This needs its own thread.
A few weeks ago, Bozo made the following Tweets:
Now, I mentioned Bozo's embarrassing blunder in passing (it was on this thread when someone used the word "noble" and it reminded me of this Tweet) and I posted this:
"Reminds me of Bozo's recent tweet when he said the reporters should return their "Noble" (sic) prizes. What a blithering idiot. A seriously stupid and ignorant man who not only doesn't know that it's a "Nobel" prize, but also doesn't realize reporters and journalists win Pulitzer prizes rather than Nobel prizes (or Noble prizes!).
Bozo eventually realized his blunder (or more likely, was told he'd just made another embarrassing blunder) and deleted his Tweet, later asking if "sarcasm ever worked".
LMAO!
To think there are still Trumpanzees out there who worship this painfully stupid and ignorant moron."
Cowardunce responded by saying the following (copied and pasted faithfully):
"You poor bloody simpleton, you are as thick as the news outlets who ran wild with the story. They decided that Trump meant to refer to Nobel prizes. He said Noble because he was meaning Noble. They always proudly quote their endless prizes with their pieces and he was taking the piss at that. How many of the fools have won prizes for their reporting on the Russia hoax and won one award after the other for it...... and then came the Mueller Report. They are trying the same stunt that you always do so expertly......obfuscation.
Noble: From Middle English, from Old French noble, from Latin n?bilis (“knowable, known, well-known, famous, celebrated, high-born, of noble birth, excellent”), from n?scere, gn?scere (“to know”)."
So then I started asking various Trumpanzees whether they agreed with my interpretation of those Tweets or Ceradunce's . . . but none of them replied which is a bit strange because several Trumpanzees have assured me recently that the're not stupid and they're definitely not cowards . . . but none of Cowardunce, Plumchum or Draad the Squeaky Toy could answer my question or even attempted to give an answer . . . although at least one did say he was "too busy" to give an answer.
So now I'm throwing the question open to all the other Trumpanzees in the hope that one of you might not be too busy or too cowardly to answer the question which I have dumbed down to a simple a) or b) answer . . .
Do you believe . . .
a) Rooinek's interpretation of the Tweets or . . .
b) Cowardunce's interpretation of the Tweets?
Just an a) or b) answer. That's all.
Thanks in anticipation!