Alcatraz put away….

Soooooo Pervert the  man you were trumpeting about was crushed by the player the Joker easily dismissed at the US Open. Thanks for dragging your early mouth bleat onto the Rugby section, so I’m returning the favor. But Zverev ‘was too big and too fast’ for the kid. Man vs boy.

Now Alcaraz is certainly precocious, but there is a long way between that and winning 20 Majors. Please try to be a bit more adult about your crushes.

This is the usual shit from  Mozart.   The fact is the idiot  knows zero about performance evaluation of sportsmen and mentioned  the following in one of his posts under the heading 

 " The kid has some game and all other things being equal looks like a star in the making. Clearly he is highly competitive, bordering on disrespectful at times. He also has a mother who looks like a real piece of work, something many emerging players have benefitted from and eventually discarded. 

He stayed in the ground shot rallies with Novak extremely well and has a huge flat forehand. For a young gun his serving speed was a little disappointing…but his action looks fine.

My main reservations are his name and the cramping. The name is a doozy…spellcheck keeps trying to change it to Bolger…..but I can live with that. Nodskov seems like a name too far and spellcheck agrees. Can anybody with a Nodskov handle be taken seriously?

But the concern has to be the incredible cramping….was it just nerves? It wasn’t that humid in NY. For a young player to be cramping that badly seemed very unusual".

In response  I wrote the most promising youngster in tennis is  Carlos Alcaraz a player who turned 18 in March 2021.    That resulted in the normal Mozart BS attack on Alcaraz when he played Andyy Murray three weeks ago.  The youngster carried an injury in the game nnd lost against Murray.    So wait for it - on Thursday  Alcaraz again had to play Murray and he gave Murray a tennis lesson this time around.   and beat him easily.    

His next game was against  Matteo Berretttini - the number 7 ranked player at present. in the world  - and he did better than any 18 year old in tennis has ever done (that includes  Federer, Nadal and Djokovic)  on ATP 500 level and yesterday he played Sverev in the semifinal of the Vienna Open.    He lost in the semi.

That  being the situation - nobody ever heard of Rune again - he did not get past the qualification rounds in tennis tournaments - while Alcaraz  won the title in an ATP 250 series.   So - back to the normal Mozart BS.    Any younger player identified by anybody as a potential star is always attacked by the Board Idiot - whether it is in any code of sport  identified by anybody.

He has done it in the case of rugby, cricket and now tennis players.   In his tirades against young er players he lost sight of everything rational and now it is the turn of Alcaraz in tennis.   So Alcaraz was beaten by Sverev - who beat Djokovic  easily in the US Open Final in September - and now the above.                .     

Hall Of Fame

44648 posts

We have seen this kind of thread for 8 years now and repeated  constantly - has Mozart nothing else to think about other than to make a fool of himself and the Kindergarten Imbecile?

He was already making himself look like the idiot in the case of Carlos Alcatraz  - the 18 year old tennis player - so he must go on about his other pet hate players. in similar vein.     

So you started it……and his name is Alcaraz you moron. Alcatraz is the name of the jail, which I put in the headline as a joke. Today Alcaraz was easily beaten. Doesn’t mean he is a bad player, just not ready to beat the top players yet. 

Just like Goosen, Willemse, de Kock and a host of other Tokkie discoveries were not bad players….just not ready to make a difference at test  level.

Discovering these kids is no talent, the media shines a bright light on them. It takes no brains. What does take a bit of skill is seeing the potential flaws beyond the hype.

Now eat your crow like the old fool you are.

The no brains in  this case is Mozart at his fullest - the stupid idiot start calling players his own demeaning  way - so Alcaraz became Alcatraz.   The man is a Supreme idiot anyway.     I saw players playing in tournaments and know not what the newspapers write - I do my own job in looking at things.   I do not lie and I do not misrepresent as to hat actually happened,   So here we have an idiot at it again and the IDIOT SU PREME is MOZART.   .    

You called him Alcatraz you ineffable moron….check your post I listed above. I made a joke of that, but hey Alcatraz works.

As for lying, name one lie….you by contrast lied about the number of WC Welsh starters who played yesterday just to name a lie you made in the last hour.

I can write a book about the number of lies and distortions you wrote on this site - and would not like to waste time on that.    Take the famous try scoring opportiunity you invented in the WC final - it was none of the sort and did not happen in the English  22  as you stated.  Fact is it never reached the 22.    That is just one example.   

As to Alcaraz  your newsmedia  hype story has started and will not go away.    That will mean that every match he loses will be gloated about by you on site.   You are a miserable human being - that is all I can say about it.   And  Sverev found it more difficult to beat Alcaraz  than he found to beat Djokovic in the Olympic Games  - while Alcaraz did not cry because he lost like Djokovic did in the US Open after Medvedev demolished him in the final.    .

Anyway - he is a barely 18 year old youngster that will win more grand slams  starting  at a younger age than either of the big three won in their careers.    He has a star coach - Juan-Carlos Ferrero - and he will go places because he is a faster hitter and more difficult to contend with game than either of the big 3 had.       

What gets me about our two resident lifeless geriatrics is not that they bicker and squabble endlessly, both claiming they're winning whatever stupid and childish argument they're currently having . . . it's that they think any of us might be interested in their boring, repetetive and monotonous quarrels . . . so they post their dull drivel here in the rugby section for all to see.

I think these two fossilized old windbags have become so senile and feeble-minded that they are completely unaware of how tiresome they've become or how alike they are. Two ancient, shrivelled and dried out peas in a very old pod.

Hahahahahhahahaha ou rooitwit forgetting the endless spats he has been involved in.

Alcaraz is a brilliant young player. His biggest strength is his blinding speed around the court. He will be working to get more consistency with his serve. He has a terrific all round game and is smart on the court. Like that other great youngster Sinner he ran out of gas against Zverev. 

