Stav
So called?...there is nothing so called about the classified documents, they where 100% classified documents that Trump should not have kept.
A lie as poven before. There were no documets t he archves wanted to have Thy inspected that documents and suggestd trump returned 16 boxes of documents they wanted and Trump sent the boxes back to them. THe FBI knew about it and kne tha Trump has declassify all documents and here were co classified doccuents involved.
The conducted the raid following absolutely bog standard protocol, a raid that could of been completely avoided had he returned all the documents. And its not like they didn't give him time, they had been trying to get the documents back for 18 months. But not only did he not return the documents, he obstructed attempts to get the documents returned.
Another lie Standrad protco was not followed at all. S tandrad proocol was followed in the case of Biden search. He was nofied in advance of the FBI search and his lawyer was present at teh search - the rooms of Biden house wa ageed upon.
The FBI had t bring in saff from Richmond to do the Mar-el-Lago search because their Florida staff wold not artici[te in an illegal search. They also the date when they knew none of the Trump family being at home. So when his attorney was informed of te raid she rushed to Mar-el-Lago where the F NBI would not llow her to monitor the raid as is standard protection in such cases, Then they took 32 boxes of documents with them. When chrges was laid the Judge ruled that the documnts shoud be retured to he court for inspection by Trump's lawyers = also stadard procedure ad then the undermining of the co urt started when they returned 21 boxes of documents and i was found that the BI produced nd circukated in the media fake photos about what they found at Mar-el-Lago. End resutl he Court case unravelled and was hrown out by the Judge. Whn Smith applied to the Court he promised tht all doc=uments would be returned - but he wihdrew his appeal.
There was NOT a single standar procedure rule that was followed by t he FBI and that ended up in the case against Trump falling flat.
Which they where legally entitled to do. Imagine a raid on a drug dealers house and moaning about the police going through the drug dealers wife closet.
Concoted BS comaring a drug raid to a raid of the home of an ex-President of he USA. Hell that is real stupidity to come up with BS like that, Are your brain malfnctionig coming up with shit like that.
You have just unquestionable parroted false right wing talking points, all of which can be debunked very quickly by a few minutes fact checking. But of course you want to believe it so why would you fact check it. Yet apparently its the other side that's too far gone.
What fact checking are you taslking about. If there were facts whatsoever it would have let to a sccessful cort case against Trump. That did not ahppen and he caaiign ag ainst Trump collapsed. Tel us plese what facts you checed and where - it would be hilarious,
By the way I am still delighed that Garland and Wray is wel on their way going to jail for various crimes - mainly because they lied nder oath in Senate nd House hearings,
Aide rom that yur sources are going down raidly and CNN and MSNBC is mving into the bankruptsy way and the Washington Post and Los Angeles Times decided that they do not want to keep on destroying their good name by repetitive lying and moved back to be newspapers and not propaganda liars. So your fact-checking souces are going doiwn fast.