FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Ancient Ireland schools Young England

Ancient Ireland schools Young England

Started by Mozart17 REPLIES275 VIEWS· 02 Mar 2015, 05:48
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 05:48
#1
02 Mar 2015, 05:48#1

The oldest team in world rugby just keeps rolling. The Poms couldn't be faulted for effort, but Ireland had their measure in every facet of the game. In fact the score could have been larger, but Ireland had several players who played with injuries or like Sexton had to be subbed.


Week after week we see the value of  experienced teams and players across the whole spectrum of sports.


When will the penny drop? We need a core team of experienced players with a few exceptional youngsters.....not a core team of youngsters with a few exceptional experienced players.


And by the way, defence wins big test matches.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Mar 2015, 06:17
#2
02 Mar 2015, 06:17#2
 Mozart
Do you ever do any research before writing trap on this site?   I do not think you do - because you go ballistic especially when it comes to the age affliction you suffer from.
The "oldest team in world rugby"  comprises of players in the following age categories:-
Over 30   -  4 players26-29      -  5 players25 -        -  6 players
How on earth can that be the "oldest team in world rugby"?   Fact is it is probably one of the youngest teams in WR based on average age of the players concerned.   
Please get your facts right before you go ga-ga.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 06:56
#3
02 Mar 2015, 06:56#3
 Their average age for the match against France was 28,9 years. Check your facts dolt.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Mar 2015, 07:36
#4
02 Mar 2015, 07:36#4
 Mozart
You have evidently not done your homework once again - saw the names of a few over-30- players and went bananas.
I have checked the ages of every player in the Irish team specifically and the age distribution I gave is 100% correct.   I took the combined ages and divide it by 15 - to get to an average age of just over 26 years - which for an international team is rather low.    
You have been breaching our agreement on gentlemanly conduct and name-calling repeatedly.  Do you want me to respond in kind in future?
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 11:51
#5
02 Mar 2015, 11:51#5

Moz why not check the stats on the age of the side that played for Ireland on the weekend and come back to us.......egg, egg, egg.

 

For the record they played England yesterday, their age against France has stuff all to do with it

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Mar 2015, 12:12
#6
02 Mar 2015, 12:12#6
 Dave 
100% true.   "Ancient Ireland schools England" - so I checked the ages of the Irish players used in the game and found that as per normal Mozart went bananas.  The Irish team against France had nothing to do with it - the heading and everything else referred to the game yesterday.  The way he justified his comments was hilarious - totally misleading and therefore totally funny.
I have seldom seen a contributor with that much egg in his face and all over him - he really looks funny and foolish at the same time.  

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 12:19
#7
02 Mar 2015, 12:19#7

Yeah had to laugh at that knowing the ages of the new Irish side.

 

Average age of 27 thanks to old timers like O'Connell, Ross, Best and Reddan in the squad.

 

If 27 is ancient, we are in trouble

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
02 Mar 2015, 13:02
#8
02 Mar 2015, 13:02#8
 Dont worry Dr Moz we will have Matfiled at 38 come RWC time that shou ld help! 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Mar 2015, 13:04
#9
02 Mar 2015, 13:04#9
 Beeno
For vitually all of us it would eb a disaster - for Mozart it will be a tonic.  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 15:30
#10
02 Mar 2015, 15:30#10

How many of these wins can I take, and remain the modest chap I am. OOM you forgot the decimal points. You have to include the decimal points if you are doing an average. The average age rounds up to 28, not 26 and the raw number is 27.83. Admittedly a bit lower than the ancient 28.9 that played France because of the injuries to firsrt choice players, but still a very mature team.

 

Kearney 28.9

Bowe 31.0

Payne 29.4

Henshaw 21.7

Zebo 25.0

Xexton 29.6

Murray 26.8

Murphy 23.8

O Brien 28.0

O Mahoney 25.3

O Connell 35.4

Toner 29.6

Ross 25.2

Best 32.5

McGrath 25.3

 

You can have your egg any way Mike and Dave, but given this disaster shall we say sunny side down?

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 15:37
#11
02 Mar 2015, 15:37#11
So 27 is ancient is it......my guess is that is about par with most test sides  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 15:54
#12
02 Mar 2015, 15:54#12

It's not 27 Dave....if you can only deal with integers it's 28. Big difference. And no, it's not unusual for a winning international rugby team.....but it's not 25 or 26 as you would want it. And by the way the last Bok team against Wales, a team which was too old by far for you, averaged 27.16. 

 

Dave best leave the numbers alone hey? Stick to the rant as your weapon of choice.

 

 

Its that time again.....game, setta and match!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SH
ShezzaPro2,471 posts
02 Mar 2015, 16:03
#13
02 Mar 2015, 16:03#13
Ireland have played the most boring brand of rugby this season. Schmidt is quite clearly conservative in his approach to the game.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 16:55
#14
02 Mar 2015, 16:55#14

Nope you will find that 28 never comes into it, the match day 23 average 27.5......hardly ancient as you lied about and my call is that we don't need the washed up has beens in our side like Kirchner, Olivier, Fourie, Jean, Morne, du Preez, Pienaar, Steenkamp, Bakkies, Matfield, Juan Smith and Schalk in our side as we have vastly superior youngsters......a luxuary the poor Irish side does not have.

 

No matter which way you look at it, an average age of 27.5 is anything but ancient, its about par, so your whole thread falls flat on its face for being the bullshit that it is......exposed again   

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:15
#15
02 Mar 2015, 17:15#15

It's over Dave....the numbers are posted for all to see.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:15
#16
02 Mar 2015, 17:15#16

It's over Dave....the numbers are posted for all to see.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:35
#17
02 Mar 2015, 17:35#17
 Mozart
You mentioned the French game and used the players from that game.  Nobody ever used months in calculation of age of players - that is absolute BS.   So forget about your shenanigans and admit you made a hash of the thread.   Beside that you have a load of BS about ancient players.        
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Mar 2015, 17:48
#18
02 Mar 2015, 17:48#18
Nope there is no 8 involved in the equation........so try again  
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news