The Murray /Alcaraz game and the Sinner /Ruud match had some spectacular games. Both Ruud and Sinner hit forehands over 160km Commentators had been saying Ruud had the best forehand in the game and Sinner matched him.

We have seen that a big hitting player on fire can get the better of Novak.  Novak is not playing enough to be in top match form. The ATP 1000 starting on Monday in Paris will see how this strategy going to work for Novak.

Slobolobsky the kiwis have glass jaws and couldn't take the heat although some still post here occasionally. Also they had difficulty confronting truth not told to them by that Globalist Marxist PM of theirs. Nice oaks on the whole with a sense of fun but pretty gullible, naive and ignorant. Bent as boomerangs of course.

The Joker is only interested in Majors at this point. The man is 34 years old, Nadal is 35 and Federer is 40. We have been hearing for 5 years how they are done. But the Joker still won 3 of the 4 majors this year, and the pressure got to him one match away from the Grand Slam. Certainly the greatest accomplishment in sport this year.

Will they continue to win….probably not in the case of Nadal and Federer. Roger should have retired after his Wimbledon win and switched to doubles if he wanted to stay in the scene. Nadal is definitely a waining force.

Novak is still the best player in the game and with good preparation he will likely still win a few more Majors.

All of Tsitsipas, Medvedev and Zverev are potential major winners…but later in their careers than the Big 3. None of them will be as dominant, but Zverev probably has the highest upside.

Then there are the younger set. They all look great…..young players always do playing with no baggage and the built in excuse of their youth in every game. There have been a host of them like Shapalov. Alcatraz is the flavor of the month, but he certainly doesn’t have the best serve or the best backhand.

Only time will tell.

Let me explain something to the number 1 dolt  on site.   He saw Alcaraz playing in one game and that was against Andy Murray three weeks ago.   It was clear that Alcaraz was carrying an injury and that it would have been better if he did not play.  He did and now Mozart gave an assessment about his service as being deicient and his backhand not up to standard after writing the following about the game against Murrary:-

"Hahaha .I just saw Andy Murray …..at 34 with a bad back and hips crushed Clever’s  “future of tennis” Carlos Alcatraz at Indian Wells. I guess Tomorrow Can Wait. "

It took just three weeks for Carlos to turn the tables onn Muaary and he gave Murray a lesson in tennis playing in Vienna.    

Lets also remember in getting through to a semi-final  in a PTA 500 tournament at 18 years of age  was never achieved by Federer, Djokovic and Nadal.    Of the three Federer came nearest - he got through to the quarterfinals - but lost and never got through to a semi. 

As to Djokovic playing in Paris this week - the situation is basically that Djokovic played in no tournaments since the US Open - where he was given a tennis lesson by Medvedev and his absence from playing tennis always caused a disaster when he returned previously.  It happened  when he  played in Monte Carlo after his absence from tennis since the Aussie Open when he was beaten by Evans and a week later in Belgrade where he was beaten by Karatzev.   He did not play in this tournament last year and then turned up for the EOY Championship in London.   He was beaten badly in that tournament by both Medvedev and Thiem and could not get into the final.  

I doubt very much if he will get anywhere far in Paris - but the first few opponents in Paris will be against unseeded players but the question is if  he start meeting better players will he last?      Past records indicate he is unlikely to  succeed.   

There is not much chance of Djokovic winning anything much in future in the line of Majors in future.    This year he did paly in the world cup series before the Aussie Open  and he did badly in that series and manage to win the  Aussie Open.              .     

Mozart

You kmnopw wwhy Djokovic was crying at the US Open is that he realized that his chances of winning more majors are dim      The fact is he is declining in performances like Nadal and Federer and that remains a fact of life - believe it or not player performances declined of aging and the only idiot  not accepting that as a fact of life are you.   .  .    

You are the egg mountain on the forum who have been wring virtually every time you wrote your repetitive BS on site .   

He is declining but he won 3 of the 4 majors and got to the final of the 4th. He had the best year in men’s tennis since Rod Laver, but he is declining. The only way he could be declining but still get those results would be if  his new opposition…the seuntjies you have a crush on….are not a patch on his old opposition, Federer and Nadal.

Thanks for  proving my point… ..wahahahaha…what a clown!

Mozart

Thanks for writing BS on site.    There are two torunaments to be played this year - namely the the Paris Open  - in which  Djokovic did not play in 2021 - and  the EOYT   Championship in which Djokovic failed last year.    In two of the 3 majors - Djokovic played in 5 setters  - in other words he struggled to win  - and he was in a way lucky to win those.    I would not rate that as a comparison to Rod Laver.     In the other tournament  - the Olympic Games - which Djokovic tried to win - he came second best. 

In other words playing only in the Majors and failing in everything else over the past year - he is even questionable as the number 1 player in the world.    If the normal rating system applied in 2020  he would have been nowhere near  the no 1 position  and he would have lost at least 5 000 points which he retained. leaving him at about at  5 or 6 in the ranking despite the three  major wins. 

By the way Carlos Alcaraz  is oplaying Pierre-Hugues Herbert on Tuesday - in case you want to watch him play for the second time.    

 By the way Idiot Speaker - why did you s tart this thread under the rugby component of the Board  since  there is provision for tennis under Other Sports on the Board?       

 I put it on the Rugby Board, because you dragged the tennis debate here first. You still don’t get the point…,none of the big three have cared about anything except Majors for years.

That was never the cased - the only point I made was your ignorance in identifying potential sportsmen  - who can be top performers and I mention Alcaraz as an example where your whole fable stemmed from total  ignorance.    You appear to know nothing about talent identification and less about performance evaluation. .