SHsharkbok
Captain23,201 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 13:20#45
The answer I provided is consistent with what both calculators delivered.
Notice how I can provide evidence and third-party sources to back up what I say. The people who created these calculators obviously know a lot about maths.
All you have are Qanon that will back you... Brains support my viewpoint, whereas you have monkeys.
SHsharkbok
Captain23,201 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 14:10#49
The calculators prove my sum was correct. Enough said...Any number + 100% doubles the original number. It does not just have to be a base of 1, the original number can be anything.
You never gave your own sum, so can I assume you accept Mozart's as fact? However, now you appear to be saying that my figures are correct. (e.g. that 70% is less than 1). Thanks....
Can you provide a calculator that will confirm that Mozart's number is correct? No you cant...
Science and maths agree with me, but you still have Qanon conspiracies... Without the crutch of religion, your left without a pot to piss in. Qanon is an awakening. It is the dumb religious simpletons starting to realize that the tooth fairy does not exist. Their reality is just one to be ridiculed....
SHsharkbok
Captain23,201 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 15:24#62
Yet my answer is supported by x2 calculators.
If I am right, which both calculators confirm, then any alternative answer is wrong...Any honest and sensible person would concede.
50% +70% = 120 (not 250). That is just more than double the original number.
Show me the calculator to confirm your "maths". (sic)I see you are slowly changing your numbers now that a calculator is involved, but it does not detract from your error.
A bit like the far-right believing centrists is left-wingers...
And yes, Squeaky Toy has proven once again he is a servile gimp. He does not want to think, he just tries to find loose bricks that are removed from context- to try to construct his version of reality...
SHsharkbok
Captain23,201 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 16:06#67
Mozart while your maths was wrong, you at least accept that the people who created the vaccine know more than you- about the science and maths of vaccines. (even if you do not accept the calculators that prove you wrong).
You are a bit like Tucker Carlson. Complain about science all of the time, but you were one of the first ones in the queue to get your shot.
I remember some of your rants on this board about not being able to buy the vaccine to jump to the front of the queue. You hated having to wait behind people older and more at risk than you. No one wanted the vaccine more than you, and you would even be willing to pay a bribe for it.
Other conservatives (the stupid anti-vaxxer ones) like Draad and Beeno will be taken sooner than later by Covid... The US still leads the way for most deaths in the world. Thanks to Trump America became the Kings of Ventilators and Covid.
The world has seen that Americans have some smart Democratic people, but most of the Republicans are not first-world people. It is clearly a country in decline, propped up by Big Tech.
SHsharkbok
Captain23,201 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 21:13#77
Yes, it is surprising that the number of infections could double in 1 week, given over 70% of the population is vaccinated.
Only 50% of all adults have had both vaccines.
It does raise questions about AstraZeneca if people are getting infected so highly- "if" they have had the vaccine already. It seems almost impossible - "if" the vaccine works well.
Number of deaths is the key metric, but reducing cases would be ideal.
SHsharkbok
Captain23,201 posts
SHsharkbokCaptain23,201 posts
03 Jun 2021, 21:23#78
I just got out of the water after surfing. Lovely weather today.
I have provided 2 calculators that show how I worked out the number. If you are not going to accept these, it is your choice.
However while you can have your own opinion, but you can't have your own facts.
The calculators produce the same result I did, albeit they are using different methods for the calculation. I provided a simpler method that is easier to work out in your head without using a calcula tor, but the value is the same.