Is Trump guilty of High Treason iro the Syria Issue?

The DP press claims he is guilty of High Treason because h did not act against Turkey - a NATO member trying to defend itself against terrorism on the part of elements within the Kurdish community years ago declared a terrorist organization by the us Government.   

Then also by allowing the Syrian Army to take over the control of the countries border - he is putting the Russians in control of fighting ISIS and abandoning the fight against ISIS.

Fighting between various Muslim sects have been going ion for a thousand years and more and there is no angels and no devils in those battles.   In the case of Turkey there are a terrorist organization that through bomb attacks killed thousands  of ordinary people in Turkey - yet the Kurds are regarded by some as "angels" because they fought against ISIS with the Americans.  The answer is simple - they did not fight against ISIS for any other reason than to protect their own interests.

The same can be said about any other constant wars in the Middle East - irrespective of which side you are on in the ME scenario you will end up on the wrong side.   You will find very little involvement other than arming the Syrian Government and some groups to basically fight in the Syrian Civil War and bombing raids from the air,  Russia's only interest really is  because a large percentage of ISIS leaders and members are form Chezniah - who has been in rebellion for years and launched huge terrorist operations even in Moscow.  The Russians are wise - they have learnt a bitter lesson in Afghanistan and their army involvement in Syria is in fact minimal compared to the involvement of EU countries and the USA in the mess, so why is Trumps actions benefitting the Russians????

The USA used to support the Iraq regime for years in the 1980's when Iraq was in a war against Iran.  When that war ended and Hussein attacked Kuwait the USA turned on Iraq and that ended up in two wars against Hussein for the benefit of whom?   Believe it or not - in ended in benefitting Iran and the creation of iSIS?   How did that benefit the USA?   It just cause havoc which ultimately caused further involvement of the USA in Iraq and Syria.

Maybe the warmongering DP and the USA Arms Industry are the only ones benefitting financially from the chaos in the ME.   The ordinary citizens in the USA are the only losers.  Like the Russians in Afghanistan - the USA should get out of the ME  and if countries get out of control launch a few missiles and air attacks when warranted to do so.  

This is NOT treason in my book and the warmongers are the real treasonous buggers in this case.   Am I wrong in feeling that way?              

I think that is rather a shallow response,  There are no way that involvement in the Muslim sectoral wars in the ME can ever be justified.   All that happened is that it leads to huge losses of life in the case of outsiders involved.  

Best advice get out and stay out of that unstable region .

Just give a reason for your statement about me being always wrong please?      

You are wrong in blaming the democrats. Regardless of whether the Republicans or Democrats are running the US, America is always involved in oil wars and happy to sell weapons to both sides. 

America should not be involved in these wars, and the spineless UN should grow a pair and tell the US to mind its own business.

The US is the largest arms manufacturer in the world, and this benefits all of the US citizens as it grows their economy. Without war, the US economy would shrink. 

No Rooinek

Why I am against the Democrats - because they have stolen the people blind.  The Chinese bribed Biden with a bribe of $1,5 billion to get the China-USA trade deal signed by Obama - which resulted in huge job losses in the USA and exporting of the company plants to China.  Who benefited from the bribe?  Nobody knows because Obama made sure the matter is not investigated by the FBI and CIA by appointing top management in both bodies that will stop the investigation.

The USA sold Russia 20% of the USA strategic uranium  reserve and in exchange an amount of $142 million was paid to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians. The FBI started an investigation and they suddenly stopped the investigation on orders from above.

Obama, Biden, Kerry, Podesta (Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign manager and an Obama White House official who got 75 000 shares in a Russian Company) and Pelosi were all involved in the rampant corruption in the USA.   Easy - do a Zuma and stop any investigation by putting agents in charge of the FBI and CIA.

Duplicate

SB

Did I say it was only DP presidents who started wars - I was wrong.    So lets go through the last century  major Wars:-

*   World War 1  -  Wilson   -   DP

*   World War 2  -  Roosevelt  - DP

*   Korean War   -  Truman   -   DP

*   Vietnam War -   Johnson  -   DP

*   Iraq 1            -   Bush (sen) - RP

*   Afghanistan  -   Bush (jun)  - RP

*   Iraq 2            -   Bush (jun) -  RP

*   Other ME     -   Obama       - DP

The Bush's were part of the Washington establishment in league with the DP and had very little in common with the mainstream RP of today.   The younger B ush is now hobnobbing with the Obamas more than with the RP people.

However, the count remains 5 DP and 2 RP.  

Mike good luck trying to talk any sense into the boards to idiots - rooibozo and sharktwit are the boards two clowns, complete buffoons.

They are as thick as planks. Hahahahahahaha thanks for the merriment  provided planks. 

List of US Wars.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States

From what I can see the US is in continual wars since World War 2

You left out some wars - like the Korea on started by Truman in 1948   

Anyway  why are they involved in wars - basically because of the US armaments industry and the corruption involved in the party political establishments.   

The Vietnam War started in small scale in 1964 and by 1966 it was in full swing - Nixon ended it eventually.  Johnson was one of the most corrupt presidents ever had before Obama took over that title.

The gulf war was in 1991 and not in 1981.  Reagan had nothing to do with it.    

Nixon's impeachment had mothing to do with the Vietnam War - it had to do with the Watergate scandal.

Where the hell did you get that info from????????????

The following quotes from Wikipedia

Korea War 

The war began on 25 June 1950 when North Korea invaded South Korea following a series of clashes along the border. -  President  Truman

Vietnam War

U.S. involvement escalated under President John F. Kennedy through the MAAG program from just under a thousand in 1959 to 16,000 in 1963.[70][71] By 1963, the North Vietnamese had sent 40,000 soldiers to fight in South Vietnam.

By 1964, there were 23,000 US advisors in South Vietnam. In August, the Gulf of Tonkin incident occurred, in which a U.S. destroyer was alleged to have clashed with North Vietnamese fast attack craft. in response, the U.S Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, giving President Lyndon B. Johnson broad authorization to increase U.S. military presence. He ordered the deployment of combat units for the first time and increased troop levels to 184,000.

Do you see any involvement of NIXON there he became President in 1969 with a promise that he would end the War. 

"U.S. president Richard Nixon began troop withdrawals in 1969. His plan, called the Nixon Doctrine, was to build up the ARVN so that it could take over the defense of South Vietnam."

Negotiations in Paris conducted by Henry Kissinger reached a secret agreement in 1972.  Fact is Nixon was NOT a warmonger - he tried desperately to get the USA out of Vietnam.

The Gulf War

The Gulf War (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991), codenamed Operation Desert Shield (2 August 1990 – 17 January 1991) for operations leading to the buildup of troops and defense of Saudi Arabia and Operation Desert Storm (17 January 1991 – 28 February 1991)     

You are ten yuears out on that one,   

I quoted for you what happened after you got virtually everything wrong,