Question to all

Since everyone is asking some valid and difficult questions about this war, some of them pertaining to the reality of what could still happen in this Iran war, and some very hypothetical scenarios about this war... from both sides....... let me ask you all the same highly hypothetical question.

If the USA had 100% unquestionable and irrefutable inside confirmation 5 years from now, that Iran not only had enriched uranium, but actually had an underground nuclear missile silo that was capable of sending out 4 nuclear armed ballistic missiles that could reach Israel or the USA at any time..

Would you and could you make the decision, to send down mutiple large ordinance ballistic missiles on to that site, to destroy Iran's capability of using those missiles for offensive reasons.....knowing full well that thousands of men, women and children were peacefully protesting outside the gates of that same nuclear facility, as a deterence for getting it destroyed.

Keep in mind, at this stage, Iran has not used any of these missiles, but confirmation has been made that they do definitely exist.

A Yes or No answer ..... could you and would you, order the strike.

No.

Yes.

No.

I do not want an Iran with a nuke, nor do I want a North Korea, or a Russia - and now America as well

However if I was an Iranian, I would want a nuke- especially given what has happened.

The Obama deal was good. It was working.

Trump messed it up. Iran started building a nuke - and now they will certainly get a nuke.

America are not a moral authority that decides who gets nukes. America is causing more global war and economic problems than all other countries put together

--

America remains the only country that has ever nuked another country. Who are they to decide who gets one or not?

As for North Korea, we already have one madman with a nuke and thankfully he hasn't used it yet. Bozo would never dare attack North Korea so - despie all the anti-Islamic outrage we see on this board - I don't see Iran being so different and I can understand why they want one.

The OP is a cesspool of non sense.Before answering any question, first step is to ensure the question means something.

On this board, liberals in their never ending disputes are split in several factions over Russia, among them, one believing that russia does not bluff when they say they will use nukes, another that believes russia does bluff.

What is about? Bombing a nuclear Iran? It is so unclear.

And as usual with liberals, it does not end here; From what faction does this question come from? The one that thinks russia bluffs and will not use nukes or the one that thinks that russia will use nukes? Yes, peeps...

Liberals and their total absence of universality... When liberals think that russia will use their nukes, what makes them think iran will not use their nukes in similar conditions?

"As for North Korea, we already have one madman with a nuke and thankfully he hasn't used it yet. Bozo would never dare attack North Korea so - despie all the anti-Islamic outrage we see on this board - I don't see Iran being so different and I can understand why they want one."

Maybe you should read their good book...they explain things quite clearly...

No

No what?

Well, if you scroll to the original thread you'll find that the scribe is asking for a Yes or No answer.

Get it?

It will help if you took the time to read through before you pedal your auto defensive mindset.

The auto defensive mindset comes from living in a harsh environment for like ever.

Be gentle on yourself.....get some sleep.

"Maybe you should read their good book...they explain things quite clearly..."

Not sure if you're talking about North Korea's "good book" or Iran's, but if you're talking about the Koran then most of it is the same as your "good book" . . . just a few name changes like Ibrahim instead of Abraham, Jibril instead of Gabriel, Ismail instead of Ishmael, Yusuf instead of Joseph, Suleiman instead of Solomon, Musa instead of Moses etc etc.

Is the OP about bombing a nuclear weaponised Iran or not? It is unclear.

Yet not a detail.

SB

The Obama deal was good. It was working.

Wonderful; to live in Cloud Cuckoo Lnd - the deal was nor working in reality - bar for increease in correuption. In 2 years the Ayatollah Regime enriched more uranium than they did in the preceeding 20 years.

All the Iranins did was to move the enriching to what hey call army camps not subject o inspection. The news reached the USA quickl;y and Comngress never ratfued the Deal because of that.

In a hated and unpopular dictatorship leaking of info was the norm and aside from that with satellite spying things are not kept secret for long, So in 2018 Trump tried to force Iran to negotiate in good faith - but they refuseed to reduce uranium enrichment, So sine he poil trade wrldwide is done in dolalrs since 1977 - Congress passed a law in 2018 freezing effectively all dollars ued to pay Iran for oil exports,

Tha situation lasted until Biden took over the presidency, The Autopen was corrupt to the core and Biden or the Autopen regularly unfrozed dollars for Iran - and that was used to fund terrorism worldwide and enhance the enrchment of Uranium program. An amount of $480 billion was involved but millions were connected to Autopen corruption.

In September 2023 Kerry went to Teheran to make a deal with the A yatollah Regime The Ayatollah Regime would spend millions on advertisng and getting reaction ary mullahs in the USA to get Muslim support for Boden's re-election. In return the Boden Presidency would effecgtively unfroze all dxollars.

That was comparable to what the D emocratslyingly claimed Trump did in the 2016 election. With the Demorats they do everything what they accuse the Republicans of doing. In 2016 Clinon informed her campaign mnager Podesta in an e-mil that she "has direct access inoto Putin's inner sanctum". She did - since she was corrupt shot and Putin used it.

Sio live on dreaming about Iran's wonderful regime adhering to any treatiies, The played Obama like a puppet on strings with Iran being the puppet masters.

Ou Maaik, does this mean you don't like Democrats very much?

I admire he Dmocrats when Kennedy was President - the probkem was he wa shard on Cuba and other

rogue cuntriesm Kemmedy esas clear - no inteference in Vietnam. Kennedy acted strongly anxd banned all shoppips be stopped and searched, Then Jack Keeennedy was murdered - followed by the murder of his brotherm

After Kennedy's deaath his successors was weak and corrupt , Anybody wantin g an inerview with Johnson had to bring an envelope filled wothh dollars, He was succeded by a crook - that tme a Repblican. The only Demcoratic Party President aftr Kenndy - but he was weak, After that every D Democrtic Party Presidemt was coorrupt. Clinton was vicious whem it come t corruption - but Clinton did not sell put the USA. Obama was worse and his partners in crime were Hilary Clinton and Nideen. Theygpt ntined nu Russia, China and Iran. Bush used lies to start the Iraq war - the 3 Democrats menned used ie to enrich themselves. There are tons of evidence confirming the above,

The fact is that I worked my life long as a Public Servant, I learned to hate corruption and hate it especiallt ibn Goernment on poitical and mana gement level. There were curruption involving Rjbansi - but was rotected by De Klerk. In the end they decided to put me on pension. I had the evidence and a funral would not be the end of the implicaions. In the end Rajbunsi lost hsi job a fter the James C ommission where I gav evidence of corfuption. I became aware of National Party corruption and hated it,

They apped my telephone and followed me whereve I went, In ny event I ws appointed by Balito Municiplaity and for me it was a relieve = the Municipality was rich but no evidence of corruption was in evidence . I workd for the Municipality until 2012. That year I was terminated at the a ge of 60 tearsm When I left the Municiplaity had R500 million to upgade road and othe infratsrucutre in the Municipaitym by 2012 that money vanshed into thin air - no infrastructure upgrade tok place,

I give you the above information to show why I hate Government cirruption - I do not hate the Democratic Party - but since they are despicable, I despise hem.

. .