browsing habits, significantly enhancing its advertising system's competitive edge in display advertising. This strategy was subsequently adopted by Facebook, which emerged as the world's second-largest advertising company.

Google then acquired a Display advertising company, and YouTube allowing them to monetise people's personal data to a greater extent.

Google then went on to make more acquisitions than any other country in history, who knows how many technologies have been suppressed?

As new privacy laws are applied, this could limit Google's tracking ability- its key differentiation as a Search engine.
If generative Search becomes the main signal or one of the main ones, it could make the Search engine market more competitive.

As we move into 2023, DeepMind's employees have observed the success of ChatGPT and reflected on what might have been had they pursued an independent path. The primary founder of DeepMind publicly expressed a desire for greater autonomy from Google. Subsequently, Google disbanded its own AI department (Google Brain) and granted DeepMind increased authority. Additionally, Google invested in an external AI company to operate with more independence.

Recently, it was announced that some DeepMind personnel are leaving to establish their own venture. Reportedly backed by hundreds of millions in investment funding, there is speculation about founding the company in France, positioning it as a competitor to ChatGPT and Google.

In conclusion, monopolies or/and anti-competitive practices tend to hinder progress. They focus more on preserving market share than on innovating and adding value, deviating from their original purpose

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
02 Feb 2024, 10:22
#2
02 Feb 2024, 10:22#2
Deep mind could easily have persevered and followed through on their idea. We're pretending they had all the conviction in the world, when we don't that to be the case. Anyway, AI will be a little different. There are already a bunch of different ones that provide features that GPT and Bard don't. And what happens is most new developers don't have the capital to fully realise their ideas within a competitive timeframe. So they're left selling their companies to bigger ones that have the funding to bring the idea to market. That's normal capitalism. Working as it should.
SH
sharkbokCaptain23,196 posts
02 Feb 2024, 10:36
#3
02 Feb 2024, 10:36#3

Well ButtPlug, should "normal" capitalism allow industries to merge as well? Like when everything becomes computerized with AI, automation and robotics.

Without more anti-competitive practises put in place by governments, 4-5 companies will end up owning everything- especially if AI becomes the capitalist means of production - instead of people's labour.

A better world is having strong competition in any industry. (where possible).
That creates more higher paying jobs- and shares the money out more.
It also stops company owners and shareholders from becoming too powerful- and meddling in politics. 

Anti-competitive practices make shareholders happy because they can invest without risk.

The backing by Microsoft has helped Chat GPT compete against Google, however, if Google were never allowed to swallow up so many other companies - and have tracking ability that no other company has- this would not have been the problem in the first place.

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
02 Feb 2024, 18:34
#4
02 Feb 2024, 18:34#4

Skynet, here we come!

SH
sharkbokCaptain23,196 posts
03 Feb 2024, 14:07
#5
03 Feb 2024, 14:07#5

We could see many careers made redundant, or at least the human workforce will be substantially reduced. 
The next 10 years will hit white-collar jobs, while blue-collar jobs will be replaced by many robotics in 10 or so years- maybe less.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
03 Feb 2024, 16:34
#6
03 Feb 2024, 16:34#6

Great to see sharktwit vaguely aware of some dangers regarding a few companies dominating AI. 

However did this dope ever think about the dangers caused by a few people owning the so called MSM. No he didn't. Instead he became a brain washed zombie of the Globalists. Seldom have I seen such a complete slave. 

I wonder if ou Sharktwit will ever understand what has happened to him. 

Skynet is what they desire Draad. Globalist will use AI to gain total control over humanity. Robots etc will eliminate jobs. What to do with these useless eaters. 

Plumster doesn't see the danger of mass surveillance. Social credit scores, control over you bank account, what you can spend on which goods and services, where you can go. What you can say and even think. Surveillance over your communications with others. Forced vaxx and reductions in the food supply etc etc. 

Poor Plumster thinks his crypto currencies can't be shut down etc. 

The WEF desire to reduce the population to 1 billion is nothing to be concerned about etc. 

Plum is an intelligent guy so there is a chance he could wake up. My assessment of him is he is not as profoundly brainwashed as poor sharktwit and Blobbrain. 



PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
03 Feb 2024, 18:45
#7
03 Feb 2024, 18:45#7

"Plumster doesn't see the danger of mass surveillance. Social credit scores, control over you bank account, what you can spend on which goods and services, where you can go. What you can say and even think. Surveillance over your communications with others. Forced vaxx and reductions in the food supply etc etc. 

Poor Plumster thinks his cryptocurrencies can't be shut down etc. "

There's a ton wrong with what you just said there, Beeno. 

Simply tell me what the plan to shut BTC down is...o r how you think it'll be done.


BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
07 Feb 2024, 22:31
#8
07 Feb 2024, 22:31#8

He don't know shit from sugar

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes