The Democratic Party is now siding with the Ayatollah

This does not surprise me at all, Their support depends on the amount of the bribes they get fom the Ayatollah Regime. Obama was bribed by the Ayatollah regime and so was Clinton when she was Secretary of State and during the Autopen Presidency,

The situation is really sick with the Ayatollah using terrorists to kill innocent people against against he dictaorship of the A A Ayatollah. It will be extfremelt difficult to follwo the Maduro example and arrest the dictator in his palace, So the solution is to bomb the Ayatolah and his regime leaders by bombing them out of existence,

.

AI Overview .... Oom hulle se jy praat kak. Shame on you.

Based on recent political discourse and polling, the claim that the Democratic Party is "siding with the Ayatollah" is a contentious political characterization rather than a statement of official policy. It is rooted in policy disagreements between Democrats and Republicans regarding the best approach to Iran.

1. Policy Differences: Most Democrats (69% in a Jan 2026 poll) oppose the use of direct U.S. military force to overthrow the Iranian regime, preferring diplomatic, economic, or non-military pressure. This stance is often framed by opponents as weak or accommodating, leading to accusations that it helps the regime.
2. Opposition to Escalation: In early 2026, many Senate Democrats warned against new military strikes on Iran, arguing that Congress must authorize any bombing campaigns.
3. "Own the Ayatollahs" Criticism: Similar accusations arose in 2015 regarding the nuclear deal (JCPOA), with critics arguing that supporting the agreement made Democrats responsible for the regime's regional actions.
4. Context of Opposition: Some Democrats oppose immediate, direct strikes, arguing that such actions could inadvertently strengthen the regime by rallying public support against the U.S..
5. Current Stance: The official, articulated position of Democratic leadership is generally to confront Iran's regional influence and human rights abuses, but to avoid policies that could lead to a broader, direct war.

In summary, Democrats generally advocate for a policy of containment and diplomatic pressure rather than direct, proactive military intervention, a position that critics—particularly Republicans—interpret as a failure to sufficiently confront the Iranian leadership.

1. Many Americans support Iranian protesters but few want U.S. ...
2. 21 Jan 2026 — About half (51%) of Republicans would support the U.S. using military force to overthrow Ayatollah Khamenei, while only 23% oppose...
4. YouGov
5. 
   
7. Most Senate Democrats warn Trump against Iran strike
8. 14 Jan 2026 — Some Republicans, such as Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.), are also cautioning against military strikes on Iran, warning they might swing pop...
9. 
   
11. The Hill·Alexander Bolton
12. 
    
13. 1:16
14. 
    
15. The DNC's bumbling anti-American new chairman - NY Post
16. 12 Jan 2026 — Consider, for example, the comments of Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), who this weekend identified the 1953 ouster of Iranian prime mini...
18. New York Post
19. 
    

Show all

Dive deeper in AI Mode

A I reporfts are fed in by the media and is about as accurate as your bible The Guardian is, Enough lies o fill the umiverse fpr the next decade. For instance the diea that a targetted air attack to kill f the Ayatollah would have he support of 80% of the Iran population - but a fiull scale ground war is a differet matter,

There a re numeous examples of where Obama, Clinton and Biden got bribnes from Iran, Russia and China - but AI is not reporting those because it is not reported by te fake media for inclusion.in AI

.