FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / MIKES GRIPES /  Now this could become interesting...

Now this could become interesting...

Started by Ceradyne23 REPLIES677 VIEWS· 06 Jun 2020, 21:27
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
06 Jun 2020, 21:27
#1
06 Jun 2020, 21:27#1

Catherine Herridge has been doing a deep dive and tweeted this out:


“  READ: The UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) is the legal foundation for the military justice system and lists offenses.  +100 Articles. Article 2 and Article 88 posted here #MyHighlighter“



Makes one wonder which military personnel could have put themselves in the line of fire. Vindman? Mattis? Kelly? McMaster? Who knows?

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
07 Jun 2020, 01:18
#2
07 Jun 2020, 01:18#2

Mattis  is is the moron who was on the Board of  Theranos, the fake blood testing company....along with other hasbeens like Sam Nunn,  George Schultz  and the ancient Henry Kissinger . But at least those others are long out to pasture. They were all totally fooled by a fantasizing 35 year old woman.

These generals like Mattis never want to withdraw from anything especially Afghanistan....that’s his real beef withTrump. Bring the troops home.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
07 Jun 2020, 08:00
#3
07 Jun 2020, 08:00#3

“ These generals like Mattis never want to withdraw from anything especially Afghanistan....that’s his real beef withTrump. Bring the troops home. “

Yes. The majority of the career politicians are in cahoots with the industrial military complex. From both sides of the aisle. Trump’s military spending was not the kind they like. His is capital investment in military infrastructure. 

They want wars. That’s where the big money is. Every ICBM launched, every round fired, every shell fired, every hand grenade thrown, etc has to be replaced. That’s the kind of military spending they like. 

Bringing troops home, stops that spending. 

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
07 Jun 2020, 12:29
#4
07 Jun 2020, 12:29#4

What I am deeply thankful about is all the Deep State moles are giving themselves away one by one.

Let's hopes America saves itself from the Marxist/Globalists by delivering a resounding victory to Trump in November.

Interesting to note only 16% support defunding the police. The rest of America is pretty much horrified by the idea. 

AJ
AJHPro3,183 posts
07 Jun 2020, 18:23
#5
07 Jun 2020, 18:23#5

In my opinion all this anti-Trump action once he was declared the Republican Presidential nominee is nothing but treason.

It was an attempt to overthrow a duly elected President of the USA and should be called what it is TREASON.

It should be declared as such and a military court should be set up to judge these individuals involved and dealt with as per military justice when convicted.


READY....AIM......FIRE. 

While they are about it George Soros should also get the treatment he deserves.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
07 Jun 2020, 20:23
#6
07 Jun 2020, 20:23#6

AJH, unfortunately under the US Constitution, treason becomes a bit complicated. It basically boils down to the USA having to be in a state of war, in order for someone to be charged for and found guilty of treason.

I guess, if they really stretch it, there may be a case to be made. Particularly in view of everything that has recently been revealed.

In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason.[1] It was defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, "adhering to the enemies" of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2]Fewer than thirty people have ever been charged with treason under these laws.[3]


CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
07 Jun 2020, 20:23
#7
07 Jun 2020, 20:23#7

AJH, unfortunately under the US Constitution, treason becomes a bit complicated. It basically boils down to the USA having to be in a state of war, in order for someone to be charged for and found guilty of treason.

I guess, if they really stretch it, there may be a case to be made. Particularly in view of everything that has recently been revealed.

In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason.[1] It was defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, "adhering to the enemies" of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2]Fewer than thirty people have ever been charged with treason under these laws.[3]

I suppose one could consider subversion. I haven’t yet checked on how that is dealt with in the US Constitution. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
08 Jun 2020, 08:02
#8
08 Jun 2020, 08:02#8

One can understand why they(MIC) are so pissed.

Trump dropped and an eight year spanner into their works.

The way that I found out Hillary would be the Dem's candidate was hyper strange. I won't share it here because the story is quite unbelievable. 

Suffice to say that it was in 2013 and it made me immediately suspicious.


RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Jun 2020, 08:10
#9
08 Jun 2020, 08:10#9

"I won't share it here because the story is quite unbelievable. "

That's never stopped you before, Plumchum.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
08 Jun 2020, 10:12
#10
08 Jun 2020, 10:12#10

Ja, Rooi. I would never believe this story were I to hear it so I don't expect you or anyone else to.

But since you're obviously interested. Take it or leave it.

Was on a break at a guest lodge. During the day we went on a paid tour which ended at a river where we made a fire. There were about nine people on the tour, one was a yank.

Chatted to the guy and he mentioned that he worked for the US government. I can't remember which department he mentioned because at the time I was only making conversation and wasn't too interested in what he was talking about. What I do know is that it was one of CIA, FBI...or another of similar scale. I remember being slightly taken aback when he mentioned it and wondering what the hell he was doing at a lodge in the middle of nowhere SA. The guy was in his mid-fifties or thereabouts.

The conversation moved to US politics. 

At some point, he said, "Hilary will be the next US president." And he seemed really confident with this smirk type smile on his face. It stood out because he didn't come across as assertive up to then. However, when he said that he was suddenly just too confident. Almost like he wanted me to pay attention. It may be false memory but I'm convinced that he also spoke slower and looked at me more directly when he said that. 

Basically, I'm recalling a conversation that I wasn't paying much attention too and which only became relevant about a year later.

Keep in mind this was in 2013. At the time I don't think Hilary had been spoken about as a candidate much. I hadn't read or heard about her running in 2016 at that stage. 

It must have been a good year after that when I next heard Hillary was running. 

I immediately remembered that guy.

