Please go to the following thread and you will learn a lot about why SA is going backward fast:-
https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2019-03-05-i-wasnt-raised-to-remain-silent-says-student-who-picked-up-eff-rubbish/
It is a tragedy but barbarism in some people is bubbling over regularly,
So here is the EFF comments on the incident:-
"The EFF at the University of the Free State (UFS) has called the student who seemed unfazed as he tried to dispose of rubbish in a bin, only for two women wearing EFF T-shirts to throw it out, as a “white boy” trying to impress the “white cabal”.
“The acts of white boy that is seen in the circulating video were never as a result of being forced to pick up the dirt as some speculate, but were rather motivated by his passion to silence the voices of poor black parents trying to express their frustration,” EFF UFS student command chairperson Siphokazi Tyida and secretary Jerry Thoka said in a joint statement on Tuesday.
“What the white boy did was an attempt to normalise the state at the Thakaneng bridge and silence the protestors, deeming the black protestors as stupid and worthless to impress the white cabal that continuously engage in racist mechanism to silence black workers and students.”
This is typical of those confused barbarians. No decency at all - the polluters should in fact be fired if they are employed by anybody. If this is not hate speech against the Whites I wonder what it is?
Wish an organization would take up the matter with the HRC and hit the EFF hard, They are using White hate speech as a election campaign approach and it is tragic that SA has barbarians like that being allowed to cause havoc in the country. In any event it would cause a major outcry when the video is circulated in Europe and the USA - and it would.
So here is the EFF comments on the incident:-
"The EFF at the University of the Free State (UFS) has called the student who seemed unfazed as he tried to dispose of rubbish in a bin, only for two women wearing EFF T-shirts to throw it out, as a “white boy” trying to impress the “white cabal”.
“The acts of white boy that is seen in the circulating video were never as a result of being forced to pick up the dirt as some speculate, but were rather motivated by his passion to silence the voices of poor black parents trying to express their frustration,” EFF UFS student command chairperson Siphokazi Tyida and secretary Jerry Thoka said in a joint statement on Tuesday.
“What the white boy did was an attempt to normalise the state at the Thakaneng bridge and silence the protestors, deeming the black protestors as stupid and worthless to impress the white cabal that continuously engage in racist mechanism to silence black workers and students.”
This is typical of those confused barbarians. No decency at all - the polluters should in fact be fired if they are employed by anybody. If this is not hate speech against the Whites I wonder what it is?
Wish an organization would take up the matter with the HRC and hit the EFF hard, They are using White hate speech as a election campaign approach and it is tragic that SA has barbarians like that being allowed to cause havoc in the country. In any event it would cause a major outcry when the video is circulated in Europe and the USA - and it would.
Sssshhhhsss!!!
Draad
There is one thing that the EEF gangster said that is 100% true - "the black protestors are stupid and worthless".
Black people that embrace modern democratic values are welcome in Britain, as are all other new immigrants.
However, any black person that wants to enforce racial biasis is not welcome.
Johannesburg - A South African trade union with mostly white members went to court on Wednesday to challenge the country's policy of racial quotas for national sporting teams.
The government has instituted a transformation charter which compels national squads to implement racial quotas -- especially in high-profile white-dominated sports such as rugby and cricket.
But the Solidarity trade union opposes the transformation policy and went to the Johannesburg Labour Court to have it overturned.
"Our focus is to remove specific provisions of the transformation charter... which specifically relate to the adoption of quotas," Werner Human, Solidarity's legal expert, told AFP.
"Quota, we contend, is against the provision of the constitution, (and) is strictly against the employment (laws)."
"Ultimately we would wish to have a sporting environment which is more depoliticised (and) focus can truly be on talent," he said.
The court will decide at a future date whether the union -- which is mainly made up of white Afrikaans speakers -- can bring its case.
If permission is granted, only then will the merits be discussed.
During apartheid, blacks were barred from national teams.
The sports ministry, the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee along with the country's rugby, cricket, netball, athletics unions are opposing the union's application.
The ministry called the action one of "desperation and an attempt to hold back the progress which is currently being achieved", describing the case as "unfortunate".
The Springboks' first black captain Siya Kolisi sparked outrage earlier this year when he said he did not believe the country's iconic former president Nelson Mandela would have backed quotas for the national team.
He said racial imbalances could only be fixed by developing sport from the grassroots.
"I would not want to be picked because of my skin colour because that surely would not be good for the team," he said.
Under the agreement between South African rugby officials and the government, half of the Springboks side at the 2019 Rugby World Cup in Japan should be black.
A quota system for domestic professional rugby and cricket teams was first introduced in 1999 to encourage black participation, but was scrapped in 2007.
In 2011, new quota systems were adopted by sports governing bodies and the government.
Blacks remain under-represented in cricket and rugby, but dominate in football, for which South Africa is ranked 14th on the continent.
SB
This is part of the local judicial issue and fact is the Constitutional Court has in the past ruled that quotas in the employment environment are unconstitutional and consequently illegal on the basis of racial discrimination. The argument will end up as to whether contracted players are or are not in fact employees of the Rugby Franchises and SARU.
That I believe is what the argument will end up to be.- but going through Court process in SA is a long process. The Labour Court is likely to advise the applicant to deal with the matter through the High Court and then the process would start afresh/ From the High Court of Southern Gauteng - the matter will go to the Appeals Court and may then go to the Constitutional Court - the final Court of Appeal in SA.
In rare cases of alleged abuse of the Constitution the Constitutional Court may accept a request directly to deal with the issue, but there is normally a long delay in setting a Court date and it normally takes another three months or more before a judgement is delivered.