There certainly was no immanent threat….but there might have been an imminent one. Did you talk to the CIA before reaching your conclusion?
Good for you Germany . . .
scorpion/frog
Who's the scorpion and who's the frog?... you'd be surprised...more than just one stinger around ...know them by their fruit...
Tell me more
Stav
Oh the US should gets Europe's help in Iran, after they tried to bypass Europe from the Ukraine-Russia negotiations? Karma is a bitch isn't it.
That statement is a lie concocted by the media. There were no by-passing of NATO couintries in the Ukraine negotiations.
We have idiots on other threads making posts about hypothetical Iranian nuclear bombs blowing up New York...mental shit.
Yeah, I can just imagine what your response would have been back in 2001 if someone had told you that a couple of Boeings would take out a few thousand American citizens and also forever change the Manhattan skyline ....
Just like you can't see what is happening on your own doorstep, you also refuse to even try and acknowledge the danger from around the world.
You are are just so incredibly naive and gullible .....
At least I can acknowledge the possible threats coming from around the world, even at the risk of being ridiculed by people like you.......yet it's exactly people like you who laugh off these kind of threats that are the real idiots in the discussion.
I don't follow much of this shit but I do not see how killing so many people is going to make the rest of them your friends.
Surly all he has achieved is to make more religious nutters that are even more willing to blow themselves up to kill more innocent people.
All the world can hope for is the nutters are focused on killing Americans and leave the rest of us out of it.
Surly all he has achieved is to make more religious nutters that are even more willing to blow themselves up to kill more innocent people.
This was always the risk, hence my concern about some big retalitory attack against the USA at some later stage.... not necessarilly nuclear, but something like another 9/11 from splinter cells already within the USA
I would not want an enemy like Iran, who have already been caught with information regarding wanting to create their own nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles ...
So hang on, you wouldn't want an enemy like Iran yet you're applauding a senseless attack on Iran?
That doesn't make sense.
Btw, while this incredibly stupid and short-sighted war is happening, your hero is busy boasting how he's going to "take" Cuba.
". . . let's see how it looks in a few months."
Why?
A tragedy is unfolding right now, fueled by Trump's lies and his confusing, pathetic commentary.
“Help is on the way” and “Take back your country” were utter bullshit. I hope the Iranians paid no attention to him; those who did would be facing the full brutality of the regime.
The so-called plan was to bomb Iran to dust, but it hasn’t worked. There was no strategy to secure the Strait of Hormuz, nor any consideration for adding another layer of protection with one or two minesweepers.
Calling for help from other nations is an admission of failure.
Iran already wants to destroy America.. they've been yelling "Death to America" for decades...they've been behind most terror groups around the world ...they even fund the fcn ANC....they're not the victims here...they are a rogue terrorist regime who've been tolerated for much too long.
They've been behind Oct 7 and many more terror attacks throughout the ME... terrorizing the region...enough.
There are plenty MAGA lunatics in America who want nothing more than death to Islam.
The 9/11 attack and other isolated terror attacks - while tragic - are small fry compared to the devastation that the USA has wreaked on Iran and other Middle East countries over the last few decades.
Your point is completely lost on me.
Fair enough...I totally get that. I'd rather the USA did not get involved in the ME at all, but I don't think that's gonna happen in my lifetime... unfortunately...there are too many duel citizens, powerful business and interest groups with an vested interest in supporting Israel...if there was a deal to be made, it's long past that ...radical Islam is not interested in that...only total world conquest...since the middle ages.. it's not ever gonna change.
So hang on, you wouldn't want an enemy like Iran yet you're applauding a senseless attack on Iran?
That doesn't make sense.
I don't see any inconsistencies .... applauding disproportionate or poorly planned actions by Trump isn't required or needed at all, to recognize Iran as a major continuous ongoing world problem here.
I can still want the Iranian regime either weakend or taken out completely and still criticise any reckless execution of those actions to do that.... that could inevitably make things worse in the long term, whilst also acknowledging that I am also now making a very dangerous enemy for myself, which by choice I would'nt want, even if that choice was to start the war to begin with.
So yes, who in their right mind would ever want to make an enemy of someone who has constantly said "Death to your existence" .... whilst quietly also previously looking at ways to nuclear armament, whilst bullshitiing the rest of the world... but tough choices need to be made.
The 9/11 attack and other isolated terror attacks - while tragic - are small fry compared to the devastation that the USA has wreaked on Iran and other Middle East countries over the last few decades.
Very valid point that I agree with
The Pentagon's estimate for Iran having a nuclear warhead before this war started was the year 2035.
That is a fact.
All this talk of nukes and enrichment should be seen in that context . . . unless you know of a better source than the Penatagon of course in which case, put up the link.
Also, let's not forget that Bozo boasted after Midnight Hammer that he had obliterated Iran's nuclear capability so if you guys want to keep banging on about Iran's nuclear threat being the reason for Operation Epic Fail, that's fine, believe that if you prefer but at least have the common sense and the common decency to admit that Bozo lied back in June 2025 when he claimed that had been resolved.
? Established facts:
- Iran has hundreds of kilograms of 60% enriched uranium
- That is very close to weapons-grade
Key takeaway
The concern is not that Iran already has weapons-grade uranium —
it’s that it is now very close to being able to produce it quickly if it chooses to
Are you saying the Pentagon has got this wrong . . . by about 8 years?
They have been wrong before eg that Iraq had WMD. But all I’m saying is they have a lot of enriched Uranium. And even if the Pentagon is right, how soon before they potentially have a weapon do we act, 8 years, 5 years, 3 years? All they need is 8 years and a do nothing President like Obama with 2 terms for that to be a reality.
So to summarise, you believe Bozo started this war to save the Iranian people from a terrible government and to prevent a nuclear war that might happen in 8 years time?
Is that a fair summary?
Ummmm . . . what has Bozo ever shown in his nature that makes you think he is this caring, generous and carefully proactive gift to mankind?
I think you're delusional but go ahead and tell me what makes you think Bozo is this admirable phalanthropic saviour of the world.
More from Mikes Gripes
- Mikes GripesStraits closed again . . .115 REPLIES · 836 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesTrump raked in more than $1bn from crypto businesses in 202517 REPLIES · 185 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesDavid Kramer13 REPLIES · 133 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesThe Dems have found7 REPLIES · 77 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesIs the new website live?4 REPLIES · 26 VIEWS
- Mikes GripesSo the ‘disaster’ that is Brexit27 REPLIES · 153 VIEWS