Tucker gets a $100m 5 year offer

 Ffs. yet another copy/paster

Plum old BlobDrol has severely limited capabilities so you cant expect to much from the loon. He was once a dent poster but now had gone to pot in nz. There maybe some hope for nz though as I hear the governing party will be chucked out. Poor Blobbrain is very gullible and easily mislead. 

Yes many demorats today are wondering about how crazy their party has become. Robert Kennedy has jumped up to 19% as a demorat presidential  candidate already. I expect that to keep growing. Only problem with Kennedy is I hear he supports the man made climate change lunacy. Another Globalist lie that us blowing up in their faces. But you still get the bitter enders like ou StavAss immune from any evidence and logic. 

The sky is the limit for Tucker. I hope he starts his own channel.  That other like Lou Dobbs, Gjtfield, Watters, Hannity and Ingraham etc join him.

NEWSMAX OFFERED HIM  a huge package, more than he got at Fox. In addition they would give him complete control over tgeir news programming. 

It's great that Fox has been once and for all revealed as controlled opposition.

Tucker got 3 million views. That has dropped to 1,3 million. Hope is falls much further. 

Apparently Zelensky was on a phone call with Murdoch. Tucker was calling out the proxy war and surrounding corruption and dangers of nuclear war. Could be the reason he was fired. 

Yes they fired the most popular US news host in history as the Murdocks didn't liKe his Ideological position. Fox will never be the same again. 

Globalists, in recorded history, are the ones who demand submission the most. It is all about submission for them.

They usually deliver stories that are blatantly incorrect and demand people to believe in them.

No simple minded would ever deny that globalists have achieved a society fiction sells well.

They have built a multi billion industry on selling fictions.

Not knowing the valuentertainment company, a quick search shows by their own words they are in storytelling.

Here comes the report about a job offer from a company trading in storytelling to a story teller.

But what. Nothing as usual. Empty.

Time for self patting on the shoulder.

In the other thread, it was pointed out that globalists are unable to face the situation, they must downplay it and dress it in a convenient way.

It is all about the money. They can not face that this guy could not respect the sanctity of one of the core principles, the election process. They can not address the situation from a value perspective (even though they keep claiming about loss of values etc)

They can not.

As it was statedin the other thread, the loss of money was coincidental. Here comes another peddler of tales that consider hiring the storyteller could be profitable.

Nothing. Emptiness. They are unable to condemn the storyteller on the ground he shat on the core tenets of their hallowed civilization. Unable.

Globalists have no inner self. As such, they can not be moral beings.

Wehe, ButtPlug Reading Trad's nonsense and then telling us that he didn't. 

ButtPlug, if it wasn't for your unintended humour, I'd skip past your barely comprehensible rubbish as well.

You and Trad have something in common. You both have very strong feelings and ideas but you are unable to articulate those feelings and ideas in such a way that the average reader has any clue what you're banging on about.

We know you get quite emotional, we just don't know what it is that makes you so emotional.

Trad is always droning on about the globalists. "It is all about submission for them." he says before "It is all about the money. " in the very next post. Make up your mind . . . but back to the point, I suspect his definition of globalist differs markedly to that of our resident fruitcake Baboon-ou. I'd actually be very interested in seeing both Trad and Baboon-ou define "globalist" for us . . . but Trad's response will just be the usual couched, vague and nonsensical garbage while Baboon-ou will flood us with more of the far right propaganda he digs up from the dark little spaces he visits on the internet . . . something you've always condoned by the way until recently when you get all tearful when blob does the same thing . . . although not nearly to the same extent and not nearly to the same levels of lunacy. Surely you have enough self-awareness to recognise the double standards you're applying here. Yes?

You should have a little think about that . . . but you won't. Your response to this will probably be an attempt to make an even bigger dick of yourself than you did on the "does-he-believe-in-evolution" thread. Good luck topping that one!

LMAO!

Rooinek 

It pays when a person talking the truth about news issues and Tucker normally is correct or extremely near the mark when he goes for the liar media our local brainwashed idiots believe in.   

I read Tucker’s text that got him in trouble. In part it was a sort of reflection that he shouldn’t let his baser feelings take over. Unfortunately in the process he revealed his baser feelings….everybody has them, but a public figure can’t reveal them.  

He is toast except for some ultra right wing nutter sites. I know posters on here have an affection for some of these talking heads. But having met a few of them, I can assure you they are mostly an egotistical bunch who  see people on the other side of the microphone as sheep.

Spare no tears for Tucker, he’ll be okay financially. But like Bill O’ Reilly who was actually much more astute, he will be largely irrelevant.

"It is all about submission for them." he says before "It is all about the money. " in the very next post. Make up your mind . .

There is no opposition.

Globalists, or liberals or whatever usually harp upon how the respect of values, the enforcement of principles make their society the greatest success in human history.

Yet when a pundit cheapens a corner stone principle of their revered system (that is the election process), instead of tackling the issue at hand, they prefer to substitute another issue to it: money.

