A team I would like to see on the field.

This run on team assumes everyone is fit

Kitshoff, Marx, Malherbe 

Eben and Snyman

Kolisi, Roos, Du Toit

Faf, Libok 

Willemse and Am

Kolbe, Arendse and Willie. 

If Willemse's defence is not up to it the very good Allende comes back. Lood comes in if Snyman doesn't come back. 

Roos is clearly better than Wiese. 

Great Pack and great attacking backs. 

Best coach in the game as well in Rassie. 

Baring injuries and bent refs a side capable of wining the RWC again. If that happens be sure Mozzzz and his little echo Alucard will still be complaining about Rassie etc

Roos is not better than Wiese. The jury is still out on him, but as evidenced on this season's body of work, no. Wiese, Eben, Kwagga are our three most important forwards. Faf is not test quality, Willemse is not a 12, Kolisi and Steph are not test quality. You're a funny man Mr Been, almost as funny as Saffex. 

He is twice the player you say. Can this be observed in his carries, tackles, passes or steals etc? Please direct me to the double output. Thanks in advance. 

Absolutely none of those attributes were present for the Boks. The things that exist in your head only exist in your head. Pure fantasy. 

Wiese was thrown in at the deep end and succeeded. He was very good in the Lions series and the RC. In fact, he was out best defender, as well as our only reliable carrier in traffic. He isn't the fan favourite, but he has out produced Roos quite comfortably. Debutant Wiese is much, much better than debutant Roos. All your assertions for what he is at test level have no basis. 

Well, I'm grateful you aren't doing video analysis for Erasmus, or coach. 

No Dud Allende then  HasBeen….I was calling for Willemse at 12 last year, nice to see you catching up. Perhaps in a year or so you will grasp having a lock like Dud Toit swanning on the wing does nothing for us.

Now here we go again - the two idiots are too involved in an one track idiocy complex.  Lets get it straight - they still think about the Meyer technique - the loosies are an extension of the Tight 5 with no part to play in attack.   Loosies when linking up with backline players helps with creating overlaps and create spaces for attack.   If they have ball sense they know where they would be most effective in such cases.    Drawing in multiple defenders they and players like De Allende help with quick ball recovery from breakdown situations also opening gaps for further attacks.

the two idiots are too involved in an one track idiocy complex.

Now here we go again indeed 

 Lets get it straight - they still think about the Meyer technique - the loosies are an extension of the Tight 5 with no part to play in attack. 

I don't see what Meyer has to do with anything right now. The loosies as an extension of the tight 5? Mr Clever, you are getting yourself tied up in knots on a subject you clearly know nothing about. Please end this charade Mr Clever, because I'm starting to feel embarrassed for you. I don't think I can take it anymore. 

PS - Is having a lock at flank making the loose trio more or less dynamic? 

Mozzzzz I said it was a team I would like to see play. 

I picked our most attacking backline as I see it. Hence no Pollard. I want to see just how much we have on attack.  We know what fine players we have in Pollard and Allende. It maybe that they get the whole balance right but let's see.  

Because I am suggesting giving this backline a chance doesn't mean I don't rate Allende or Pollard. We need to see what our options are. So we can pick horses for courses.

One think that worries me a bit about that backline is size. They may cope but let's see how they go. Allende is extremely strong, like an extra loose. Pollard is also a big fly half. 

Doubtless that master mind Rassie is growing the side and weighing things up. 

I was very impressed by Roos. As Dave said he has the brawn but also very importantly the rugby brain. Nice turn of pace. Very promising. Lame ou naturally gets this player all wrong. He stumbles from one absurdity to another. Bwahahaha. 

Now poor Mozzzz thinks he personally has discovered Willemse and Allende supporters think he has to  play every single test. Hahahahaha I have for some time thought Alle nde and Am are over played. Until recently the cupboard wasn't overflowing with riches but that is changing. 

Methinks you protest too much, stick with Moz if you want next year’s good ideas today. 

Poor old Clever is still trying to work out  why the Joker and Nadal dominated Major  tennis again…..even though one player was banned in 2 out of 4 Majors and the other had no serviceable knees. Finally my youngster pick, way before the media, just slaughtered the seuntjie Clever  said was going to win more Majors than Nadal.

He has run into a brick wall there and so he is back trying to get some payback in the rugby section. Unfortunately he is clueless here as well,

Mozart

You have been wrong whenever you open your mouth on anything relating to sport and you always believe in prejudice - nothing else,    You have a mania about players who were great in the past and anything new you reject.   Your hate campaigns against players are ongoing for 9 years now and you pretend you see things that never happened.    You got caught lying too many times to write anything credible on site.        

Mozart

You have been wrong whenever you open your mouth on anything relating to sport and you always believe in prejudice - nothing else,    You have a mania about players who were great in the past and anything new you reject.   Your hate campaigns against players are ongoing for 9 years now and you pretend you see things that never happened.    You got caught lying too many times to write anything credible on site.        

Notice how the most consistently wrong people are the most foul mouthed and the quickest to get personal! That's pretty funny!