As I said, unbelievable. Perhaps not so strange either. 





RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Jun 2020, 10:16
#11
08 Jun 2020, 10:16#11

Huh?

What is so "unbelievable" about that anecdote?

The only bit I'm struggling to believe is that someone wanted to chat with you . . . but I'm guessing he hadn't got to know you yet.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
08 Jun 2020, 10:22
#12
08 Jun 2020, 10:22#12

“ Posted by: Rooinek (10427 posts)

Jun 08, 2020, 10:16

Huh?

What is so "unbelievable" about that anecdote?

The only bit I'm struggling to believe is that someone wanted to chat with you . . . but I'm guessing he hadn't got to know you yet. “

Hahaha. The irony. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
08 Jun 2020, 10:28
#13
08 Jun 2020, 10:28#13

 "Hahaha. The irony."

Exactly



RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Jun 2020, 10:45
#14
08 Jun 2020, 10:45#14

Predictably, not the most original comebacks from our dull-witted Trumpanzees . . . the usual "we're not unpleasant, you're unpleasant" or "one finger pointed at us and three back at you" type of responses.

Are you little chaps even capable of banter or repartee without resorting to the "back to you but double" type of insults that most of us last saw or heard when we were in primary school?

PS I still have no idea what is so "unbelievable" about someone saying in 2013 that Hillary might be the Democrat candidate for the 2016 election.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
08 Jun 2020, 10:56
#15
08 Jun 2020, 10:56#15

Hey, you wanna know a more trippy one...Rooi?

Something I saw in 2001, just after 9/11?

I was shaving my head over a tiled counter.

When I was almost done, I noticed that the shaved hair had formed a picture as it fell. The image was so perfect, in both scale and clarity that I actually went to fetch a roommate of mine to come and look. We stood there for about 10 minutes looking at it. We also took photos because it was too strange and we wanted proof. 

We actually tested it. We showed the pictures to people without telling them what we thought it was. Most people said it was an artist drawing and saw exactly what we saw. 

There were three figures in the picture. 

So what was the picture of? 

On the left was a small muscular person with this singular horn(long straight spike) coming out of the front of his head. He was standing with his arms back and looking up as though rising to a challenge. 

In front of him, looking down at him was a creature that was about twice his height and made from rock. If ever you've seen the Fantastic 4...this second figure looked like The Thing. Big rounded shoulders and thick legs with huge feet. 

The third figure was a man in an Arabic robe and headdress. This figure had his hands on the back of the rock man's shoulders and his right foot on the rock man's back. Like he was pushing him forward. 

You would have to see the image to understand just how weird and perfect it was.

My interpretation of that, at the time, was as follows.

The small stout guy was western society. His horn and posture being our ability and willingness to fight for our survival/freedom. He seemed more powerful than his size suggested.

The rock man was a military-industrial complex type combination of states, militaries, arms manufacturers and media agencies. Basically the weapon's the free world had built to protect itself.

The Arabic figure was a Middle Eastern influence(government, religion or movement) that was forcing the free world's infrastructure back on itself.

How's that for peculiar hahaha

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
08 Jun 2020, 10:58
#16
08 Jun 2020, 10:58#16

No Rooi, he never said candidate. He said  president.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
08 Jun 2020, 11:06
#17
08 Jun 2020, 11:06#17

Ok. Unsurprisingly, Poepol clearly missed it. Let’s try for the last time. I’ll narrow it down so you, hopefully, won’t get distracted by the rest of the clutter. 

“ someone wanted to chat with you “

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Jun 2020, 11:11
#18
08 Jun 2020, 11:11#18

Poor Cowardunce . . . there's a puddle of drool forming on the desk under his chin as a result of his brain overheating and yet he still hasn't worked out that he's been whoosh ed.

Painful to watch.

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Jun 2020, 11:19
#19
08 Jun 2020, 11:19#19

Wow Plumchum, that is incredible! No, I mean really incredible!

You see, just this morning I spilt some shaving cream and it splatted in the weirdest shape. It was the shape of what looked like two Trumpanzees staring vacantly at each other as they tried to think of a clever or witty retort while their brains were inside a washing machine in the background that had a detergent box marked "alt-right kool-aid".

Weird, huh? And on the same day as your incredible story about the fantastic 4 figures. Unbelievable coincidence!

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
08 Jun 2020, 11:29
#20
08 Jun 2020, 11:29#20

 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
08 Jun 2020, 12:01
#21
08 Jun 2020, 12:01#21

As I suspected. That was obviously above ou Rooies’ pay grade. Now go back to sharpening your pencils and counting your paper clips. 

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
08 Jun 2020, 12:19
#22
08 Jun 2020, 12:19#22

My pay grade, Cowar dunce? 

Hmmmm . . . whatever my pay grade is, I do know that what I earn in a month is more than what a SADF Permanent Force Staff Sergeant (or whatever the heck you were in the SADF) earns in a year.

I'm aware that you now do security installations in the UK since you tucked tail and ran away from South Africa with your apartheid loot, but I wouldn't think that installing beams or putting up barbed wire fences has significantly changed your pay grade.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
08 Jun 2020, 12:26
#23
08 Jun 2020, 12:26#23

Draad, that picture of the face in the clouds doesn't come close to the clarity of what I described.

I wish I still had that those photos. Unfortunately, it was before the days of phone cameras and FB.

Rooi, please know, I don't come here to outwit you daily. It happens as a matter of course. 



CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
08 Jun 2020, 12:27
#24
08 Jun 2020, 12:27#24

If only you knew. Beams and barbed wire fences. Hahaha. 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Mikes Gripes