It is all about the money (instead of being all about the value that was stampeded)

And all of the money relation in a coincidental way: this guy made his previous hirer lose money, he got fired, this guy may make a potential storyteller money, he will be hired.

The topic of the value is being swept under the carpet, globalists, liberals being unable to condemn the man on the ground of their hallowed principle. They made it a money issue.

This is how it is all about submission. Globalists act publically, it is plain for all to see that the guy had no concern at all about a supposed value that made their society so great.

It was a blatant assault. Globalist can not retort on this ground. They have to turn it into something else.

They act publically yet demand people to perceive them otherwise, as people who cherish theirs values, as people who abide by their own laws etc

They want to coerce people into accepting what is not.

See a rapist, the person rapes publically, all plain to see. Yet the person still demands to be treated and refered as something else than a rapist. Submission.

People know but as an act of submission, they deny.

The part of this is that it is simple. It does not require to be intelligent to understand and perceive it.

Nobody is fooled by globalists'ways. Globalists could accept themselves as they are, except they are supremacists and therefore demand people to report globalists in other ways.

I'd actually be very interested in seeing both Trad and Baboon-ou define "globalist" for us . . . but Trad's response will just be the usual couched, vague and nonsensical garbage

Usually, words are taken for their conventional meaning, a globalist is a person who adheres to globalism, globalism being the belief that a society secures its future by  looking at global extension.

For example, SA is a product of globalization and goes hand in hand with globalism.

Nothing unconventional. Pointless to make up things as the globalists' ship is already loaded enough.

Plum ou Rooitwit is a very ignorant fellow and gets frightened by people who bursts his little bubbles. 

As for Mozzz having a go at Tucker rated the most popular news host in America history, it's to be expected. Mozzz is a elite Globalist scumbag. I suspected it for some time but always gave him the benefit of any doubt. Not any more.

He is a very devious operator, very pleasant superficially but his type are a danger to humanity. 

Tucker is far from finished. Only concern is can Fox muzzle him until contract ends we will soon find out. 

Tucker had the guts to address topics that were off the table. He kept dismantling the Globalist narratives. 

Tucker rules!...if he took that much flack,  he must have been over the target!!!

Hahahaha….. good to have you back HasBeen-ou

Moz, you normies live in another world than the red-pilled...the world is not what it seems,  but also not as evil as Beenz believe it to be...it's even getting difficult for us fence sitters.

I’m now an apartment dweller, so nope, no gardeners with or without bowler hats. After almost 50 years of worrying about my garden it’s amazingly liberating. If I get an irresistible urge to talk to a plant I’ll get hold of HasBeen or visit the Botanical garden.

Actually I’m rather enjoying my new role as a globalist, left wing scumbat.

Always stunning to read people who hail from countries born out of globalization and who praise them depict themselves as other than globalists or insinuate they are not globalists.

Newsflash: both Joe Biden and Donald Junior Trump are globalists. As both of them are liberals in the political philosophy meaning.

Refering to subdivisions (necessary to meet the requirements of factionalism) like conservative, liberal, democrat, republican, right wing, left wing does not cut.

All of them are liberal by the meaning of political philosophy.

Look at the responses, Trad.

I'm trying to help you save some energy.

...nobody reads any of it.

Another stunner.

From an allegedly non reader.

Best part: since this message is not read, gathering no answer is expected.

Liberals, globalists have nothing in store when asked basic questions.

Sidetracking, deflecting, denying is the name of the game.When they do not switch to contempt through ignorance.

They have nothing in store, they can not answer.

So yeah, no answer. It is expected.

The surprise would be that they could produce an answer.

Cant happen though. Liberals have deep problems of authority, that is how they cling to power.

'm at a loss. It was my understanding that the globalists supported the MMGW story and were mainly libs.

This is becoming more difficult to follow by the day.

No. It is part of the tale.

Globalists, liberals have much in common with the criminal world.

No simpled minded person would ever confuse gangs fighting over drugs as a fight to end drugs trading.

It takes circonvolution from a superior mind to manage mental contorsion to reach another conclusion.

Globalists are fighting among themselves to determine who gets the benefit of globalisation.

Permanent infighting.

Globalists'position only reflect their best interests, Ukraine is another example.

How it is that globalists from SA do not support Ukraine. Ukraine by far is closer to what they loved and regret, the apartheid regime.

"It takes circonvolution from a superior mind to manage mental contorsion to reach another conclusion."

WOW!!!

Tucker had cajones and was not afraid to speak out and tell it like it is. He never fell for the Zelensky and his supporters crap.

Yeah and truth can be stranger than fiction

Substitute! Your lies for fact

Substitute! I see right through your plastic mac

Substitute! I look alright but my bad was crack

But I'm a substitute for another guy

I look pretty small, but my heels are high

Good on Tucker, you are not the loser, Fox News is and so are the Americans.

Voices speaking out in USA are many, these are the people of courage that every country needs...the factory of lies must be exposed for the good of all mankind.

https://youtu.be/pT4Wn7kLxo4

1, 553 × 1,035