A summary of the theory of everything.

Blue arse fly which is an expression I introduced on the Messsage Board. It springs to mind because even though you are very thick, you have learned a few things from me.

The biggest waste of space ever in the ste of spce on this site started by a prejudiced idiot ever on this site based on hatred of the best coach in the history of Springbok rugby and some of the best players ever in the case of teama s well, Also a history of a clown who changed the criticism of players on BS, Bot h clowns think and see soemth in g dreamed up from idiocy. Shit-spreading is in their cases is certainly limiless. Actually both exposed themselves endlessly as rugby idiots as a result of hatred, .

I asked Chat, what kind of person would write this:

‘The biggest waste of space ever in the ste of spce on this site started by a prejudiced idiot ever on this site based on hatred of the best coach in the history of Springbok rugby and some of the best players ever in the case of teama s well, Also a history of a clown who changed the criticism of players on BS, Bot h clowns think and see soemth in g dreamed up from idiocy. Shit-spreading is in their cases is certainly limiless. Actually both exposed themselves endlessly as rugby idiots as a result of hatred’

That passage appears to come from someone who is highly emotional, defensive, and deeply invested in a particular rugby debate—most likely an online forum poster venting anger rather than a reasoned writer.

Let’s break down the personality and communication traits:

?? 1. Cognitive & Emotional Traits

1. Highly emotional reasoning: The tone is dominated by anger and resentment, not analysis.
2. Binary thinking: It divides people into heroes (“best coach ever”) and villains (“idiot,” “clown”).
3. Defensiveness: The writer feels a personal stake in defending a coach or player—suggesting strong identity attachment to a team or viewpoint.
4. Projection: Phrases like “hatred,” “idiots,” “shit-spreading” imply that the writer feels attacked and is retaliating in kind.

??? 2. Linguistic / Stylistic Profile

1. Disorganized syntax: Long, tangled sentences with inconsistent punctuation show impulsivity—typing faster than thinking.
2. Overuse of intensifiers: (“ever in the case… ever on this site…”) shows an attempt to amplify outrage.
3. Derogatory language: (“idiot,” “clown,” “shit-spreading”) indicates ad hominem hostility rather than logical debate.
4. Fragmented coherence: Suggests an emotional vent or rant, not an argument drafted with care.

?? 3. Likely Type of Person

1. Older or long-time forum participant, deeply entrenched in community feuds.
2. Possibly narcissistic or obsessive traits — views opposing opinions as personal attacks.
3. Fan identity dominance: Rugby (and perhaps a specific coach or era) forms part of their self-image.
4. Low impulse control when provoked in argument threads.

?? 4. Social Context

That style is very typical of sports forums, especially contentious ones like RuckersForum, where rival posters feud about coaches and selections. The tone suggests someone reacting to criticism of a favourite Springbok coach or players — perhaps defending Rassie Erasmus or Jacques Nienaber from detractors.

? Summary Personality Sketch

A passionate, volatile rugby supporter with strong loyalty, poor emotional regulation, and a tendency to conflate personal identity with team allegiance — resulting in angry, incoherent outbursts when challenged online